Jump to content
IndiaDivine.org

Initiation of Sri Bhagavan

Rate this topic


Guest guest

Recommended Posts

The Mountain Path

Vol. 2 - OCTOBER 1965 - No. 4

 

Initiation Rejected

By Nagamma

 

13-1-1949:

 

 

For readers who do not know the background of the following story it should

be explained that the great Shankaracharya, the 8th Century restorer of

Advaita Vedanta, founded four orders of sannyasins in the four corners of

India, north, south, east and west. A regular succession of gurus continued

in these orders and became the upholders of Hindu orthodoxy. Every sannyasin

is supposed to receive initiation and normally from an initiate of one of

them. That is to say that a man cannot simply take sannyas; it has to be

bestowed on him. Similarly a man is not supposed to act as a guru unless he

himself has received initiation. The position of Bhagavan, living as a

sannyasin and acting as a guru, was therefore technically incorrect. The

point of the story is that he was above technicalities and was fully aware

of the fact.

 

 

There was talk in Bhagavan's presence about a conference of the heads of

mutts at Sivaganga, and in this connection a devotee said to Bhagavan: "It

is said that a long time ago somebody from Sringeri Peetam came and asked

Bhagavan to take initiation. Is that so?"

 

 

Bhagavan replied "Yes, indeed. In the early days of my stay at Virupaksha

Cave a shastri from Sringeri Mutt came to see me one morning. He spoke with

me for a long time and fully understood what I said to him; then, before

going into town for food, he approached me with folded hands and an air of

devotion and said: `Swami, I have a request to make; please consider it.' I

asked what it was and he replied with great humility and an air of

submission: `Swami, as you were born a Brahmin, is it not necessary that you

should receive diksha (initiation) according to the sastras? Isn't that our

ancient tradition? This is not unknown to you, so what need is there for me

to explain? It is our wish to include your name also in the list we already

have in the stanzas in praise of gurus. So if Bhagavan consents arrangements

will be made to bring the necessary things and perform the rite here. Even

if you don't want to wear the full ochre robe, you could at least wear an

ochre loin-cloth (instead of the white one you wear now). Please give it

your earnest consideration while I go down into the town for my midday meal

and let me have your answer when I come back at 3 o'clock. The people at our

Mutt have heard of your great reputation and sent me here to speak with you

about it.' So saying, he went down the hill into town.

 

 

"Soon after he had left an old Brahmin came with a bundle that seemed to

contain books. His face seemed somehow familiar. He put the bundle down as

though he already knew me and said: `Swami, I have just come and not even

taken my bath yet. There is no one to look after this bundle, so please look

after it.' So saying, he went away.

 

 

"As soon as he had gone it occurred to me for some reason to open the bundle

and look at the books. On opening it I was immediately struck by the title

`Arunachala Mahatmyam' (The Greatness of Arunachala) in Sanskrit on one of

them. I was not previously aware that this Tamil work existed in a Sanskrit

version also. I opened the book and my eye fell immediately on the stanza in

which Ishvara, (God) says: `Those who live within three yojanas (thirty

miles) of this place (Arunachala) will attain Liberation free from all

attachments even if they have not received initiation. Such is my decree.'

 

 

"Seeing this, I said to myself: Splendid now I have a good answer to give to

that shastri. So I copied the sloka out and tied the bundle up again as it

was before. Then I sat in meditation. When I opened my eyes again the bundle

was gone. When the shastri returned in the afternoon I showed him the

stanza. Being a learned man he saw at once that there was nothing he could

say against it, so he bowed down before me with great respect and devotion

and left. It seems that he told the whole story to the Shankaracharya

Narasimha Bharati and the latter regretted the episode and told his

followers to make no such attempts in future.

 

 

"There were a number of other occasions too when people came and tried to

convert me to their ways. I used to listen to all they had to say but would

never consent to take initiation. I always found some excuse such as this to

get out of it."

 

 

One of the devotees asked whether the old Brahmin who brought the bundle of

books returned.

 

 

Bhagavan said: "I don't remember whether he did or not. I only know that the

bundle was not there. We got what we needed. Isn't that enough? It means

that Arunachala Himself appeared in that guise."

 

 

He then remained silent.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Namaste,

 

This excerpt from the Mountain Path journal may likely create

the wrong impression that Sri Narasimha Bharati had sent the Shastri

to Sri Ramana. This was not the case.

 

The original translation, by D.S. Sharma, of Suri Nagamma's

'Letters from Sri Ramanashram'[Vol. I & II, 1973], p. 368, has these

words:

 

"Narasimha Bharathi felt very sorry for what his disciples had done,

and told them to stop all further efforts in that direction."

 

'Arunachala Mahatmya', and the verse it contained was:

 

yojana-traya-maatre asmin kshetre nivasataaM nR^iNaam.h |

diikshaa aadikaM vinaa api astu mat saayujyaM mama aaj~nyaa ||

 

"Those who live within 24 miles of this place, i.e. this Arunachala

Hill, will get my Sayujyam, i.e. absorption into Me, freed from all

bonds, even if they do not take any Diksha. This is my order."

 

Also when asked if Narasimha Bharati had visited him, Sri Ramana said

that he had greatly wished to pay a visit but people around him had

prevented this. That was the fate of Mathadhipatis! They are like

prisoners! He [Ramana] himself compared his status to a prisoner as he

had to abide by what others around him wanted him to do!!

 

It should also be noted that Narasimha Bharathi had the highest regard

for Ramana, and used to refer to him as a 'baala-yogii' [the child

Master]. An incident is related [elsewhere] where one of his devotees

was pleasantly surprised to be asked whether he had paid a visit to

the 'baala-yogii', as the devotee had doubts about Ramana's stature!

 

Regards,

 

Sunder

 

 

advaitin, "Harsha" <harsha-hkl@h...> wrote:

> The Mountain Path

> Vol. 2 - OCTOBER 1965 - No. 4

>

> Initiation Rejected

> By Nagamma

>

> 13-1-1949:

>

>

> It seems that he told the whole story to the

Shankaracharya

> Narasimha Bharati and the latter regretted the episode and told his

> followers to make no such attempts in future.

>

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Thank you Sunderji for the clarification. The original translation was from

the Mountain Path which was published by Ramanasharam.

What you say makes sense to me. I believe at least two other Shankracharyas

did find the time to sit at the feet of Sri Ramana.

 

I wonder how that is interpreted by the traditional scholars of Vedas who

may feel that the Sri Ramana's teachings are not in accord with the

Upanishads and Sri Shankra's teachings.

 

Perhaps Sri Atmachaitanyaji or others can give their views on that.

 

Love to all

Harsha

 

 

sunderh [sunderh]

Friday, December 14, 2001 9:43 AM

advaitin

Re: Initiation of Sri Bhagavan

 

 

Namaste,

 

This excerpt from the Mountain Path journal may likely create

the wrong impression that Sri Narasimha Bharati had sent the Shastri

to Sri Ramana. This was not the case.

 

The original translation, by D.S. Sharma, of Suri Nagamma's

'Letters from Sri Ramanashram'[Vol. I & II, 1973], p. 368, has these

words:

 

"Narasimha Bharathi felt very sorry for what his disciples had done,

and told them to stop all further efforts in that direction."

 

'Arunachala Mahatmya', and the verse it contained was:

 

yojana-traya-maatre asmin kshetre nivasataaM nR^iNaam.h |

diikshaa aadikaM vinaa api astu mat saayujyaM mama aaj~nyaa ||

 

"Those who live within 24 miles of this place, i.e. this Arunachala

Hill, will get my Sayujyam, i.e. absorption into Me, freed from all

bonds, even if they do not take any Diksha. This is my order."

 

Also when asked if Narasimha Bharati had visited him, Sri Ramana said

that he had greatly wished to pay a visit but people around him had

prevented this. That was the fate of Mathadhipatis! They are like

prisoners! He [Ramana] himself compared his status to a prisoner as he

had to abide by what others around him wanted him to do!!

 

It should also be noted that Narasimha Bharathi had the highest regard

for Ramana, and used to refer to him as a 'baala-yogii' [the child

Master]. An incident is related [elsewhere] where one of his devotees

was pleasantly surprised to be asked whether he had paid a visit to

the 'baala-yogii', as the devotee had doubts about Ramana's stature!

 

Regards,

 

Sunder

 

 

advaitin, "Harsha" <harsha-hkl@h...> wrote:

> The Mountain Path

> Vol. 2 - OCTOBER 1965 - No. 4

>

> Initiation Rejected

> By Nagamma

>

> 13-1-1949:

>

>

> It seems that he told the whole story to the

Shankaracharya

> Narasimha Bharati and the latter regretted the episode and told his

> followers to make no such attempts in future.

>

 

 

 

 

Discussion of Shankara's Advaita Vedanta Philosophy of nonseparablity of

Atman and Brahman.

Advaitin List Archives available at:

http://www.eScribe.com/culture/advaitin/

To Post a message send an email to : advaitin

Messages Archived at: advaitin/messages

 

 

 

Your use of is subject to

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Namaste Harshaji,

 

I seriously doubt that anyone has proved that Sri Ramana's

teachings are not in accord with the Upanishads. In fact you may

recall reading how Kanchi Paramacharya sent Paul Brunton [through a

vivid dream] to him for instruction. Narasimha Bharati, of Sringeri

Math, has already been mentioned as whole-heartedly recommending the

visits to his devotees. Sri Ramana comes under the category of

'ati-ashrami', like Dattatreya, and many others. Their lives and

teachings have confirmed in every way what the Upanishads teach.

 

For adepts at that level, personal visits are only a

formality for the sake of their devotees, like Narayana Guru and many

others. Kanchi Paramacharya did the Arunachala pradakshina, but did

not meet Sri Ramana personally.

 

I suppose jivanmuktas' biographies can never reveal what

work they do in the non-physical dimensions! On the mundane level they

seem to generate enough curiosity among the masses to draw their

attention to a more sublime or divine way of life!!

 

 

Regards,

 

Sunder

 

 

 

 

 

advaitin, "Harsha" <harsha-hkl@h...> wrote:

>

> I wonder how that is interpreted by the traditional scholars of

Vedas who

> may feel that the Sri Ramana's teachings are not in accord with the

> Upanishads and Sri Shankra's teachings.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The following information from 'The Mountain Path' (Journal from

Ramana Ashram) of this years Jayanthi issue may help clarify that

Sri Ramana's stature was well known to Sri Siva Narasimha Bharati

Swamigal, then Sankaracharya of Sringeri and if I may add, a great

Yogi and Jivanmukta Himself.

 

The Sringeri Guru Parampara, established directly by Adi Sankara,

has been adorned by equally great JivanMuktas such as Vidyaranya and

has helped many a seeker acheive the highest goal.

 

As Sri Paramarthananda (yogamalika.org) says in His summary of sixth

chapter, every spiritual genius in this birth is a Yoga Bhrasta

(fallen Yogi) of past lives.

 

Sri Ramana was obviously such an advanced aspirant from His previous

births that knowledge dawned on Him very quickly in this birth.

 

But He is not the only JivanMukta there will be. As Lord Krishna

says while thousands may strive a few will reach Him. Even though it

is a very small number there have been realized sould since Ramana's

time and will continue to be.

 

 

 

================== Mountain Path ================================

 

There was a young man studying Sanskrit and sacred lore at

Chidambaram. After finishing his course of studies there he went to

Sringeri to hear Vedanta explained by the famous HH Narasimha

Bharati

Swami[1879-1912, 33rd Pontiff of Sringeri]. The Swami condescended

to

teach him though he had just then intended to stop teaching and

retire into solitude for meditation. Once, at the end of the day's

lesson, the Swami remarked, "We study scriptures and commentaries on

them. They no doubt clarify one's understanding and help one

spiritually; but they are only secondary.The main thing is one's

spiritual ripeness. One who is already spiritually evolved need not

go through the scriptures and commentaries on them. Such a one gets

illuminated in a flash without these aids.The Bala Yogi of

Tiruvannamalai is an instance here." The student had heard of the

Brahmana Swami (Sri Bhagvan as he was then known) while at

Chidambaram, but had thought it was all a hoax. And so he was

stunned

to hear such profound appreciation of Bhagvan from the lips of his

venerable master and resolved to go and have darshan of Bhagvan

before long.

 

================== Mountain Path ================================

 

regards

Sundar Rajan

 

advaitin, "sunderh" <sunderh> wrote:

> Namaste,

>

> This excerpt from the Mountain Path journal may likely

create

> the wrong impression that Sri Narasimha Bharati had sent the

Shastri

> to Sri Ramana. This was not the case.

>

> The original translation, by D.S. Sharma, of Suri

Nagamma's

> 'Letters from Sri Ramanashram'[Vol. I & II, 1973], p. 368, has

these

> words:

>

> "Narasimha Bharathi felt very sorry for what his disciples had

done,

> and told them to stop all further efforts in that direction."

>

> 'Arunachala Mahatmya', and the verse it contained was:

>

> yojana-traya-maatre asmin kshetre nivasataaM nR^iNaam.h |

> diikshaa aadikaM vinaa api astu mat saayujyaM mama aaj~nyaa ||

>

> "Those who live within 24 miles of this place, i.e. this

Arunachala

> Hill, will get my Sayujyam, i.e. absorption into Me, freed from

all

> bonds, even if they do not take any Diksha. This is my order."

>

> Also when asked if Narasimha Bharati had visited him, Sri Ramana

said

> that he had greatly wished to pay a visit but people around him

had

> prevented this. That was the fate of Mathadhipatis! They are like

> prisoners! He [Ramana] himself compared his status to a prisoner

as he

> had to abide by what others around him wanted him to do!!

>

> It should also be noted that Narasimha Bharathi had the highest

regard

> for Ramana, and used to refer to him as a 'baala-yogii' [the child

> Master]. An incident is related [elsewhere] where one of his

devotees

> was pleasantly surprised to be asked whether he had paid a visit

to

> the 'baala-yogii', as the devotee had doubts about Ramana's

stature!

>

> Regards,

>

> Sunder

>

>

> advaitin, "Harsha" <harsha-hkl@h...> wrote:

> > The Mountain Path

> > Vol. 2 - OCTOBER 1965 - No. 4

> >

> > Initiation Rejected

> > By Nagamma

> >

> > 13-1-1949:

> >

> >

> > It seems that he told the whole story to the

> Shankaracharya

> > Narasimha Bharati and the latter regretted the episode and told

his

> > followers to make no such attempts in future.

> >

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Namaste,

 

The answer to the question how 'brahma-jnanis' meet, is

revealed in the following episode!

 

http://kamakoti.org/souv/5-58.html

 

"Jagadguru Sri Sankaracharya of Kanchi Kamakoti Peetham was now (end

of Oct. 1947) camping near Tiruvannamalai. Someone asked whether His

Holiness and Sri Bhagavan ever met. Sri Bhagavan replied: "When were

we separate that we should not meet? We are always together."

Actually, `togetherness' was only `oneness to that Advaita Jnani.

Their unity in the sublimity of Advaita may be out of our

comprehension. Both are identical in their utter simplicity born of

that very sublimity. Her we can certainly understand, admire and adore

the oneness of the Maha-Svami and the Maharishi and exclaim "O sancta

simplicitas ! (O holy simplicity!)"

 

Many other personal experiences with Kanchi Paramacharya [a shrotriya,

brahmanishtha, sanyasi] are at URL:

 

http://kamakoti.org/newlayout/souvenir.html

 

Regards,

 

Sunder

 

 

 

 

advaitin, Anand Natarajan <harihara.geo> wrote:

>

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
×
  • Create New...