Guest guest Posted October 22, 2001 Report Share Posted October 22, 2001 On Mon, 22 Oct 2001, Madhava K. Turumella wrote: > Yes you are right, I came accross an upanishad called "AllOpanishad" which > is claimed to be a part of Atharvana Veda. But scholars discarded its > authenticity with the help of "MouktikOpanshad". Interestingly, in this > context only schlolars have opined that Atharvana veda is a later veda, > while discarding Allopanishad from the Veda. In Mouktikopanishad there are > 108 statements taken from 108 upanishads. It is told to Lord Hanuma by Lord > Rama. So we take these 108 upanishads only as authentic. Out of them 10 > are very important. > > EsakEna kathaH prasna muNda mAMDookya taittiri > aitarEyaMca chAMdOgyaM bRUhadAraNyakaM daSa. > > Yours, > Madhava > > namaste shri Madhava, I have a question on mouktika upanishad. I was looking for the text of mouktika upanishad for some time (the upanishad told to Lord Hanuma by Lord Rama). Is the text of this upanishad available on the internet at the sanskrit or the hindunet site? I wonder if you or shri sunderji can give an internet reference site where I can access the text of this (mouktika) upanishad. Thanks very much. Regards Gummuluru Murthy ---- Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted October 22, 2001 Report Share Posted October 22, 2001 Yes you are right, I came accross an upanishad called "AllOpanishad" which is claimed to be a part of Atharvana Veda. But scholars discarded its authenticity with the help of "MouktikOpanshad". Interestingly, in this context only schlolars have opined that Atharvana veda is a later veda, while discarding Allopanishad from the Veda. In Mouktikopanishad there are 108 statements taken from 108 upanishads. It is told to Lord Hanuma by Lord Rama. So we take these 108 upanishads only as authentic. Out of them 10 are very important. EsakEna kathaH prasna muNda mAMDookya taittiri aitarEyaMca chAMdOgyaM bRUhadAraNyakaM daSa. Yours, Madhava > -----Ursprungliche Nachricht----- > Von: Narayanan.K.G [courtallam] > Gesendet: Monday, October 22, 2001 4:20 PM > An: advaitin > Betreff: Atharvana Veda > > > 22-Oct > > Namaste! > > In one of the issues of Mother India (Aurobindo > Ashram's monthly journal), I read an article ( I don't > remember the exact month of issue and the author's > name. I'll try to find it out) which says that the > "ATHARVANA SUKTA" contains words like "mahamad" and > "allahu akabar". The author opines that the sukta > equated "allah" with "parameswara". > > Is this true? Can anybody in the list throw more light > on this please? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted October 23, 2001 Report Share Posted October 23, 2001 Hare Krishna pranam I vaguely remember, in a discourse shataavadhani Sri R. Ganesh said that *allopanishad* is all about durga/ambaa maatha. In sanskrit *alla*, *akka* *amma* are all synonyms. Any help from Sri Suder prabhuji on this upanishad & its teaching?? Thanks in advance. Hari Hari Hari Bol!! bhaskar Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.