Guest guest Posted January 22, 2002 Report Share Posted January 22, 2002 Namaste, Here is an article form Rama Phaniraj, a student of Swami Dayananda Saraswati. Topics: 1.Can there be an unprejudicied observer? 2.Observer-Observed-Observation. First of all, there is no unprejudicied or unconditional observer. There can be different degrees of conditioning. So basically we should be asking two questions 1. Who is the observer and 2. Can there be observation without observer. To understand more about observer is called yoga and is very much relevent in transaction and all phenomenal relationships. Where as second question is more relevent in vedantha or Absolute freedom. Observer is a status assumed in time and space(a locus) and is born with reference to an observation. This involves a medium or a means in the form of a thought or conclusion which we call an instrument of observation. The observed is always interpreted by the observer who is conditioned by apriori knowledge accumulated through upbringing, culture, society, parents, education etc along with previous inclinations or samskaras. All the three, the observer, the observed and the observation are different modes of the mind,each depending on the other. They are born in time and so they end. There is no constancy. the observer, depending on the conditioning can be 3 types-Satvic, Rajasic or Thamasic. Kartha as detailed in Bhagavad Gita(chap 18, verses -26,27,28) Satvic observer-one who is forbearing,enthusiastic,relatively less egoistic,dispassionate, non-reacting or varying situations. Rajasic observer-is one who is passionately attached to results, aggressive,ambition,greedy, not given to purity(values) subjected to swings of elations and depressions. Thamasic observer-is one who is confused, disorganised, passionately materialistic, gross,lethargic,obstinate,procastinating and self pitying. When we say observer, is a status. He is isolated, divided, fragmentated because he is different from the observed and the instruments of observation. Therefore observer gains all reality in the context of ignorance about the true nature of observation. 2) As distinct from this is the Upanishadic mantra , which is from Kaivalopanishad, mantra 18 "Thrishu Dhamasu yad Bhogyam, Bhokta Bhoghasheha yad Bhavet Thebhyo vilakshana Sakshi ..." speaks of witness consciousness(sakshi) which is distinct from all the three-observer,observed,observation and indicates the truely unprejudicied. What distinguishes sakshi from observer is its undivided nature, unmodifying , non-changing nature and its non temporal(not subjected to time or locus, which doesnot come and go) nature, which forms the basis of all the three. Observer comes(born) into existance while witness doesnot come because it never ceases to exist. Observer depends on process of observation and observed while sakshi is untainted,whether or not observer exists. Observation is borrowed for an observer while observation is nature of witness. Observer is in time but time is witness. To come to this vision is the purpose of all scriptures. This is from highest, absolute stand point. For all transaction purpose effort is to mellow down a thamasic to rajasic to satvic observer. Then alone the other or the higher vision is possible. Send FREE video emails in Mail! http://promo./videomail/ Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.