Guest guest Posted August 10, 2002 Report Share Posted August 10, 2002 First my apologies - too busy with trivial things - and for entering little little late on discussion of the issues raised related to the very important upanishad. 1. Dating of this upanishad. - every one agrees that it is before B.geeta. Mahabhaarat period is at least 3000BC that is 5000 years old. I translated an article that discussed the exact date of Mahabhaarat based on astrological information available in Mahabharata itself. (some time in 1999-2000 period in this list). One can tap the article from archives. 2. The naka nikRitanam - or nail cutter that is being referred to in the Upanishad is made of wroght Iron - since it also says Krishnaayasam - or Black iron. They did not know Stainless steel at that time - that is more modern developement. The iron age started much before the Mahabhaarata times. The extraction and making of Brass was also known in India. Dr. Anantaraman ( he was my professor and is a greate vedantin too - related to shree Ram Chandran), has written two books - one on metallurgical practices in anciet India and the next on the mystery of Delhi Iron Piller. He gives a better account of the history of Iron making in India. 3. Vaachaarambhanam vikaaro naamadheyam - As shree Nair mentioned this is very important part of the mantra. vaaka aarambhanam - sounds like 'in the beginning was the word- the word was with the god'. Before creation of any thing start - as pot from clay or ornament from gold etc - involves word - word implies thought - a)the creater has to have a concept of what he is going to create first - that is it shoud involve a well thoughtout process. b) vikaaro involes a modification. Creation is not something out of nothing but something out of something - a modification - also something cannot come out from nothing. c) If something has to comeout from what was there before - as the three examples illustrates - what was there before - earlier mantra-s already established that - sat eva somya idam agra asiit ... and tad aithshata - Existence alone was there in the beginning and that existence was of the nature of chit - since it says it saw. and it is unlimited - ekam eva advitiiyam - one without a second. unlimited is free from limitations and hence free from sorrow - absolute happiness. What was there was - sat chit and ananda and it bacame many - just as one becoming many. d) one plus many is still one becuase the becoming many is like clay becoming many pots - or gold becoming many ornaments - In this vikaara - or modification - the cause pervades the effects as the threee examples illustrates. e) The three examples also illustrates that the cause is also the material cause like clay to the pot or metal to the ornament f) the mantras also indicates by saying that vaachaarambhanam - the cause is also the intellegent cause or nimitta kaaraNa. That cause involves both material and intelligent causes together as one. That is the significance of repeating each time vaachaarambhanam vikaarao naama dheyam. This is again consisting of taittiriiya U. statement - yatova imaani bhuutani jaayante, yena jaatani jiivanti - From which the whole world arose and by which it is sutained. Material cause alone can sustain the creation as clay sustains the pot. without clay, pot has no independent existence. g) Also the illustrations tell us one can know the cause by examining the effect. - knowing the cause from the effects. h) the illustrations also demonstates the inherent laws of causation - 1. every effect must have a cause 2. effects are nothing but cause itself in different form (vikaara- with names) 3. If cause is removed the effects also vanish - that is effects have no independent existence - this will have bearing also in the further teaching when we come to tat tvam asi - section. since that - tat part is being referred to as the very cause - the cause-effect relations ship is the running theme of this chapter. vaaachaarambhanam - also signifies most impartent thing - does the world really exists separate from vaak or thought - this is very fundamental to adviata. That object is out there is nothing but thought in the mind and thought in the mind is nothing but disturbance of consciousness and thus nothing but consciousness itself - the seer and seen distinction is only apparent - as the very mantra-s start - It saw - it cannot can not see anything since there is nothing other than itself - hence the upanishad starts with the apparent duality and confirms with these three mantras - one plus many plurality is like one clay plus many pots - it is apparent plurality - naama and ruupa and in essence it is one only - that cause that exists as the essence of the effect. Since the cause is chaitanya - the effect cannot be jadam if it is existing in and through - All that means apparent jadam is not real but only perturbation in the consciousness. and that is what the implied meaning of vaachaarambhanam vikaaro naama dheyam mantra. Hari OM! Sadananda ===== What you have is His gift to you and what you do with what you have is your gift to Him - Swami Chinmayananda. HotJobs - Search Thousands of New Jobs http://www.hotjobs.com Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted August 10, 2002 Report Share Posted August 10, 2002 Sorry when I read my own post - found so many silly mistakes. I hope the meaning makes still some sense. Hari OM! Sadananda ===== What you have is His gift to you and what you do with what you have is your gift to Him - Swami Chinmayananda. HotJobs - Search Thousands of New Jobs http://www.hotjobs.com Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.