Guest guest Posted April 20, 2002 Report Share Posted April 20, 2002 HI friend:About the free will and determinism I find this quote from Benjamin Libet:"Freely voluntary acts are preceded by a specific electrical change in the brain (the 'readiness potential', RP) that begins 550 ms before the act. Human subjects became aware of intention to act 350-400 ms after RP starts, but 200 ms. before the motor act. The volitional process is therefore initiated unconsciously. The conscious function could't control the outcome; it can't veto the act. Free will is therefore excluded. These findings put constraints on our views of the free will versus determinism dilema. The findings also affect views of guilt and responsibility. But the deeper question still remains: Who's will.The advaita answer "God" will".The "science" answer "genes and conditioning by society".There's a semantic problem here,why no simple action happening through "apparent body/minds organisms" with no entities involved?Only "apparent acts" like in a dream?.Who have the free will in a dream drama?Who is the one determined by who'm? That the true question,and there is "nobody"to answer it.The seeking [of the true answer]is going all the time but there is no seeker.The "who" is merely an imagined concept that is happenig.There is no who and there is no what to be sought.Do "you" still want to solve the dilema of free will versus determinism?"Relax" no way for a "you".Regards, atagrasin Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted April 21, 2002 Report Share Posted April 21, 2002 Shree atagrasin - as a scientist I question the conclusions from the observations. The studies does not establish the sufficiency condition. For that if one initiates 550 ms RP potential and one is led to act on that basis of the potential differnece then it establishes the sufficiency condition and the conclusions are correct. Otherwise it is by products of the action only and not basis to make valid conclusions. Of course from Vedanata point free will exist or not depends on the reference state - From the point of Brahman - or state zero- there is no free will - since Brahma is beyond all that. From state 1, or reference state of vyavahaara - the free will is with in the realm of cause and effect. There is purushaartha and there is prarabda. all valid with in that reference. The RP potentials are within the realm of vyavahaara. Hari Om! Sadananda --- atagrasin <k1c2 wrote: > HI friend:About the free will and determinism I find > this quote from > Benjamin Libet Relax" no way for > a "you".Regards, atagrasin Games - play chess, backgammon, pool and more http://games./ Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted April 21, 2002 Report Share Posted April 21, 2002 advaitin, kuntimaddi sadananda <kuntimaddisada> wrote: > > Shree atagrasin - as a scientist I question the > conclusions from the observations. The studies does > not establish the sufficiency condition. For that if > one initiates 550 ms RP potential and one is led to > act on that basis of the potential differnece then it > establishes the sufficiency condition and the > conclusions are correct. Otherwise it is by products > of the action only and not basis to make valid > conclusions. > > Of course from Vedanata point free will exist or not > depends on the reference state - From the point of > Brahman - or state zero- there is no free will - since > Brahma is beyond all that. From state 1, or reference > state of vyavahaara - the free will is with in the > realm of cause and effect. There is purushaartha and > there is prarabda. all valid with in that reference. > The RP potentials are within the realm of vyavahaara. HI MR Sadananda:Free will in any reference state is only an illusion."You" think you have choice but how much choice you have?The whole point is ,you say you chose path A or path B.What do you really do when you chose A or B?What happen when you say,"I'm going to go along path B?IT is really a thought which comes to you,isn't it?The whole process is a thought come ,get vocalized,and then actualized in action.But YOU CAN NOT WILL A THOUGHT>.If you can't will a thought how can you pretend to have free will?IT seem you don't understand Mr libet experiments:He has show that before an action occurs,there is a spike in the electrocardiogram record a signal.This signal indicates when a decision was made.According to Libet findings the signal occurs about HALF-SECOND before the become concious of that decision,but the person think that it was his or her decision while in facts it was already made before he or she became aware of the decision.So LIBET finding s underscore what True advaita is saying all along:WE ARE NOT THE DOERS OF OUR DEEDS OR THINKER OF OUR THOUGHT.You wrote you question this findings but the understanding of this is not in your hands,the understanding happen or not happen.You wrote "the free will is with in the realm of cause and effect"This is a contradiction, do you know the Bell's theorem?There is not local causes.Advaita means NON-DUAL.Cause and effect is only a concept of the mind to try to explain the inexplainable.There is a good book "The ashtavakra Gita" that can help to dispell the "free will" and the "cause and effect" myth. Regards atagrasin Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.