Guest guest Posted December 12, 2001 Report Share Posted December 12, 2001 The Mountain Path Vol. 2 - OCTOBER 1965 - No. 4 Initiation Rejected By Nagamma 13-1-1949: For readers who do not know the background of the following story it should be explained that the great Shankaracharya, the 8th Century restorer of Advaita Vedanta, founded four orders of sannyasins in the four corners of India, north, south, east and west. A regular succession of gurus continued in these orders and became the upholders of Hindu orthodoxy. Every sannyasin is supposed to receive initiation and normally from an initiate of one of them. That is to say that a man cannot simply take sannyas; it has to be bestowed on him. Similarly a man is not supposed to act as a guru unless he himself has received initiation. The position of Bhagavan, living as a sannyasin and acting as a guru, was therefore technically incorrect. The point of the story is that he was above technicalities and was fully aware of the fact. There was talk in Bhagavan's presence about a conference of the heads of mutts at Sivaganga, and in this connection a devotee said to Bhagavan: "It is said that a long time ago somebody from Sringeri Peetam came and asked Bhagavan to take initiation. Is that so?" Bhagavan replied "Yes, indeed. In the early days of my stay at Virupaksha Cave a shastri from Sringeri Mutt came to see me one morning. He spoke with me for a long time and fully understood what I said to him; then, before going into town for food, he approached me with folded hands and an air of devotion and said: `Swami, I have a request to make; please consider it.' I asked what it was and he replied with great humility and an air of submission: `Swami, as you were born a Brahmin, is it not necessary that you should receive diksha (initiation) according to the sastras? Isn't that our ancient tradition? This is not unknown to you, so what need is there for me to explain? It is our wish to include your name also in the list we already have in the stanzas in praise of gurus. So if Bhagavan consents arrangements will be made to bring the necessary things and perform the rite here. Even if you don't want to wear the full ochre robe, you could at least wear an ochre loin-cloth (instead of the white one you wear now). Please give it your earnest consideration while I go down into the town for my midday meal and let me have your answer when I come back at 3 o'clock. The people at our Mutt have heard of your great reputation and sent me here to speak with you about it.' So saying, he went down the hill into town. "Soon after he had left an old Brahmin came with a bundle that seemed to contain books. His face seemed somehow familiar. He put the bundle down as though he already knew me and said: `Swami, I have just come and not even taken my bath yet. There is no one to look after this bundle, so please look after it.' So saying, he went away. "As soon as he had gone it occurred to me for some reason to open the bundle and look at the books. On opening it I was immediately struck by the title `Arunachala Mahatmyam' (The Greatness of Arunachala) in Sanskrit on one of them. I was not previously aware that this Tamil work existed in a Sanskrit version also. I opened the book and my eye fell immediately on the stanza in which Ishvara, (God) says: `Those who live within three yojanas (thirty miles) of this place (Arunachala) will attain Liberation free from all attachments even if they have not received initiation. Such is my decree.' "Seeing this, I said to myself: Splendid now I have a good answer to give to that shastri. So I copied the sloka out and tied the bundle up again as it was before. Then I sat in meditation. When I opened my eyes again the bundle was gone. When the shastri returned in the afternoon I showed him the stanza. Being a learned man he saw at once that there was nothing he could say against it, so he bowed down before me with great respect and devotion and left. It seems that he told the whole story to the Shankaracharya Narasimha Bharati and the latter regretted the episode and told his followers to make no such attempts in future. "There were a number of other occasions too when people came and tried to convert me to their ways. I used to listen to all they had to say but would never consent to take initiation. I always found some excuse such as this to get out of it." One of the devotees asked whether the old Brahmin who brought the bundle of books returned. Bhagavan said: "I don't remember whether he did or not. I only know that the bundle was not there. We got what we needed. Isn't that enough? It means that Arunachala Himself appeared in that guise." He then remained silent. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted December 14, 2001 Report Share Posted December 14, 2001 Namaste, This excerpt from the Mountain Path journal may likely create the wrong impression that Sri Narasimha Bharati had sent the Shastri to Sri Ramana. This was not the case. The original translation, by D.S. Sharma, of Suri Nagamma's 'Letters from Sri Ramanashram'[Vol. I & II, 1973], p. 368, has these words: "Narasimha Bharathi felt very sorry for what his disciples had done, and told them to stop all further efforts in that direction." 'Arunachala Mahatmya', and the verse it contained was: yojana-traya-maatre asmin kshetre nivasataaM nR^iNaam.h | diikshaa aadikaM vinaa api astu mat saayujyaM mama aaj~nyaa || "Those who live within 24 miles of this place, i.e. this Arunachala Hill, will get my Sayujyam, i.e. absorption into Me, freed from all bonds, even if they do not take any Diksha. This is my order." Also when asked if Narasimha Bharati had visited him, Sri Ramana said that he had greatly wished to pay a visit but people around him had prevented this. That was the fate of Mathadhipatis! They are like prisoners! He [Ramana] himself compared his status to a prisoner as he had to abide by what others around him wanted him to do!! It should also be noted that Narasimha Bharathi had the highest regard for Ramana, and used to refer to him as a 'baala-yogii' [the child Master]. An incident is related [elsewhere] where one of his devotees was pleasantly surprised to be asked whether he had paid a visit to the 'baala-yogii', as the devotee had doubts about Ramana's stature! Regards, Sunder advaitin, "Harsha" <harsha-hkl@h...> wrote: > The Mountain Path > Vol. 2 - OCTOBER 1965 - No. 4 > > Initiation Rejected > By Nagamma > > 13-1-1949: > > > It seems that he told the whole story to the Shankaracharya > Narasimha Bharati and the latter regretted the episode and told his > followers to make no such attempts in future. > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted December 14, 2001 Report Share Posted December 14, 2001 Thank you Sunderji for the clarification. The original translation was from the Mountain Path which was published by Ramanasharam. What you say makes sense to me. I believe at least two other Shankracharyas did find the time to sit at the feet of Sri Ramana. I wonder how that is interpreted by the traditional scholars of Vedas who may feel that the Sri Ramana's teachings are not in accord with the Upanishads and Sri Shankra's teachings. Perhaps Sri Atmachaitanyaji or others can give their views on that. Love to all Harsha sunderh [sunderh] Friday, December 14, 2001 9:43 AM advaitin Re: Initiation of Sri Bhagavan Namaste, This excerpt from the Mountain Path journal may likely create the wrong impression that Sri Narasimha Bharati had sent the Shastri to Sri Ramana. This was not the case. The original translation, by D.S. Sharma, of Suri Nagamma's 'Letters from Sri Ramanashram'[Vol. I & II, 1973], p. 368, has these words: "Narasimha Bharathi felt very sorry for what his disciples had done, and told them to stop all further efforts in that direction." 'Arunachala Mahatmya', and the verse it contained was: yojana-traya-maatre asmin kshetre nivasataaM nR^iNaam.h | diikshaa aadikaM vinaa api astu mat saayujyaM mama aaj~nyaa || "Those who live within 24 miles of this place, i.e. this Arunachala Hill, will get my Sayujyam, i.e. absorption into Me, freed from all bonds, even if they do not take any Diksha. This is my order." Also when asked if Narasimha Bharati had visited him, Sri Ramana said that he had greatly wished to pay a visit but people around him had prevented this. That was the fate of Mathadhipatis! They are like prisoners! He [Ramana] himself compared his status to a prisoner as he had to abide by what others around him wanted him to do!! It should also be noted that Narasimha Bharathi had the highest regard for Ramana, and used to refer to him as a 'baala-yogii' [the child Master]. An incident is related [elsewhere] where one of his devotees was pleasantly surprised to be asked whether he had paid a visit to the 'baala-yogii', as the devotee had doubts about Ramana's stature! Regards, Sunder advaitin, "Harsha" <harsha-hkl@h...> wrote: > The Mountain Path > Vol. 2 - OCTOBER 1965 - No. 4 > > Initiation Rejected > By Nagamma > > 13-1-1949: > > > It seems that he told the whole story to the Shankaracharya > Narasimha Bharati and the latter regretted the episode and told his > followers to make no such attempts in future. > Discussion of Shankara's Advaita Vedanta Philosophy of nonseparablity of Atman and Brahman. Advaitin List Archives available at: http://www.eScribe.com/culture/advaitin/ To Post a message send an email to : advaitin Messages Archived at: advaitin/messages Your use of is subject to Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted December 14, 2001 Report Share Posted December 14, 2001 Namaste Harshaji, I seriously doubt that anyone has proved that Sri Ramana's teachings are not in accord with the Upanishads. In fact you may recall reading how Kanchi Paramacharya sent Paul Brunton [through a vivid dream] to him for instruction. Narasimha Bharati, of Sringeri Math, has already been mentioned as whole-heartedly recommending the visits to his devotees. Sri Ramana comes under the category of 'ati-ashrami', like Dattatreya, and many others. Their lives and teachings have confirmed in every way what the Upanishads teach. For adepts at that level, personal visits are only a formality for the sake of their devotees, like Narayana Guru and many others. Kanchi Paramacharya did the Arunachala pradakshina, but did not meet Sri Ramana personally. I suppose jivanmuktas' biographies can never reveal what work they do in the non-physical dimensions! On the mundane level they seem to generate enough curiosity among the masses to draw their attention to a more sublime or divine way of life!! Regards, Sunder advaitin, "Harsha" <harsha-hkl@h...> wrote: > > I wonder how that is interpreted by the traditional scholars of Vedas who > may feel that the Sri Ramana's teachings are not in accord with the > Upanishads and Sri Shankra's teachings. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted December 17, 2001 Report Share Posted December 17, 2001 The following information from 'The Mountain Path' (Journal from Ramana Ashram) of this years Jayanthi issue may help clarify that Sri Ramana's stature was well known to Sri Siva Narasimha Bharati Swamigal, then Sankaracharya of Sringeri and if I may add, a great Yogi and Jivanmukta Himself. The Sringeri Guru Parampara, established directly by Adi Sankara, has been adorned by equally great JivanMuktas such as Vidyaranya and has helped many a seeker acheive the highest goal. As Sri Paramarthananda (yogamalika.org) says in His summary of sixth chapter, every spiritual genius in this birth is a Yoga Bhrasta (fallen Yogi) of past lives. Sri Ramana was obviously such an advanced aspirant from His previous births that knowledge dawned on Him very quickly in this birth. But He is not the only JivanMukta there will be. As Lord Krishna says while thousands may strive a few will reach Him. Even though it is a very small number there have been realized sould since Ramana's time and will continue to be. ================== Mountain Path ================================ There was a young man studying Sanskrit and sacred lore at Chidambaram. After finishing his course of studies there he went to Sringeri to hear Vedanta explained by the famous HH Narasimha Bharati Swami[1879-1912, 33rd Pontiff of Sringeri]. The Swami condescended to teach him though he had just then intended to stop teaching and retire into solitude for meditation. Once, at the end of the day's lesson, the Swami remarked, "We study scriptures and commentaries on them. They no doubt clarify one's understanding and help one spiritually; but they are only secondary.The main thing is one's spiritual ripeness. One who is already spiritually evolved need not go through the scriptures and commentaries on them. Such a one gets illuminated in a flash without these aids.The Bala Yogi of Tiruvannamalai is an instance here." The student had heard of the Brahmana Swami (Sri Bhagvan as he was then known) while at Chidambaram, but had thought it was all a hoax. And so he was stunned to hear such profound appreciation of Bhagvan from the lips of his venerable master and resolved to go and have darshan of Bhagvan before long. ================== Mountain Path ================================ regards Sundar Rajan advaitin, "sunderh" <sunderh> wrote: > Namaste, > > This excerpt from the Mountain Path journal may likely create > the wrong impression that Sri Narasimha Bharati had sent the Shastri > to Sri Ramana. This was not the case. > > The original translation, by D.S. Sharma, of Suri Nagamma's > 'Letters from Sri Ramanashram'[Vol. I & II, 1973], p. 368, has these > words: > > "Narasimha Bharathi felt very sorry for what his disciples had done, > and told them to stop all further efforts in that direction." > > 'Arunachala Mahatmya', and the verse it contained was: > > yojana-traya-maatre asmin kshetre nivasataaM nR^iNaam.h | > diikshaa aadikaM vinaa api astu mat saayujyaM mama aaj~nyaa || > > "Those who live within 24 miles of this place, i.e. this Arunachala > Hill, will get my Sayujyam, i.e. absorption into Me, freed from all > bonds, even if they do not take any Diksha. This is my order." > > Also when asked if Narasimha Bharati had visited him, Sri Ramana said > that he had greatly wished to pay a visit but people around him had > prevented this. That was the fate of Mathadhipatis! They are like > prisoners! He [Ramana] himself compared his status to a prisoner as he > had to abide by what others around him wanted him to do!! > > It should also be noted that Narasimha Bharathi had the highest regard > for Ramana, and used to refer to him as a 'baala-yogii' [the child > Master]. An incident is related [elsewhere] where one of his devotees > was pleasantly surprised to be asked whether he had paid a visit to > the 'baala-yogii', as the devotee had doubts about Ramana's stature! > > Regards, > > Sunder > > > advaitin, "Harsha" <harsha-hkl@h...> wrote: > > The Mountain Path > > Vol. 2 - OCTOBER 1965 - No. 4 > > > > Initiation Rejected > > By Nagamma > > > > 13-1-1949: > > > > > > It seems that he told the whole story to the > Shankaracharya > > Narasimha Bharati and the latter regretted the episode and told his > > followers to make no such attempts in future. > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted December 18, 2001 Report Share Posted December 18, 2001 Namaste, The answer to the question how 'brahma-jnanis' meet, is revealed in the following episode! http://kamakoti.org/souv/5-58.html "Jagadguru Sri Sankaracharya of Kanchi Kamakoti Peetham was now (end of Oct. 1947) camping near Tiruvannamalai. Someone asked whether His Holiness and Sri Bhagavan ever met. Sri Bhagavan replied: "When were we separate that we should not meet? We are always together." Actually, `togetherness' was only `oneness to that Advaita Jnani. Their unity in the sublimity of Advaita may be out of our comprehension. Both are identical in their utter simplicity born of that very sublimity. Her we can certainly understand, admire and adore the oneness of the Maha-Svami and the Maharishi and exclaim "O sancta simplicitas ! (O holy simplicity!)" Many other personal experiences with Kanchi Paramacharya [a shrotriya, brahmanishtha, sanyasi] are at URL: http://kamakoti.org/newlayout/souvenir.html Regards, Sunder advaitin, Anand Natarajan <harihara.geo> wrote: > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.