Guest guest Posted November 12, 2001 Report Share Posted November 12, 2001 That was an answer from the objective stand point of view. It is answering *somebody* who is thinking that something came/brought out of it. The question was "if this universe *came out* of Brahman, then where is Brahman" the answerer tries to make the questionner understand by using such words like "Even though, this came out of that, that remains the same". > -----Ursprungliche Nachricht----- > Von: hemant paranjape [hvparanjape] > Gesendet: Thursday, September 27, 2001 5:53 AM > An: advaitin > Betreff: Re: > > > Namaste, > > > There is, in fact, no need for Brahman to send a > > part > > of himself and He, in reality does not do so at all! > > > > There is a famous richa in upnishadas which says > "purnasya purnam aadaya purnamevavashishyate" Does is > not mean that there is a notion of subtraction from > brahman (even though that subtraction leaves brahman > unchanged) > > Hemant. > > > > > > Listen to your Mail messages from any phone. > http://phone. > > > ------------------------ Sponsor > ---------------------~--> > FREE COLLEGE MONEY > CLICK HERE to search > 600,000 scholarships! > http://us.click./ujOgTC/4m7CAA/ySSFAA/XUWolB/TM > ----------------------------- > -------~-> > > Discussion of Shankara's Advaita Vedanta Philosophy of > nonseparablity of Atman and Brahman. > Advaitin List Archives available at: > http://www.eScribe.com/culture/advaitin/ > To Post a message send an email to : advaitin > Messages Archived at: advaitin/messages > > > > Your use of is subject to > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.