Guest guest Posted January 25, 2002 Report Share Posted January 25, 2002 Namaskara to all, I had joined this Group about 2 months back, but I realised I had not posted my introduction till now. I am 29 years old, South Indian from Bangalore. I am interested in spirituality. I have explored various different paths like Kundalini Yoga, various forms of Kriya Yoga, Sahaj Marg, Shabd Yoga, Mantra yoga, healing etc. I have been deeply interested in the writings of Aurobindo, J.Krishnamurti, Chinmayananda, Dayananda Saraswati, Sivananda, Gurdjieff, Vivekananda and modern trans-personal psychology. However I am more drawn towards Shankara's Advaita and Ramana's Self- Enquiry. 'Vivekachoodamani', has influenced me greatly. My main aim in joining this group was to get a better grasp of Shankara's Advaita, so as to enable me to realise the fact that I am 'already Realised'. My main interest is practical. I am not so much interested in the philosophical nitty gritties. How can Advaita help my progress is my main aim. In this connection I must say that this is one of the better groups to be found on the net. The members are learned, experienced, articulate and focused. It is indeed a great opportunity for beginners like me to learn from more learned members. I am thankful for the same. Having said this , I also feel the need to make a few points on the negative side. I hope the members will pardon me if I offend anybody: 1. Before I joined the group, I thought I had got some basic grasp on the practise involved in Advaita. There was no ambiguity was what I thought. But reading the diverse for/against Nirvikalpa Samadhi; did Shankara really write the different commentaries ; Is Advaita referred to in the New Testament, Buddhism etc ; did Buddha, Christ, Ramakrishna Rumi etc. really follow Non-dualism ; is there a special interpretation of Advaita for 'advanced practitioners', all these debates have confused me. 2. There is also ambiguity about the different interpretations of scriptures. As I see it ( I may be wrong) the members are divided into the following categories : a) Those who follow Swami Chinmayananda's approach. b) THose who follow Swami Dayananda. c) Those who follow Ramana Maharshi. d) Those who advocate a synthesis of Jnana, Bhakti and Karma, i.e Purushothama Yoga. e) And finally, the unfortunate confused members like me who are attracted to many different interpretations and are yet to decide whom follow ! 3. I feel the practical aspect of sadhana, ie how to integrate every day living with spirituality is not discussed much. These are my personal views on the group. Can I expect some clarifications? amaresh. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted January 26, 2002 Report Share Posted January 26, 2002 --- amaresh <agni wrote: Namaste Amaresh, I know that the more established members of this excellent site will be able to give you more grounded advice but may I make a couple of comments: >My main aim > in > joining this group was to get a better grasp of > Shankara's Advaita, > so > as to enable me to realise the fact that I am > 'already Realised'. In order to free his hand from the jar, having grasped the nut, the monkey must let go. > all these > debates have > confused me. I think that this is why a physical teacher is useful. Confusion is excellent as it provides the opportunity to let go of claimed knowledge. 'I know' creates fixed idols and the vibrant inspiration that was seen at the moment of creation/vibration can be covered, hidden by a stone form. The Truth is there, but covered. When confusion is encountered, this can be a very tender moment when the love, mercy and compassion of a true spiritual guide can help. Otherwise, be sure that the confusion is inspired by Ishvara/Absolute and is the natural process of being drawn into Self and out of what you are not. Self is never confused. > > 2. There is also ambiguity about the different > interpretations of > scriptures. Ambiguity/paradox is necessary for the intellect to transcend ignorance; it is the process by which sattva arises out of the opposite of tamas and rajas. > e) And finally, the unfortunate confused members > like me who are > attracted > to many different interpretations and are yet > to decide whom > follow ! Again, welcome to the club that most of us enjoy. How often have I heard this said and repeated it myself. But there is no problem here. When the bell rings in the heart..by this I mean that intellectual and true emotional, unmoving centre...follow. Remember that in order to use the lamp that is so dim that it can only show one step at a time, then it is necessary to take that first step to see the next....Padam Padam. > > 3. I feel the practical aspect of sadhana, ie how to > integrate > every day living with spirituality is not > discussed much. The thread on the usefulness of advaita will have given you some direction on this. > > These are my personal views on the group. Can I > expect some > clarifications? I do not know if the above is of any use . Finally:When I first arrived in Bangalore on the overnight bus it was about 5am and very dark. There were many bus stops at which to get down and in the darkness I was very confused by such a big city and got down in the outskirts. I wanted to find a friend who lived in Benson Town. Wherever there was a light at a tea house or stall I would seek help. Wrong directions and decisions were taken at times but by the time the sun was climbing the heavens I was at my friend's house. Even though I had telephoned my friend I still needed help from those whom I met on the way. The knowledge I had been given had to be put into practice by myself, no-one could do it for me. Now it is easy for me to find my way to Benson Town but there are many other places in which to get lost. Om sri ram Ken Knight Great stuff seeking new owners in Auctions! http://auctions. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted January 26, 2002 Report Share Posted January 26, 2002 Ken Your advise to Shree amaresh applies to all of us. Thanks for taking time to share your experience. One cannot learn swimming by reading books and listening to the discussion of mechanics of swimming. One has to jump into the pool and make effort to move. There is no other way. It is a struggle in the beginning. But the knack of swimming comes only to those who strive for. Guiding light from a teacher will help - even to see that light one has to make steps to start. Hari OM! Sadananda >ken knight <hilken_98 >advaitin >advaitin >Re: Introduction >Sat, 26 Jan 2002 02:04:06 -0800 (PST) > > >--- amaresh <agni wrote: >Namaste Amaresh, > >The knowledge I had been given had to be put into >practice by myself, no-one could do it for me. Now it >is easy for me to find my way to Benson Town but there >are many other places in which to get lost. > >Om sri ram >Ken Knight _______________ Chat with friends online, try MSN Messenger: http://messenger.msn.com Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted January 27, 2002 Report Share Posted January 27, 2002 --- amaresh <agni wrote: > I would like to meet > you when u visit Bangalore next. Namaste Amaresh, That would be very nice and I thank you. I should be in Bangalore now, visiting the campus of the National Institute of Advanced Studies where there is a very interesting young lady working in the field of consciousness studies. We have yet to meet but exchange e-mails. However prarabhda has other plans at the moment. Once the way is clear again I will be able to commence the project that will bring the body to Bangalore later this year, I hope. Besides the NIAC contact I also want to go to Madanapalli where another friend has set up a school for the very poor children of the area. The obstacles arise then are taken away; it is all an interesting play. The image of the monkey-hand grasping and letting go is so important for us. There comes that wonderful moment of understanding, immediately ahankara claims the knowledge, 'I know.' Now there is the obstacle in place. We can either clamber over it, round it or dig under it or 'let go'; in the latter case we will see that the obstacle was a delusion, it never was, just a production of mind. Renunciation is indeed essential, renouncing renunciation is essential, giving up not renouncing is necessary. For the mind it is a never-ending process. Finally the pot cracks, breaks into pieces and returns to its constituent elements and the space outside the pot, within the pot and within the molecular structure of the pot remains, as it always was and is and will be, undivided and undisturbed. That is the teaching of advaita as I understand it and all the various teachers that you mentioned in your previous posting signal this Truth. However their teachings have to be culture specific and at the level of the 'pot' it helps to have experience of the culture to be able to scratch away the surfaces. We can only start from where we are and as I implied before, the flow of grace of the Friend will ensure that we are in the right place at the right time and Guru can appear in many forms to shine that lamp the one step we need to take. Once again, thank you for offering to meet up in Bangalore when we will be able to share in some good conversation. Peace and Happiness Ken Knight Great stuff seeking new owners in Auctions! http://auctions. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted January 27, 2002 Report Share Posted January 27, 2002 Dear Ken Knight, Thanks for the clarifications,they were useful. I would like to meet you when u visit Bangalore next. amaresh. ken knight wrote: > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.