Jump to content
IndiaDivine.org

Fwd: RE: Upanishadic traditons

Rate this topic


Guest guest

Recommended Posts

Guest guest

I am forwarding the response I received from Shree Krishna Kashyap on

the questions raised by Shree Sunder. Although Krishna has included

advaitin list address, I am not sure it gets posted since he is not

the member of the list. If you see this post twice my apologies.

 

Krishna- there was also a question raised in this list whether

Bhagavaan Ramanuja has written any bhaashya-s on the upanishads. The

current understanding in the list is that he wrote only on Vedanta

suutra and Bhagavad Geeta. I know Shree Vedanta Deshika has written

commentary on Ishaavaasya. Any clarification for the benefit of the

members of the list.

 

Hari Om!

Sadananada

 

>"Krishna Kalale" <kkalale1

>"K. Sadananda" <sada, <advaitin>

>RE: Re: Upanishadic traditons

>Tue, 10 Jul 2001 07:46:45 -0700

>X-Priority: 3 (Normal)

>Importance: Normal

>

>Namaste,

>

>

>

>To my understanding there are no mahavakyas in the visistadvaita or

>dvaita sampradaya. Mahavakyas are accepted in the Advaita

>tradition. There are several books which deal with the mahavakyas

>but may not be in an orderly manner. Dr. NS Anantharangachar of

>bangalore taught me "tat tvam asi" from different schools of thought

>for 30 days 3 hours each! About 10 years back. Rangaramanuja

>bhasyas on upanisads deal with these vakyas from visistadvaitic

>perspective. I am sure several works from advaita deal with these

>in detail. There is ample literature on this from major schools

>since these are the main points of controversy. But to my knowledge

>there is no single text book which does this comparison.

>

>

>

>there is an English /Kannada book) written by Prof. Naranachar. I

>have 20 or 30 of copies of this book - this book is a little too

>critical for ordinary consumption. The name is "tattvamasi and

>netineti" as per three schools of thought). I will be glad to mail

>you these books for $10 (includes postage in USA).

>

>

>

>However,

>

>

>

>Three books :

>

>

>

>The philosophy of Vedanta sutras - according to Samkara Ramuja &

>Madhva - SMS Chari ( in print)

>

>The philosophy of Upanisads - according to Samkara Ramuja &

>Madhva - SMS Chari (will be published shortly)

>

>The philosophy of Bhagavadgita - according to Samkara Ramuja &

>Madhva - SMS Chari ( currently being written)

>

>

>

>Give a reader ample scope to contemplate on the differences between

>the three main schools of thought. It is written in a fairly

>impartial manner.

>

>

>

>I was told that there were several Sanskrit and vernacular books on

>this subject that are not available (easily)

>

>. As per pundits, the other schools of Vedanta have borrowed many a

>thought from these three main schools.

>

>

>

>

>Asmadgurubhyo namah

>

>

>

>Krishna Kashyap

>

>

>

>

>

>

>K. Sadananda [sada]

>Tuesday, July 10, 2001 7:04 AM

>advaitin

>Cc: kkalale1

> Re: Upanishadic traditons

>

>

>

>Sunder, as I understand only Adviata gives more importance to

>j~naanam as the moksha saadhakam and hence the emphasis on

>mahavaakya-s. In the other two, Bhakti involving sharaNaagati with

>upaasana is emphasized while j~naanam that involves understanding of

>the organic relation between jiiva and parabrahman is intermediary

>step that instigates true bhakti as moksha saadhana. I am

>forwarding your question to Shree Krishna Kashyap who can provide a

>better answer from vishishhTaadvaita point.

>

>

>

>Hari Om!

>

>Sadananda

>

>

>

>

>

>Namaste,

>

> That leads me to the next question: Are there other

>'mahaavaakya'-s that the non-advaita schools adopt?

>

>Regards,

>

>s.

>

>

>advaitin, "K. Sadananda" <sada@a...> wrote:

>> >Namaste,

>> >

>> > Is there a work available [preferably on the web!] where the

>> >different schools are compared and contrasted ONLY on the 4

>> >'mahaa-vaakya'-s ?

>> >

>> >Thanks.

>> >

>> >

>> >Regards,

>> >

>> >s.

>> >

>>

>> To answer your question, I do not think so, at lest I am not aware

>of

>> it. They are considered as Mahavaakya-s mostly by Adviatins and not

>> by others. In fact for tat tvam asi - they add 'a' to make it

>> negative - atat tvam asi swetaketo! as you are not that! -

>>

>

> > I will ask Shreeman S.M.Sreenivasa Chari when he visits here. He

>

> > will be giving talks on Comparison of the three matams. We are

>> having his lectures from July 21st to 27th.

>>

>> Hari Om!

>

> > Sadananda

>

>--

>K. Sadananda

>Code 6323

>Naval Research Laboratory

>Washington D.C. 20375

>Voice (202)767-2117

>Fax:(202)767-2623

 

--

K. Sadananda

Code 6323

Naval Research Laboratory

Washington D.C. 20375

Voice (202)767-2117

Fax:(202)767-2623

 

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
×
  • Create New...