Guest guest Posted July 29, 2001 Report Share Posted July 29, 2001 Greetings, How would one define Yoga from a Vedantic point of View ? How would one expalin Yoga Siddhis (Yogic Powers) ? Could I request the memebers of this forum to offer their views on these topics. Regards Shrinivas Make international calls for as low as $.04/minute with Messenger http://phonecard./ Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted July 30, 2001 Report Share Posted July 30, 2001 I believe that the most succinct answer to this question may be found by examining the Yoga Sutras of Patanjali. Trust in your own experience as much as any of the commentators (although Shankara was very astute). If you don't have any - follow the guidance therein - the Sutras are like a bija, a seed of all knowledge. The Siddhis are just a feature of growing awareness, and may be experienced initially spontaneously, and later at will. I have a speculation that Patanjali was not a real person, but that the name is itself an allegory of how the knowledge was imparted ... Jai Guru Dev (Brahmananda Saraswati of Jyotir Math is my paramguru, as he is of at least hundreds of thousands of TM initiates. Irrespective of the many frailties of the TM movement - it's basic premise of attaining the transcendent state is an exact methodology as espoused by Patanjali.) Try this as a start: 1. Now, instruction on Yoga. 2. Yoga comes from transcending the processes of individual consciousness, 3. then is one absorbed in the essence of the inner witness. 4. Otherwise, (we identify) with the form of those processes. 5. Those processes are five in number, and can be painful or painless: 6. True understanding, miscomprehension, conceptualisation, sleep and memory. 7. True understanding comes from sensory perception, inference or reliable testimony. 8. Miscomprehension is a false notion of something's proper form. 9. Conceptualisation flows from verbal notions and has no substance. 10. The process of sleep is founded in the concept of nothingness. 11. Memory is the retention of experienced sensations. 12. Those (processes) are transcended with practice, and practice of detachment. 13. Steady effort in that (citta-vritti-nirodhah) is practice, 14. which becomes firmly rooted by being correctly done, uninterrupted, over a long time. 15. Detachment is mastery over instincts, the need to satiate experience or description of sensations. 16. Freedom from desire of the transient world comes from knowledge of the higher Self. | | Shrinivas Gadkari [sgadkari2001] | Monday, 30 July 2001 03:13 | advaitin | On Yoga | | | Greetings, | | How would one define Yoga from a Vedantic | point of View ? | | How would one expalin Yoga Siddhis (Yogic Powers) ? | | Could I request the memebers of this forum to | offer their views on these topics. | | Regards | Shrinivas | | | | Make international calls for as low as $.04/minute with | Messenger | http://phonecard./ | | ------------------------ Sponsor | ---------------------~--> | Small business owners... | Tell us what you think! | http://us.click./vO1FAB/txzCAA/ySSFAA/XUWolB/TM | ---------------------------- | --------~-> | | Discussion of Shankara's Advaita Vedanta Philosophy of | nonseparablity of Atman and Brahman. | Advaitin List Archives available at: http://www.eScribe.com/culture/advaitin/ To Post a message send an email to : advaitin Messages Archived at: advaitin/messages Your use of is subject to Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted July 30, 2001 Report Share Posted July 30, 2001 Namaste, Sri Brian has given an comprehensive explanation of Yoga in the context of the Yoga Sutras of Patanjali. The usage of the term, Yoga in the Upanishads and in the Bhagavad Gita are quite different from the terminology adopted by Patanjali in Yoga Sutra. Yoga in the Vedantic terminology is explained below: The goal of Vedanta is to help the jiva (human life) to attain mukti. Jiva's bondage starts with the vrtti (waves of thoughts in the mind), for example the sight of an object such as a banana. An object such as banana is Ishwara Sristi (God's creation) and it contains certain intrinsic qualities (recognizable shape, color and taste). When Jiva recognizes the banana, it denotes the state of nirvikalpaka vrtti. Jiva creates his/her own perception of the banana (Jiva Sristi) by looking, touching, smelling and tasting; and this is the state of savikalpaka vritti. Jiva recognizes the banana with distinct attributes such as good banana, bad banana, rotten banana, big banana, small banana etc. At the sankalpa, Jiva develops certain permanent impressions on his/her like and dislike of banana. Yoga becomes necessary Sadhana to get rid of the sankalpa to reprogram the mind to deny the influence of vrtti. Sadhanas are the essential components of Yoga and the practice of Yoga helps reach the state of Samadhi and ultimately mukti. Glossary Source: A Dictionary of Advaita Vedanta, by Swami Harshananda, Ramakrishna Math, Bangalore, India. (This is an excellent reference book for everyone interested in Advaita). This is available through Ramakrishna Mission Publications. To explain Advaita Vedanta, these words are useful but they are neither necessary nor sufficient! These terms are specifically chosen to indicate a brief outline of Vedantic Philosophy. Advaita Advaita means non-dual, one without the second. Specifically, it refers to the Vedantic philosophy advanced by Sankara. According to Sankara, Brahman the Absolute is the only reality. Advaita denies the permanent existence of the world and individual souls. Brahman Also Atman is described as pure consciousness (also known as sat, cit, ananda). Jiva The living being in the state of bondage and undergoing transmigration. According to Vedanta, the jiva is a reflection of the pure consciousness through buddhi, the intellect. The bondage is caused by ajnana or ignorance and jiva can get liberation through jnana or spiritual knowledge. Vrtti They are the waves constantly arise in the mind and are obstacles to yoga or perfect concentration on the Atman or Self. They can be directed toward Atman through Sadhana in the course of time. Sadhana Sadhana represents the means of spiritual enlightenment and the four sadhanas are Viveka (discrimination), vairagya (renunciation), samadi-satka (the group of six spiritual attributes), and mumukstutva (desire for liberation). Sankalpa Represents the general aspects of the functioning of manas, a resolve of the type, `I will do this,' `I shall have it,' etc. In Hindu religious rituals, sankalpa is the statement of the purpose and mode of performance of a ritual. Yoga Yoga is the mode of sadhana to keep the mind from vrtti (thouht waves). The word `yoga' derived from the root yuj has two senses: Samadhi or superconscious experience through concentration of the mind; yoking or uniting the individual self with God. Nirvikalpaka and Savikalpaka Vikalpa means distinction between `me,' the Brahman and the world. Nirvikalpaka means without distinctions. Savikalpaka means the persistence of the distinction between `me,' and `Brahman' and the world. Samadhi The total absorption in the object of concentration. In Vedanta the object is the unity of Atman with Brahman. Samadhi is of two kinds: savikalpaka and nirvikalpaka. In the savikalpaka samadhi the consciousness of one's own personality as distinct from Brahman, persists, however declined it may be. In the nirvikalpaka state, however, all awareness of multiplicity including that of oneself as distinct from Brahman is completely dissolved. Mukti, Mohsa, Kaivalya or Nirvana The state of freedom or liberation from all bonds due to ajnana (ignorance) or maya (illusory power). It is characterized by bliss and cessation of rebirths. Reference: "A Dictionary of Advaita Vedanta'" by Swami Harshananda, Ramakrishna Math, Bangalore, India. (This is an excellent reference book for those who want to be familiar with the words commonly used in Advaita Vedanta. This is available through Ramakrishna Mission Publications. warmest regards, Ram Chandran Note: In simplest term, Yoga Sadhana represents the conversion process by which a person from a materialistic life style to the spiritual life style. According to Gita this conversion is feasible if we adopt our life style with Karma yoga or bhakti yoga or jnana yoga. -- In advaitin, Brian Milnes <b.milnes@b...> wrote: > I believe that the most succinct answer to this question may be found by examining the Yoga Sutras of Patanjali. > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted July 30, 2001 Report Share Posted July 30, 2001 Thanks Shri Brian and Ram Chandran for your detailed responses. It was nice to read about Yoga as seen from slightly different perspectives. Any other members having other insights to offer on Yoga and Yoga siddhis are welcome to post their views. Any one wanting to comment of Yoga siddhis and their apparent conflict / conformity with modern scientific point of view is also welcome. Regards Shrinivas Make international calls for as low as $.04/minute with Messenger http://phonecard./ Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted July 31, 2001 Report Share Posted July 31, 2001 Brian Milnes [b.milnes] Monday, July 30, 2001 5:44 PM 'advaitin' RE: On Yoga I believe that the most succinct answer to this question may be found by examining the Yoga Sutras of Patanjali. Trust in your own experience as much as any of the commentators (although Shankara was very astute). If you don't have any - follow the guidance therein - the Sutras are like a bija, a seed of all knowledge. The Siddhis are just a feature of growing awareness, and may be experienced initially spontaneously, and later at will. ********************************** Where there is will involved, True Self-Realization is not being Recognized. Sages say that a person may be a great yogi with many developed powers and Siddhis, but not Self-Realized. Self-Realization can only happen when the *will itself* (to exist as a separate individual entity) has been surrendered at the feet of the Lord. This is why the saints say, "Not my will but thine my Lord". All these sayings have deep experiential meaning. Although it is true that Siddhis may be experienced spontaneously, Self-Realized sages unequivocally state that the desire for Siddhis, thinking of such things, and running after them are an hindrance to Self-Realization. Sri Ramana spoke on this many times and pointed out that all Siddhis involve exercise of the mind in some way. Self-Realization, however, requires absorption of the mind (on which the Siddhis depend for their existence) in the Heart and seeing through the complete unreality of the mind and its non-existence. Sage of Arunachala, Sri Ramana has stated clearly that Self-Realization is the only Siddhi worth having. Love to all Harsha Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted July 31, 2001 Report Share Posted July 31, 2001 > >Where there is will involved, True Self-Realization is not being Recognized. >Sages say that a person may be a great yogi with many developed powers and >Siddhis, but not Self-Realized. Self-Realization can only happen when the >*will itself* (to exist as a separate individual entity) has been >surrendered at the feet of the Lord. This is why the saints say, "Not my >will but thine my Lord". All these sayings have deep experiential meaning. > >Although it is true that Siddhis may be experienced spontaneously, >Self-Realized sages unequivocally state that the desire for Siddhis, >thinking of such things, and running after them are an hindrance to >Self-Realization. > >Sri Ramana spoke on this many times and pointed out that all Siddhis involve >exercise of the mind in some way. Self-Realization, however, requires >absorption of the mind (on which the Siddhis depend for their existence) in >the Heart and seeing through the complete unreality of the mind and its >non-existence. > >Sage of Arunachala, Sri Ramana has stated clearly that Self-Realization is >the only Siddhi worth having. > >Love to all >Harsha > Beautiful Harsha. If the root cause for bondage is the ignorance, then the only solution to the problem is the eradication of that ignorance. Hence appropriate knowledge is only the antidote for the problem at hand. Yoga siddhi-s are not a solution to the problem and in fact if those siddhi-s are not reinforced by appropriate knowledge, they become obstacles to the knowledge needed to solve the problem. It is like giving nuclear arsenal to a fanatic or pacifist who can blast others and ultimately himself. Siddhi-s centered on a mahaatma will bring auspiciousness to the world - like mahabali Hanumaan. For us who are trying to get over the suffering, they are more a burden and obstacles for one's growth. Hence anshTaanga yoga of pataanjali is not recommended for a vedantic student since they do not remove the ignorance which is the root cause but can even reinforce the ignorance by building up one's ego. Hence karma-bhakti-j~naana as yoga are recommended for sadhana. This is the major teaching of Krishna in B.Giita. Hari OM! Sadananda -- K. Sadananda Code 6323 Naval Research Laboratory Washington D.C. 20375 Voice (202)767-2117 Fax:(202)767-2623 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted July 31, 2001 Report Share Posted July 31, 2001 I believe that to concentrate on the differences between any of the six yoga darshanas is to make a fundamental error. Those systems are not irreconcilable, but just present a different aspect of "reality". As Rumi, that eloquent and enlightened Sufi poet says, "The roads are different, the goal is one ... When people come there, all quarrels or differences or disputes that happened along the road are resolved. Those who shouted at each other along the road 'You are wrong' or 'You are an unbeliever' forget their differences when they come there because there, all hearts are in unison." Patanjali's Yoga Sutras do not contradict Vedanta philosophy. They are more concise (than the Upanishads) and may, for many of us, need substantial commentaries to comprehend. The idea that practicing the Siddhis is a mistake, is another contentious issue. Patanjali explains the Siddhis in a sequential, even matter-of-fact way that in no way suggests that practising sanyama on a particular subject could be counter productive to enhancing one's awareness/spiritual growth. (Where are the "warnings" in the Sutras to NOT perform these exercises?) What seems to confuse the issue is any wilful exploitation of such powers to the advantage of the "exploiter" (or their ego). As Harsha reminds us: "Self-Realization can only happen when the *will itself* (to exist as a separate individual entity) has been surrendered at the feet of the Lord. This is why the saints say, "Not my will but thine my Lord"." Siddhis do NOT necessarily require the will of the individual to occur. I have had a small number of experiences, including knowing the mind of another and also "dispensing" compassion that were entirely non-wilful, and left me with the distinct question of "where did that come from"? There are similarly scores of recording instances of individuals capable of displaying Siddhi powers such as levitation, who had no comprehension of where the capability came from (some were clearly unable to easily control such capability, others were able to "perform" at will). The question of where these powers sit in regard to modern science can be illustrated by the work carried out by Robert Jahn, Brenda Dunne and their colleagues at Princeton Engineering Anomalies Research center at Princeton University. http://www.princeton.edu/~pear/ Their expansion of scientific research into the field of human consciousness reflects the move of science from Newtonian physics into Einstein's Relativity and Special Relativity and from there into Quantum Mechanics. The fact that we have no consensually agreed scientific framework on which we can hang these (still rarely witnessed and scientifically recorded) phenomena does NOT invalidate the experience of those to whom they have occurred. We will, in time, create an ability to consistently reproduce and record such events in such a way that the scientific community will be unable to reject the validity of such research. in the meantime, I recommend the following as a solid foundation for understanding the differences in the "Sad Darshana" (despite the Hare Krishna "bias"): http://www.iskcon.org/main/twohk/philo/roots/systems.htm Brian Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted August 2, 2001 Report Share Posted August 2, 2001 Namaste Sri Brianji, Thanks for your thoughtful post and the links. I am headed off to an academic conference in Washington D.C. and will be back next week but probably will not have the time to participate in list discussions for most of August. Sadaji, Sunderji, Ramji, Gregji, Frankji and other scholars/sages here can engage you on the six yoga darshnas as my knowledge is limited. Patanjali says in Samadhi Pada that "Now the Seer rests in His Own Nature." This is the same Nirvikalpa that is spoken of by Shankra in Vivekachudamani. Namaste and Love to all Harsha Brian Milnes [b.milnes] Tuesday, July 31, 2001 6:24 PM 'advaitin' RE: Re: On Yoga I believe that to concentrate on the differences between any of the six yoga darshanas is to make a fundamental error. Those systems are not irreconcilable, but just present a different aspect of "reality". As Rumi, that eloquent and enlightened Sufi poet says, "The roads are different, the goal is one ... When people come there, all quarrels or differences or disputes that happened along the road are resolved. Those who shouted at each other along the road 'You are wrong' or 'You are an unbeliever' forget their differences when they come there because there, all hearts are in unison." Patanjali's Yoga Sutras do not contradict Vedanta philosophy. They are more concise (than the Upanishads) and may, for many of us, need substantial commentaries to comprehend. The idea that practicing the Siddhis is a mistake, is another contentious issue. Patanjali explains the Siddhis in a sequential, even matter-of-fact way that in no way suggests that practising sanyama on a particular subject could be counter productive to enhancing one's awareness/spiritual growth. (Where are the "warnings" in the Sutras to NOT perform these exercises?) What seems to confuse the issue is any wilful exploitation of such powers to the advantage of the "exploiter" (or their ego). As Harsha reminds us: "Self-Realization can only happen when the *will itself* (to exist as a separate individual entity) has been surrendered at the feet of the Lord. This is why the saints say, "Not my will but thine my Lord"." Siddhis do NOT necessarily require the will of the individual to occur. I have had a small number of experiences, including knowing the mind of another and also "dispensing" compassion that were entirely non-wilful, and left me with the distinct question of "where did that come from"? There are similarly scores of recording instances of individuals capable of displaying Siddhi powers such as levitation, who had no comprehension of where the capability came from (some were clearly unable to easily control such capability, others were able to "perform" at will). The question of where these powers sit in regard to modern science can be illustrated by the work carried out by Robert Jahn, Brenda Dunne and their colleagues at Princeton Engineering Anomalies Research center at Princeton University. http://www.princeton.edu/~pear/ Their expansion of scientific research into the field of human consciousness reflects the move of science from Newtonian physics into Einstein's Relativity and Special Relativity and from there into Quantum Mechanics. The fact that we have no consensually agreed scientific framework on which we can hang these (still rarely witnessed and scientifically recorded) phenomena does NOT invalidate the experience of those to whom they have occurred. We will, in time, create an ability to consistently reproduce and record such events in such a way that the scientific community will be unable to reject the validity of such research. in the meantime, I recommend the following as a solid foundation for understanding the differences in the "Sad Darshana" (despite the Hare Krishna "bias"): http://www.iskcon.org/main/twohk/philo/roots/systems.htm Brian Discussion of Shankara's Advaita Vedanta Philosophy of nonseparablity of Atman and Brahman. Advaitin List Archives available at: http://www.eScribe.com/culture/advaitin/ To Post a message send an email to : advaitin Messages Archived at: advaitin/messages Your use of is subject to Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted August 4, 2001 Report Share Posted August 4, 2001 Greetings Svetasvatara Upanishad contains some great insights into Yoga from a Vedantic point of view: Yada carmavadakasam vestayisyanti manavah; tada sivamavijnaya dukhasyanto bhavisyati. (VI.20) When men can roll up the entire sky as if it was a piece of mat, then without knowing the Luminous Lord human suffering will end. When such an impossible thing happens (roll up the entire sky as a piece of mat), then it will be possible to attain happiness without knowing Brahman. The same Upanishad explains the process to realize Brahman from a Yoga standpoint: Svadehamaranim krtva pranavam cottararanim; Dhyananirmathanaabhyasaddevam pasyennigudhavat. (I.14) Svadeham krtva - treat your own body; aranim - as the lower stick; pranavam ca uttaranim - Om as the upper stick; dhyana-nirmathana-abhyasat - meditate on the luminous Self as if you are rubbing the two sticks; devam - the Luminous Self pasyet nigudhavat - see as if hidden deep inside [like fire in firewood] You should think of your body as the lower stick and pranva, Om, as the upper one. Meditate as if you are rubbing the two sticks together. If you go on doing this, you will be able to see within yourself the luminous Self, which is hidden like fire in firewood. Vahneryatha yonigatasya murtirna drsyate naiva ca linganasah; Sa bhuya evendhanayonigrhya- stadvobhayam vai pranaena dehe. (I.13) Wood is the source of fire. You see this fire only when you rub two pieces of wood against each other. But even when you do not see it, the fire exists in the wood. In the same manner, the self is always within us. We realize that Self when we meditate on it with the help of pranava, Om. regards Sundar Rajan advaitin, Shrinivas Gadkari <sgadkari2001> wrote: > Greetings, > > How would one define Yoga from a Vedantic > point of View ? > > How would one expalin Yoga Siddhis (Yogic Powers) ? > > Could I request the memebers of this forum to > offer their views on these topics. > > Regards > Shrinivas > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted August 7, 2001 Report Share Posted August 7, 2001 Namaste Hi all. My name is Pablo and I'm form Argentina. I'm reading the mesagges, are all very interesant. I don't write for my english scripture is not good. I would ask to Brian Milnes if he can send the complete translation of Patanjali's Yogasutras that he quoted. I had nine translations but all this are dualistic. I don't know if someone have other non/dualistic translation... Thank you. Regards. Pablo _______ ¿Lo probaste? Correo gratis y para toda la vida en http://correo..ar Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted August 8, 2001 Report Share Posted August 8, 2001 Hi Pablo, The quotations that I used were from my own translation, and currently this is unfinished work - I've only done about 20%. I can't see any evidence that Patanjali was too concerned about the dualistic non/dualistic argument, so it wouldn't be something that worried me in translating. More important I think, to try and follow his guidance in achieving liberation. Best Regards Brian | Namaste | | Hi all. My name is Pablo and I'm form Argentina. I'm | reading the mesagges, are all very interesant. I don't | write for my english scripture is not good. | | I would ask to Brian Milnes if he can send the | complete translation of Patanjali's Yogasutras that he | quoted. | I had nine translations but all this are dualistic. I | don't know if someone have other non/dualistic | translation... | | Thank you. | | Regards. | | Pablo | | | | | | _______ | ¿Lo probaste? | Correo gratis y para toda la vida en http://correo..ar | | | ------------------------ Sponsor | ---------------------~--> | Small business owners... | Tell us what you think! | http://us.click./vO1FAB/txzCAA/ySSFAA/XUWolB/TM | ---------------------------- | --------~-> | | Discussion of Shankara's Advaita Vedanta Philosophy of | nonseparablity of Atman and Brahman. | Advaitin List Archives available at: http://www.eScribe.com/culture/advaitin/ To Post a message send an email to : advaitin Messages Archived at: advaitin/messages Your use of is subject to Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.