Guest guest Posted October 2, 2001 Report Share Posted October 2, 2001 Namaste All, Here is an attempt to post a few mini-essays on the relation between the views of modern science and the Vedas. Comments are most welcome. If some reader feels the presentation is flawed, please bring it to my notice. Physics and Yoga In my opinion, if the relation between yoga and physics is addressed, it should go a long way in understanding Vedas in general. Let us take up the core issue to start with: How do yoga siddhis fit in with our understanding of physics ? Is the concept of yoga siddhis at conflict with the scientific view of the world ? Consider a table with a pen on it. The pen is at the left end of the table. Without physically doing anything, by thoughts alone is it possible for the pen to be 'teleported' to the right end of the table ? Yoga sutras assert that such things are possible and the suggested technique is a particular meditation that Patanjali terms 'Samayama'. Almost all of us have heard accounts of advanced yogis perform such feats. Shri Satya Sai Baba for example is attributed fantastic powers. Based on classical physics such a phenomenon is impossible. However in quantum physics, which in fact is the contemporary point of view, such phenomena are not ruled out. In quantum physics, for any situation one can in principle write down a wave equation. Wave equation describes the evolution of the state of a physical system. The initial knowledge that we have about the system constitutes the initial state of the system. The wave equation then allows us to compute the probability that the system will be in some particular state. In the above example one can write an equation for the system consisting of the table, chair, air in the room, wall, floor and ceiling (say we restrict the list to just these objects). The initial state of the system is the pen being on the left corner of the table. Let us use the wave equation to compute the probabilities of the following two states: State 1. The next second the pen is on the left corner of the table. State 2. The next second the pen is on the right corner of the table. I have not done the math, but I am quite sure that if one were to do the math (which would be impossibly complicated) we would get: Prob(State 1) = P1 ~ 1 Prob(State 2) = P2 ~ 0 (~ represents approximately). Important point is, P2 though vanishingly small, is not zero. Even more important point is, quantum theory has no control on which of the states the system will be observed in. The most unfortunate point is hardly any physicist makes any serious attempt to inquire into this. Ordinarily an observation will result is State 1 but on rare occasions one might observe the system is State 2. Say we observe the system the state 2 what happens after that, do we momentarily see the system in state 2 and then the system reverts back to state 1 ? No, on observation the evolution of the system stop, also known as collapse of the wave function. We now have to formulate a new wave equation, with state 2 as the initial state of the system. Now this wave equation will have P2 ~ 1, and P1 ~ 0. That is if we succeed in observing the pen once on the right corner, most likely all subsequent observations will correspond to the system in state 2. If one were to bring mind into the picture, and postulate that it is some activity of the mind that is responsible for choosing which state would be really observed, it would NOT AT ALL be in contradiction with physics. Such an approach would in fact complement the quantum theory. More later ..... Warm regards Shrinivas Listen to your Mail messages from any phone. http://phone. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.