Guest guest Posted September 1, 2001 Report Share Posted September 1, 2001 Namaste All, Re: Deep Sleep, it reminded me of this post I did on . Especially re Formless Saguna Brahman. Well not totally for there must be a mind otherwise it would be Nirguna. As Jody mentioned Ramakrishna, I thought I would revisit some of my old books on him, from years ago. The first book and the first page I opened was right on the topic I intended to post on.!!!!!!!?? As Jody and I had discussed this subject. " I began to meditate on the Primal Purusha, the indivisible Sat-Cit-Ananda, regarding myself as His handmaiden." p 53 'Visions of Ramakrishna'. ';it was not at all uncommon for Ramakrishna to use terms like this for the Personal God without form.' ( Saguna Brahman, for impersonal is Nirguna Brahman.) Swami Yogeshananda. This was prior to the arrival of Tota Puri to the ashram, and Ramakrishna's first Nirvikalpa Samadhi, where he cut through the image of Kali to Nirguna Brahman. p55.56. So here we have perhaps the root of the confusion on these concepts on this list. There is a formless Saguna Brahman with attributes, and there is the Formless Nirguna Brahman without attributes, according to Ramakrishna Paramahamsa. There is no doubt that Ramakrishna in using the term Sat-Cit-Ananda is refering to Saguna Brahman and not Nirguna Brahman. As a last note. RK saw only the universal as the mind of every individual, animal and plant when he had particular visions. Om Namah Sivaya......Tony. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.