Guest guest Posted March 24, 2001 Report Share Posted March 24, 2001 >From : The Elegant Universe, by Brian Greene in Frontier Perspectives from the Center for Frontier Sciences ------------------ The graviton, the smallest bundle of gravitational force, is one particular pattern of string vibration. And just as an electromagnetic field such as visible light is composed of an enormous number of photons, a gravitational field is composed of an enormous number of gravitons - that is, an enormous number of strings executing the graviton vibrational pattern. Gravitational fields, in turn, are encoded in the warping of the spacetime fabric, and hence we are led to identify the fabric of spacetime itself with a colossal number of strings all undergoing the same, orderly, graviton pattern of vibration. In the language of the field, such an enormous, organized array of similarly vibrating strings is known as 'coherent state' of strings. It's a rather poetic image - the strings of string theory as the threads of the spacetime fabric - but we should note that it's rigorous meaning has yet to be worked out completely. Nevertheless, describing the spacetime fabric in this sting-stitched form does lead us to contemplate the following question. An ordinary piece of fabric is the end product of someone having carefully woven together individual threads, the raw material of common textiles. Similarly, we can ask ourselves whether there is a raw precursor to the fabric of spacetime. -------------- S: Indeed. As I keep asking, at the Big Bang, what exploded, or who banged whom?<g> ------------- Notice that it is somewhat inaccurate to picture this state as a jumbled mass of individual vibrating strings that have yet to stitch themselves together into an ordered whole because, in our usual way of thinking, this presupposes a notion of both space and time - the space in which a string vibrates and the progression of time that allows us to follow its changes in shape from one moment to the next. ------------------ S: Indeed. Space, time are conceptual constructs needed to cognise manifestation and hence simultaneoulsy appear to be, along with phenomenality.There is no aprior space-time construct in which something came to be manifested. The dance is a dance, because a dancer is dancing.The dancer is a dancer, because a dance is unfolding. Since, time as a concept appears to come to be so that "duration" comes to be and hence phenomenality can be cognised through "change", what is before "time", is still a question framed within the concept of "time". Hence the question itself is meaningless and if the illusion of "time" is apperceived, what can be said, whether anything is happening, has happened, OR that nothing has happened. -------------------- But in the raw state, before the strings that make up the cosmic fabric engage in the orderly, coherent vibrational dance we are discussing, there is *no realization of space or time*. Even our language is too coarse to handle these ideas, for, in fact, there is even no notion of *before*. -------------------- S: Exactly what I am saying. The whole connotation of "before" is meaningless. Thus "after" is as much meaningless. ------------------ In a sense, it's as if individual strings are "shards" of space and time, and only when they appropriately undergo sympathetic vibrations do the conventional notions of space and time emerge. ------------------ S: To persistent questioning by amateur seekers, the Master coins a term Consciousness-at-rest, Consciousness-in-repose, Awareness-not- aware- of itself, Noumenon, "That" . And further states that phenomenality, Consciousness-in-movement, is the dream of "That", arising, when the notion of "I AM (the Big Bang) arises in "That". Sweet lollies, to assuage the seeker, the Master knowing, that all prattlings, by anybody (including himself/herself), at anytime, to anybody, ever, can only be a concept. Within the conceptual framework of phenomenality, in which the Master-disciple dialogue (relationship) is unfolding, what else can get created, but concepts. Some concepts dig deep, like a thorn, some only superficially scratch the surface.. Daaaa Daaaa Deee Duuuum Cheers Sandeep Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted March 24, 2001 Report Share Posted March 24, 2001 advaitin, "Sandeep Chatterjee" <sandeepc@b...> wrote: > From : > S: > > To persistent questioning by amateur seekers, the Master coins a term Consciousness-at-rest, Consciousness-in-repose, Awareness-not- aware- of itself, Noumenon, "That" . > > And further states that phenomenality, Consciousness-in-movement, is the dream of "That", arising, when the notion of "I AM (the Big Bang) arises in "That". > > Sweet lollies, to assuage the seeker, the Master knowing, that all prattlings, by anybody (including himself/herself), at anytime, to anybody, ever, can only be a concept. Or Beauty Itself Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.