Guest guest Posted January 22, 2001 Report Share Posted January 22, 2001 Dear Harsha, I think you are being extremely harsh(a) when you say "Such statements have no inherent meaning at all". On the contrary, I remember clearly when, at the advaita classes I used to attend, it was noted that it would be nice if the school itself had an enlightened member to act as leader. This was after the death of Sri Santanand Saraswati, when the school was in some doubt as to its successor. The senior classes were asked (provocatively) the following question: - "If enlightenment were offered to you this very instant, would you take it?" The general concensus from most people might be summed up as something along the lines of "Well yes, but there a few things I would like to do first." It certainly made me think and I would have expected that Tony Parson's statement might have had the same effect on some of the list. Incidentally, have you met Tony Parsons? What knowledge/experience enables you make the judgement that he is a 'parrot of nonduality'? Dennis P.S. I'm not entirely sure whether these notes address your comments, Sunder - I don't profess altogether to understand Burns. (How comes you do, incidentally?) <<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<< *** "We all have a deep longing and a deep fear of the discovery of what we are, and the mind devises any way it can to avoid this discovery. The most effective way it avoids awakening is to seek it." *** __________ Hi Dennis. You may know that sentiments described above have become very common among the "modern" teachers of nonduality. They are supposed to reflect ultimate wisdom and understanding. Such statements have no inherent meaning at all and perhaps they are most useful only for the one making them. Give the parrots of nonduality their due, because there is a place for them also in the scheme of things. People truly learn by teaching. Harsha >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted January 22, 2001 Report Share Posted January 22, 2001 Namaste Dennis, I don't pretend to know Burns! It is just that the poem strikes a chord, but I can't identify the note! And it is an oft- quoted stanza. Just thought you may have been exposed to its explanation. Coincidentally, yesterday I was skimming through an old issue of some magazine a friend had dropped off, and there was one on Wordsworth and Vedanta! Prof. Hastie [circa 1880] was explaining a poem and compared the sentiments to those one got in the presence of Sri Ramakrishna. And guess who was a student in that class? Narendra Datta [later Vivekananda]. It was this comment that sent Narendra to seek out Ramakrishna!! Regards, s. advaitin , "Dennis Waite" <dwaite@d...> wrote: > > P.S. I'm not entirely sure whether these notes address your comments, > Sunder - I don't profess altogether to understand Burns. (How comes you do, > incidentally?) > > > > <<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<< > *** "We all have a deep longing and a deep fear of the discovery of what we > are, and the mind devises any way it can to avoid this discovery. The most > effective way it avoids awakening is to seek it." *** Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.