Jump to content
IndiaDivine.org

Frankji/Buddha Nature

Rate this topic


Guest guest

Recommended Posts

Guest guest

I tried posting this before but It didn't work .. (apologies if two

arrive)

 

advaitin, f maiello <egodust@d...> wrote:

> colette wrote:

> >

> > I just this week have asked elsewhere what this concept of anatman

is?

> >

> > I am no expert at all on Buddhism but I like to think that we are

all

> > exploring the same Reality just using different words. I like to

see

> > where paths meet.

> >

>

> whoa! this is the whole point: all paths meet at one summit!

 

Existence Itself. Some call It Self but or It or That ...

 

what i'm claiming has been the most popular mistake

> in interpretation of sakyamuni buddha's assertion of 'anatta'--

> first of all, in responding to whether the soul or god existed or

> not, he remained silent. *that* was interpreted as a 'no'!!

 

 

Yes. Some could say It's Silence Itself. Silence on the move & non

moving.

 

it is in fact *existential*, which inherently precludes

> some being having a state of consciousness.

 

Life

>

> buddha's purpose for silence in the face of in fact what amounts

> to have been *all* philosophical speculation, is to stop that

> part of the human mind's historic obsessive-compulsion to resolve

> and make reasonable the Unknowable.

>

> the following url provides an excellent intro to buddhism:

> http://www.theosociety.org/pasadena/dhamma/dham-hp.htm

 

Thanks Frank. You may find it interesting that I just bought a copy of

the Dhammapada recently. Yesterday I found a marvellous Buddhist

writer in March's Shambhala Sun Magazine. His name is Tulku Urgyen

Rinpoche. I really like him!

 

"Mind is not a thing that has physical form, sound, smell, taste or

texture. Mind is empty. Space is also empty. No matter where you go in

space, there is no limit, no boundary, no edge. If you were to travel

in a space ship in a single direction for a hundred billion years, you

would not reach the end of space. It's the same with the other

directions - you can travel forever, & you'll never reach a place

where pace ends.

 

Now, how can something without limits have a center? It can't, can it?

That is why it is taught that space has no center & no edge. The

Buddha used space to point to how mind is. He said that mind is empty

like space: That just as space has no limits in any direction, mind

has no center or edge. As a matter of fact, wherever there is space,

wherever space reaches, there are sentient beings. And wherever there

are sentient beings there are disturbing emotions & the creation of

karma. And wherever there is the creation of disturbing emotion and

karma, there is also buddha nature. The awakened mind of the buddhas

is all pervasive.

 

As sentient beings, we think, we remember, we plan - & the attention

thus exerted moves towards an object & sticks to it. This mental

movement is called thinking or conceptual mind. We have many different

expressions in Tibetan to describe the functioning of this basic

attitude of mind, of this extroverted consciousness unaware of its own

nature. This ignorant mind grabs hold of objects, forms concepts about

them, & gets involved & caught up in the concepts it has created ..

 

All these involvements are merely fabricated creations; they are not

the natural state. They are based on the concepts of subject & object,

perceiver & perceived. This dualistic structure, together with the

disturbing emotions & the karma that is produced through them, are the

forces that drive us from one samsara to another. Yet, all the while,

there is still the basic nature, which is not made out of anything

whatsoever. It is totally unconstructed & empty, & at the same time it

is aware: it has the quality of being able to cognize. This

indivisible unity of being empty & cognizant is our original ground

that is never lost."

 

Tulku Urgyen Rinpoche

 

Peace,

 

Col

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest guest

>

> colette [colette]

> Thursday, April 05, 2001 3:26 AM

> advaitin

>

> Now, how can something without limits have a center? It can't, can it?

 

YES! It can! The center is at the very same place, where you are *thinking*

of starting your journey from! :-)

 

I remain Yours,

Madhava

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest guest

>"Madhava K. Turumella" <madhava

>

> >

> > colette [colette]

> > Now, how can something without limits have a center? It can't, can it?

>

>YES! It can! The center is at the very same place, where you are

>*thinking*

>of starting your journey from! :-)

>

>I remain Yours,

>Madhava

 

yes or no - yes only if one thinks that he is limited with a center and he

has to do the journey towards the truth

 

no if you have realized that you are that infinite and there is no need for

any journey.

 

Infinity and center and infinity with a center all notions drop out in the

infinity. Even the concept of infinity also drops out - These words are used

only to negate the notions of opposite. Infinity only means it is not any

finite - objects, concepts, notions etc etc. existent only means it is not

non existent. It is undifferentiable, incomprehensible, unmanifest etc,

opposites of what we know or can know by intellect.

 

Hari Om!

Sadananda

 

 

 

 

_______________

Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest guest

BEAUTIFUL! Thank you. :-)

>

> Kuntimaddi Sadananda [k_sadananda]

> >"Madhava K. Turumella" <madhava

> >

> > >

> > > colette [colette]

> > > Now, how can something without limits have a center? It

> can't, can it?

> >

> >YES! It can! The center is at the very same place, where you are

> >*thinking*

> >of starting your journey from! :-)

> >

> >I remain Yours,

> >Madhava

>

> yes or no - yes only if one thinks that he is limited with a

> center and he

> has to do the journey towards the truth

>

> no if you have realized that you are that infinite and there

> is no need for

> any journey.

>

> Infinity and center and infinity with a center all notions

> drop out in the

> infinity. Even the concept of infinity also drops out - These

> words are used

> only to negate the notions of opposite. Infinity only means

> it is not any

> finite - objects, concepts, notions etc etc. existent only

> means it is not

> non existent. It is undifferentiable, incomprehensible,

> unmanifest etc,

> opposites of what we know or can know by intellect.

>

> Hari Om!

> Sadananda

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest guest

Col wrote (from Tulku Urgyen Rinpoche):-

 

If you were to travel in a space ship in a single direction for a hundred

billion years, you would not reach the end of space. It's the same with the

other directions - you can travel forever, & you'll never reach a place

where pace ends.

 

Sorry to be pedantically scientific but isn't it the case that, if you

travel in a straight line in any direction, you eventually arrive back where

you started? Not that I see this as a problem at all. I haven't quoted any

T. S. Eliot for a while but, as he says,

 

We shall not cease from exploration

And the end of all our exploring

Will be to arrive where we started

And know the place for the first time.

 

Still says it all for me.

 

Dennis

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
×
  • Create New...