Nonduality Salon Magazine Mahayanavimsaka of Nagarjuna.htm

[Guest guest]

Nonduality Salon Magazine: Mahayanavimsaka of NagarjunaHiya,

 

Jerry Katz of NDS fame, strangely has kept this "prattling" on his Files.

 

Maybe of some interest to somebody, out here.

 

Have fun.

Seriousness (of any kind, about anything) is a disease.

 

Cheers

 

Sandeep

 

 

 

 

issue number two - October, 2000

Nonduality Salon Magazine

 

(X)

 

MAHAYANAVIMSAKA OF NAGARJUNA:

ADORATION TO THE THREE TREASURES

 

commentary by Sandeep Chatterjee

 

 

--------

 

1. I make my obeisance to the Buddha who is wise, free from all

attachment, and whose powers are beyond conception, and who has kindly taught

the truth which cannot be expressed by words.

 

Commentary: A painting of the sky, even if the painter is Learnado da

Vinci, is never THE sky. It is "about" the sky, a version. And all versions are

bound, limited, "dead". And yet it is only the conceptual, phenomenal context

that communication (with words or otherwise) is possible, ergo, the

communication itself is conceptual, no matter who the communicator is.

 

2 In the transcendental truth there is no origination (utpada), and in

fact, there is no destruction (nirodha).

 

Commentary: Nothing has ever happened, existentially speaking.

 

In a dream, there is orgination, there is destruction, there is movement,

there is change, there is becoming and there is unbecoming. There is chaos and

out of chaos, stars are born, black holes formed.

 

There are World Wars, there are holocausts, there is shame of the

vanquished, there is pride of the victor, there are Mother Theresas and the

pride of charity.

 

All nuances of the dream.

 

Wake up in the morning sipping a cup of tea, the issues of the dream, the

great ethos and pathos, are they of any import? Did

they really occur?

 

The Buddha is like the sky (which has neither origination nor cessation),

and the beings are like him, and therefore they are of the same nature.

 

Commentary: That from which the dream manifested can neither originate or

cease. From a conceptual, phenomenal context any reference to that, any attempt

to depict that, can only be a painting of the sky, hence conceptual.

 

And yet the "wave" as an symbol of the illusory phenomenal world, when you

pick up a wave in your hand, all you get is water. The illusory mirage is

nothing but the sun's rays.

 

This illusory phenomenal world is not different or apart to that

which manifests it. It is an objective expression of what can be called as

pure subjectivity. Potentiality actualizing it's potentiality. They are not two

and are thus of the same nature,

same essence.

 

3. There is no birth either on this or the other side (of the world).

 

Commentary: When nothing has ever happened, what birth, what death.

 

A compound thing (samskrta) originates from its conditions.

 

Commentary: A dance. The dance is a dance, because a dancer is dancing.

The dancer is a dancer becuase a dance has come to be. Where is the separation

between the two?

 

Potentiality actualizing it's innate potentiality, not as something

separate to it, but itself appears to itself, without any change to itself.

 

Therefore it is sunya by its nature.

 

Commentary: The term "sunya" has been much mis-understood to mean "dead

nothingness" Since nothing has ever happened, a conceptual terminology used is

sunyatta, but a sunyatta of total potentiality.

 

This fact comes into the range of knowledge of an omniscient one.

 

Commentary: In a conceptual entity, the apperception of the true identity

may "occur". Not as an act of will, but through pure non-volitionality on part

of the conceptual entity.

 

4. All things by nature are regarded as reflections.

 

Commentary: As appearances in Consciousness.

 

They are pure and naturally quiescent, devoid of any duality, equal, and

remain always and in all circumstances in the same way (tathata).

 

Commentary: Tathata means "Isness". There is an "isness" in all things,

to

all objects within a dream. An object in a dream cannot follow any other alloted

role except it's "isness". Like wise the conceptual entity which has assumed on

itself the mantle of being a subject to all the object he/she observes, is

itself an object which can do nothing but follow it's "isness".

 

A conceptual entity, a biological computer that we are, has no

volition but to follow the program of it's isness.

 

So if shame is arising at this moment, if great profound thoughts of

non-duality are arising at this moment, or you are busy cutting the throat of an

innocent bystander, the conceptual entity is just following it's "isness".

 

The conSequences of the enactment of the "isness", faced by that

conceptual entity is also entirely as per the "isness" of what it is to be.

 

5. In fact, worldings attribute atman to what is not atman,

 

Commentary: Atman or soul, is just the ego's attempts to perpetuate

itself. Seeing the temporal nature of the current identity, the body-mind

complex, it latches on to a more permanent option, Atman , which it expects to

last few lifetimes.,<s>

 

and in the same way they imagine happiness, misery, indifference, passions

and liberation.

 

Commentary: The need to be, by the conceptual entity, thereby establishing

that it is something apart from a mere cognized object, is just the "me-entity"

or "personal doership" in operation. With this "entitification", the pandora Box

of happiness (which immediately gives birth to what misery is supposed to be),

indifference (which immediately gives birth to what passion is supposed to be),

liberation (which immediately gives birth to what bondage is supposed to be),

the Pandora Box is open.

 

And thus the "me-entity" suffers or is happy, for it sees that sometimes

the actions which it believes it is taking, gets it what it hoped to get in the

first place (and hence it is happy) and sometimes it doesn't (and hence it

suffers).

 

The "me-entity" further realises that there is no guarantee as to which of

it's actions will produce what and that the Life it knows is totally uncertain,

death may occur for no reason or rhyme.

 

And thus is born the sense of "insecurity" which in turn drives

it's seeking of solace, consolations or icons of security like Meditation,

the Holy Bible/Gita/Koran, or a Guru, or in today's times, Web based Lists which

discusses/debates such spiritual matters.

 

It seeks to dis-identify with the body because it sees the temporal

fraility and looks for more permanent solutions, like

identifying with the Holy Spirit, Consciousness, God, whatever. Anything

which can assuage the insecurity.

 

And the joke is that when and if the recognition takes place, occurs,

there is no recognizer left, to affirm, confirm or validate.

 

That is why statements like the I am the Holy Spirit, Consciousness, etc

are oxymoron statements.

 

The question then that arises is why does this me-entity come to be in the

first place. First of all, it does not come to be, it appears to be in

operation, like a mirage. It appears to be, so that a "me and 'you" appears to

come to be and Life , which is only a complex of multitude relationships between

a "me" and

"you", Life comes to be. Without the "me and the 'you, the duality of this

me/you, Life cannot be as we know it.

 

For this dialogue which is part of Life, there has to be a "Sandeep" and

another who is not-Sandeep and then the game of dialogue can merrily carry on.

 

Whereas the truth is that it is really Consciousness dialoguing

this particular EMail based conversation with Consciousness.

 

6 - 7. Birth in the six realms of existence in the world, highest

happiness in the heaven, great pain in the hell,--these do not come within the

perview of truth (i.e. cannot be accepted as true); nor do the notions that

unmeritorious actions lead to the extreme misery, old age, disease, and death,

and meritorious actions surely bring about good results.

 

 

Commentary: Good actions, bad actions, doing, not-doing, believing, not

believing, all issues of the dream. Waking up, sip the cup of tea.

 

It is owing to false notions that beings are consumed by fire of passions

even as a forest is burnt by forest conflagration and fall into the hells, etc.

 

 

Commentary:A conceptual entity, a dreamed character, has the false notion

that he or she IS, to feel shame, or that it was my Dad's doing so what the

hell, and hence is subject to Heaven and Hell, both states being part of the

dream.

 

As illusion prevails so do beings make their appearance. The world is

illusory and it exists only on account of its cause and conditions.

 

Commentary: The world (cognized) exists because an illusory cognizer is

around to cognize it. If nobody heard, did the tree fall in the forest goes a

famous Zen kaon.

 

8. As a painter is frightened by the terrible figure of a Yaksa which he

himself has drawn, so is a fool frightened in the world (by his own false

notions).

 

Commentary: The cognized and the cognizer are both illusions, hence can

there be any cognition whether of fear or joy?

 

9. Even as a fool going himself to a quagmire is drowned therein, so are

beings drowned in the quagmire of false notions and are unable to come out

thereof.

 

Commentary: So long there is a seeking for liberation, a doing towards

seeking, the seeker fundamentally pre-supposes that he or she is bound. The

seeking and the pre-supposition are two sides of the same coin. Can't have one

without the other. Like a shadow. And thus all seeking is trying to stamp out

your own shadow.

 

10. The feeling of misery is experienced by imagining a thing where in

fact it has no existence. Beings are tortured by the poison of false notions

regarding the object and its knowledge.

 

 

Commentary: Objects in a dream, with it great ethos and pathos. waking up

in the morning sip your cup of tea.

 

11. Seeing these helpless beings with a compassionate heart one should

perform the practices of the highest knowledge (bodhicarya) for the benefit of

them.

 

Commentary: That is why speech takes place by the ones who know, knowing

that any speech is a corruption, falsity.

 

12. Having acquired requisites thereby and getting unsurpassable bodhi one

should become a Buddha, the friend of the world, being freed fron the bondage of

false notions.

 

Commentary: Phenomena is just the objective expression of that which IS.

Knowing it is a illusion, fully participate in it, if that is what comes up,

fully withdraw, when that comes up and vice-versa. No rejection, no acceptance.

 

13. He who realizes the transcendental truth knowing the pratityasamutpada

(or the manifestation of entities depending on their causes and conditions),

knows the world to be sunya and devoid of beginning, middle or end.

 

Commentary: Nothing ever happened.

 

14. The samsara and nirvana are mere appearances; the truth is stainless,

changeless, and quiescent from the beginning and illumined.

 

Commentary: Nothing ever happened, yet that which-is, IS.

 

15. The object of knowledge in dream is not seen when one awakes.

 

Commentary: Because the one who wakes up, does not consider

himself/herself to be merely another object. Thus the sleep-dream is understood,

but not this waking dream.

 

Similarly the world disappears to him who is awakened from the darkness of

ignorance.

 

Commentary: In deep sleep, all your profanities and all your

profoundities, all your relationships and all your ethos and pathos, all are no

more, as temporarily you the "me-entity" are no more.

 

The creation of illusion is nothing but illusion. When everything is

compoond there is nothing which can be regarded as a real thing. Such is the

nature of all things

 

 

Commentary: Nothing has ever happened. Happenings are ony with the

conceptual context of space and time, which themseves are conceptual constructs.

 

16. One having origination (jati) does not originate himself. Origination

is a false conception of the people. Such conceptions and (conceived) beings,

these two are not reasonable.

 

Commentary: When nothing has happened, there is no origination, there is

no cessation.

 

17. All this is nothing but mind (citta) and exists just like an illusion.

Hence originate good and evil actions and from them good and evil birth.

 

Commentary: Good, Bad, Evil, all dynamics of the dream, within a dream

 

18. When the wheel of the mind is suppressed, all things are suppressed.

Therefore all things are devoid of atman (independent nature), and consequently

they are pure.

 

Commentary: No conceptual entity has volition.

 

19. It is due to thinking the things which have no independent nature as

eternal, atman, and pleasant that this ocean of existence (bhava) appears to one

who is enveloped by the darkness of attachment and ignorance.

 

Commentary: To a "me-entity", with a sense of personal doership, hence

having the issue to become something , enlightened or a buffoon, for this

"me-entity" it subject to the rise and crash of the "wave".

 

20. Who can reach the other side of thc great ocean of samsara which is

full of water of false notions without getting into the great vehicle (i.e.,

Mahayana) ?

 

Commentary: Without apperception of the truth, all doing is round and

round the mulberry bush.

 

How can these false notions arise in a man who thoroughly knows this world

which has originated from ignorance?

 

Commentary: Once the apperception "occurs", where is the "me-entity" left

to have any notions, right or wrong?

 

Sandeep's web page is at www.nonduality.com/sandeep.htm

 

(X)

 

 

Nonduality Salon Magazine, Issue Number Two, contents