Jump to content
IndiaDivine.org

Fwd: shrI viShNu sahasranAma bhAShyam.h

Rate this topic


Guest guest

Recommended Posts

--- "Ravisankar S. Mayavaram" <miinalochanii wrote:

> Sat, 6 Jan 2001 15:48:45 -0800

> Reply-to: List for advaita vedanta as taught by Shri Shankara

> <ADVAITA-L

> "Ravisankar S. Mayavaram" <miinalochanii

> Re: shrI viShNu sahasranAma bhAShyam.h

> ADVAITA-L

>

> Some comments of the first verse:

>

> One important aspect of the first ma~NgaLa shloka is that, it

> establishes the identity of brahman and Atman. Lord is described in

> the nirguNa and saguNa form in the first part of the verse, but

> finally

> HE is identified with Atman in the term "buddhi sAxiNe". This verse

> besides saluting Lord kR^iShNa, brings out many valuable concepts of

> vedAnta.

>

>

> AUM buddhi sAxiNe namaH

>

> He is the witness of buddhi. Traditional the antaH karaNam or inner

> organ is made of manas, chitta, buddhi and aha.nkAra. manas is the

> sensing agency. It receives and coordinates different organs like

> eyes

> etc and receives the sensory data. chiita is like a data bank, where

> thing are stored, buddhi is the intellect and aha.nkAra is ego.

> Sometimes these terms are used interchangeably. buddhi is a jaDa

> vastu.

> aha.nkAra arises out avidyA, when it (avidyA) becomes an upAdhi to

> Atman. buddhi and aha.nkAra together creates the notions like "I am

> this" etc. Atman is sAxi for the play that is going on. It does not

> undergo any modifications or suffering. It the reflected

> consciousness

> in the aha.nkAra that struggles in the vortex of life and death

> (saMsAra).

>

> Understanding this concept, leads to a prayer: "O Lord, I eat the

> bitter and sweet fruits from the tree of Life and suffer the

> consequences. I rejoice, weep, struggle, and suffer. You witness all

> this without getting perturbed, with eternal peace and unfathomable

> bliss. I am told (by scriptures and great ones) that I am not what I

> think I am, I am indeed you, but suffering under the limitation of

> avidyA. It is beyond my grasp and I merely repeat what I hear with no

> direct realization. Guide me to the realization or at least to a

> correct theoretical understanding of my true nature, so that I may

> not

> get agitated and do my duties perfectly like thee (akLiShTa kAriNE)

> without getting entangled in the mess of saMsAra"

>

>

>

> AUM sachchidAnandarUpAya namaH

>

> The terms sat, chit, and Ananda, are not taken as the attributes of

> the

> Lord. But they point out that by sat, HE is not asat, infact HE

> transcends these differences. By chit, it is meant that HE is not

> jaDa,

> and in truth, he transcends it. In the same way Ananda, implies that

> He

> is neither sukha or duHkha. Essentially this name celebrates bhagavAn

> as nirguNa brahman.

>

> Even in a sagUNa sense, this shows the completes of Lord. HE is

> existent and has beingness. It is as good as not existing if one is

> not

> aware of his existence, like a jaDa vastu. By chit, we are told is HE

> is conscious. The whole universe is in the scope of consciousness and

> HE is aware of the subtle movement in the atoms. Besides, HIS nature

> is

> unfathomable joy or Ananda. You can never get bored with HIM. The

> more

> one dives deep in HIM more the joy. It is never ending and ever

> increasing. Contrast that with the jIva's consciouness, it is

> pathetically limited. A normal man has no idea (for most part) what

> is

> happening in his body, the blood flows, cells grow and dies, food is

> digested. Everything is hidden from our perception (probably our

> limited consciousness will burn out if we perceive all that). When

> the

> upAdhi-s are on, the difference between jIva and Ishvara are

> enormous.

> Yet, when they are removed, one can assert that AsAvAdityo brahma

> brahmaivAhamasmi.

>

>

> Each one of the name is the first verse have a many beautiful hidden

> treasures of vEdAnta in them. May the Lord enable us to contemplate

> on

> his glories through these names.

>

> Next topic: Verse 2 of ma~NgaLa shloka-s.

>

> Note:

>

> 1) The translation I provide is based on my limited understanding. It

> may have many errors. I will be grateful if you can correct and

> comment.

>

> 2) Credit: Orginal text of the sha.nkara bhAShya is transliterated by

> shrImati Savithriji. I thank her for her kind help.

>

> 3) I am planning to proceed in a very slow pace.

>

>

>

>

=====

> ambaaL daasan

>

> Ravi

>

> sharaNAgata raxakI nivEyani sadA ninnu nammiti mInAxI

>

> http://www.ambaa.org/ http://www.advaita-vedanta.org

>

>

>

> Photos - Share your holiday photos online!

>

 

 

 

 

Auctions - Buy the things you want at great prices.

http://auctions./

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
×
  • Create New...