Guest guest Posted July 25, 2001 Report Share Posted July 25, 2001 namaste. A human goes through the three states of wake-up, dream- and deep-sleep. The impressions from the wake-up state are carried on to the dream state and from the dream-state to the wake-up state. In deep-sleep, none of the impressions are carried. The dream-state world evolves out of the remanence of the impressions during the wake-up state. If our mind is occupied by something during the wake-up state, it is likely, the same thought manifests itself as a dream-world story. The subtle body of the dream state does not carry the puNya or pApa of the wake-up world's subtle body. If we kill someone in our dream, the pApA associated with it will not carry forward to the wake-up state. Similarly, if we have dreamt we are blessed by our paramaguru, the subtle body will not carry that puNya on to the wake-up state. Although this is contrary to the popular belief that a good dream is a good omen and a bad dream is a bad omen, it has to be recognized both (good and bad) are dreams and their carry-over effect in terms of karma from one state to the other is nil. Another way to say this is: a sumptuous dinner of the wake-up world will not satisfy the hunger of the dream world or having a bellyful of water in the dream world will not quench the thirst of the wake-up world. But, at the same time, both (dream-state and wake-up state) are not independent. Both affect the same embodied jIvA. Yet, the karma of one state is not carried into the other and also, the effects of these two states are not carried into the deep-sleep state. So, in effect then, karma does not cross the boundary from one state to the other. All this leads to the famous statements by King Janaka in the AShTAvakrasamhitA, I believe. The above analysis also leads to the following questions: 1. Then where is karma? How is it carried forward? Does that karma that we talk of then really belong to the wake-up state jIvA? 2. We were brought up that a good dream is a good omen and a bad dream is bad. Is it really? If not for the fact that a 'bad' dream may probably be the after-effect of the pent-up anxiety of the wake-up state (the same can be said of the good dream too), what is wrong with a 'bad' dream? Regards Gummuluru Murthy - Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted July 25, 2001 Report Share Posted July 25, 2001 How are the prophetic dreams accounted for when they directly cause one to act in the wake-up state? Gummuluru Murthy wrote: > But, at the same time, both (dream-state and wake-up state) are > not independent. Both affect the same embodied jIvA. Yet, the > karma of one state is not carried into the other and also, the > effects of these two states are not carried into the deep-sleep > state. So, in effect then, karma does not cross the boundary > from one state to the other. > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted July 30, 2001 Report Share Posted July 30, 2001 On Wed, 25 Jul 2001, Gasusima wrote: > How are the prophetic dreams accounted for when they directly cause one to act in the wake-up > state? > > Gummuluru Murthy wrote: > > > But, at the same time, both (dream-state and wake-up state) are > > not independent. Both affect the same embodied jIvA. Yet, the > > karma of one state is not carried into the other and also, the > > effects of these two states are not carried into the deep-sleep > > state. So, in effect then, karma does not cross the boundary > > from one state to the other. > > namaste shri Gasusima-ji, I meant to respond to your post earlier but somehow, inadvertantly, that was put aside. My apologies for the late picking up of the thread. You say how about prophetic dreams. Even there, as I understand, karma-phala (the vAsanA-s acquired) will not and cannot transcend the state. There may be immediate and fleeting transcending, for example, the perspiration felt in the wake-up state soon after seeing a dream-tiger in the dream state. I am talking of more-lasting karma-phala (like the sin associated with a murder committed in the dream or a puNya associated with visiting KAshi in a dream). That is, the vAsanA-s acquired in the dream-state are for the subtle-body of the dream-state only and the vAsanA-s acquired in the wake-up state are for the subtle body of the wake-up state only. I am not saying the subtle body is different in the two states, but I am saying the karma-phala of one state stays in that state only. Others may not agree with this assessment, but I would like to see a solid basis or reference for thinking contrary. If that (the inability of karma-phala to transcend or conduit through a different state) were so, I am saying: The general concept in vyavahArika is: the subtle body, when it discards the physical body (at the time of physical death), carries forward its karma-phala, and according to its karma-phala, acquires a new physical body. My question is: what karma-phala are we talking about? Is it the karma-phala of the wake-up state? If so why that importance to the wake-up state? If karma-phala does not transcend a state (from wake-to dream or deep-sleep), how would it transcend the discarding of a physical body? I am not saying I doubt the validity of the karma theory in vyavahArika, but seeking clarification on some doubts how it functions. Regards Gummuluru Murthy ---- Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted July 30, 2001 Report Share Posted July 30, 2001 Namaste Sri Murthyji, You raise an interesting question about acquiring and working out karmas in different states of consciousness. Here is another perspective for your consideration, although it does not address all the points you make. I will pass this on to as well. Sages tell us that karmas of different states of consciousness can indeed overlap. Therefore it may be possible to acquire the karma in one state and work it out in another state of consciousness. Sri Ramana helping his mother attain Moksha by making her go through future experiences (which were stored in her subtle body) at her passing away is an example of exhausting karmas acquired in one state in a different and more subtle state. Yogic psychology indicates that karmas acquired in gross states can be worked out or affected in more subtle states. This is why the Shastras emphasize making the mind or the intellect subtle. Divine visions and prophetic dreams spring up from subtler levels of consciousness. The Self on which all subtle and gross states depend, when realized makes all karmas moot. Sri Ramana used to say that if a husband has 3 wives and the husband dies, all the wives become widows simultaneously. Similarly, upon Self-Realization, all three types of karmas acquired in gross or subtle states become undermined simultaneously. The general practical rule of thumb that can be suggested in vyavahArika (in the field of relativity) based on experience and testimony of yogis is that karma acquired in grosser states can be worked out to some extent or a large extent in subtle states. Namaste and love to all Harsha Gummuluru Murthy [gmurthy] Monday, July 30, 2001 9:23 AM advaitin Re: wake-up and dream- states On Wed, 25 Jul 2001, Gasusima wrote: > How are the prophetic dreams accounted for when they directly cause one to act in the wake-up > state? > > Gummuluru Murthy wrote: > > > But, at the same time, both (dream-state and wake-up state) are > > not independent. Both affect the same embodied jIvA. Yet, the > > karma of one state is not carried into the other and also, the > > effects of these two states are not carried into the deep-sleep > > state. So, in effect then, karma does not cross the boundary > > from one state to the other. > > namaste shri Gasusima-ji, I meant to respond to your post earlier but somehow, inadvertantly, that was put aside. My apologies for the late picking up of the thread. You say how about prophetic dreams. Even there, as I understand, karma-phala (the vAsanA-s acquired) will not and cannot transcend the state. There may be immediate and fleeting transcending, for example, the perspiration felt in the wake-up state soon after seeing a dream-tiger in the dream state. I am talking of more-lasting karma-phala (like the sin associated with a murder committed in the dream or a puNya associated with visiting KAshi in a dream). That is, the vAsanA-s acquired in the dream-state are for the subtle-body of the dream-state only and the vAsanA-s acquired in the wake-up state are for the subtle body of the wake-up state only. I am not saying the subtle body is different in the two states, but I am saying the karma-phala of one state stays in that state only. Others may not agree with this assessment, but I would like to see a solid basis or reference for thinking contrary. If that (the inability of karma-phala to transcend or conduit through a different state) were so, I am saying: The general concept in vyavahArika is: the subtle body, when it discards the physical body (at the time of physical death), carries forward its karma-phala, and according to its karma-phala, acquires a new physical body. My question is: what karma-phala are we talking about? Is it the karma-phala of the wake-up state? If so why that importance to the wake-up state? If karma-phala does not transcend a state (from wake-to dream or deep-sleep), how would it transcend the discarding of a physical body? I am not saying I doubt the validity of the karma theory in vyavahArika, but seeking clarification on some doubts how it functions. Regards Gummuluru Murthy ---- Discussion of Shankara's Advaita Vedanta Philosophy of nonseparablity of Atman and Brahman. Advaitin List Archives available at: http://www.eScribe.com/culture/advaitin/ To Post a message send an email to : advaitin Messages Archived at: advaitin/messages Your use of is subject to Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted July 30, 2001 Report Share Posted July 30, 2001 Greetings Gummuluru Murthy, >I am talking of more-lasting karma-phala (like the >sin associated with a murder committed in the dream >or a puNya associated with visiting KAshi in a dream) >I am not saying the subtle body is different in the >two states, but I am saying the karma-phala of one >state stays in that state only. Others may not agree >with this assessment, but I would like to see a solid >basis or reference for thinking contrary. As I had indicated in my earlier posting, we need a more solid understanding of what is Paapa and What is Punya ? What Karma produces what result ? Do we accrue Karma in the dream state at all ? Or is Dream state the state where the Karma is only consumed with no accrual ? If so this Karma that is consumed in the dream state must come from the waking state. Comments / Criticisms welcome. Regards Shrinivas Make international calls for as low as $.04/minute with Messenger http://phonecard./ Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.