Article sent from The Hindu

[Guest guest]

=============================================================

This article has been sent to you by Ram Chandran ( rchandran )

=============================================================

Source: thThe Hindu

(http://www.hinduonnet.com/2002/07/26/stories/2002072600200800.htm)

 

Miscellaneous

-

Religion

  

 

Man reaps the result of his actions

 

 

 

 

CHENNAI

JULY 26

 

.. There is an element of unpredictability in human life. When everything works

to one's advantage a person feels he is lucky whereas when he faces problems and

setbacks he curses his bad luck. This has been the layperson's view over

generations. One with a philosophical outlook will say that it is fate, which is

responsible for man's lot in life. The layperson's attitude is to put the onus

on God by considering himself as an instrument in His hands, which amounts to

saying that He predetermines everything. This view is called fatalism.

Scriptures reject fatalism outright but accept fate. So, it is necessary to

understand the difference between fate and fatalism.

 

Destiny (fate) according to scriptures is the result of the Karma done in

earlier lives. What one enjoys in this life is what one reaps as a consequence

of previous actions. Assuming that God wills everything in human lives and that

they are only puppets in His hands, then no responsibility vests with the

individual for his actions. This is the corollary of fatalism. According to the

scriptures human beings have freewill to act but has to enjoy the result of

their actions, which is destiny. Moreover, there are intrinsic flaws in the

theory of fatalism. It makes God the doer and not man. The analogy of a car

(man) and driver (God) helps to understand this. In an accident it is only the

driver who is penalised and not the car. If fatalism is true then God becomes

the perpetrator of all the atrocities committed by all, as humans are only

instruments. Not only is this preposterous, but it follows that if God is the

doer then He must be the enjoyer also. Then what a tragedy it sh!

ould become at the cosmic level if it is true. On the contrary it is man who is

in bondage.

 

Further, such a view makes God unkind and whimsical because He gives joy to some

and sorrow to others in an arbitrary manner. The Almighty, on the other hand, is

an ocean of compassion and impartial. If fatalism is true then the scriptures

will become redundant because man is not the doer and hence has no need for

ethics. This view also has no room for freewill because it posits that man does

not have a choice, as everything is predetermined.

 

In her discourse, Swamini Satyavratananda said the very fact that human beings

had conflicts in life showed that man was endowed with freewill to exercise his

choice. Those who profess fatalism are escapists in that they absolve themselves

of the repercussions of their actions as they consider God as the one who

directs them.

 

 

 

 

 

 

Copyright: 1995 - 2002 The Hindu

 

Republication or redissemination of the contents of this screen are expressly

prohibited without the consent of The Hindu