Guest guest Posted January 24, 2001 Report Share Posted January 24, 2001 On Mon, 22 Jan 2001 21:27:01 -0500, Anand Hudli <anandhudli wrote: > >5) The definition is flawed >--------------------------- >... >is absent in the illusory thing. This gives rise to the defect >of sAdhya-vikalatA, ie. the definition is defective because >we see that mithyAtva is really not defined as GYAnanivartyatva >but as "adhiShThAna-sAxAtkAratva", which makes the advaitin's >attempt to prove the GYAnanivartyatva version futile! The correct expression here should be: adhiShThAna-sAxAtkAra-nivartyatva" instead of "adhiShThAna-sAxAtkAratva". Anand Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.