Jump to content
IndiaDivine.org

Doership v/s Karma

Rate this topic


Guest guest

Recommended Posts

A basic question. Krishna tells Arjuna that he ought

not to have the "sense of doership": that Arjuna should

submit to the higher power and recognize that he is being

controlled by the higher power.

 

So how does Karma play a role in this context? If I am

to surrender to the "higher power" and give up my sense

of doership, should I not work out my past karma by

ownership of my past/current action?

 

Excuse me if I am not clear in my questions as I am confused!

 

regards,

 

Niranjan

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Namaste Niranjan.

 

My understanding:

 

Your past karma will work out on its own without your having any

ownership over it. Your karma after surrender to the Lord will be

unbinding, done with prasAdabuddhi, as an offering to the Lord, i.e.

you will continue to perform actions to achieve legitimate ends in an

attitude of worship; however, whatever the result of such actions

(exactly what you wanted, more, less or just the opposite), you will

accept them with eqanimity, without complaints, as prasAda coming

from the Lord.

 

Regards.

 

Madathil Nair

_______________

 

 

A-- In advaitin, Niranjan Konduri <niranjan@u...> wrote:

> So how does Karma play a role in this context? If I am

> to surrender to the "higher power" and give up my sense

> of doership, should I not work out my past karma by

> ownership of my past/current action?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Niranjanji

 

Let me try a quick and short reply to your question on Doership.

It is not only the doership that is to be negated but also the

'experiencership' (bhoktA = experiencer, bhoktRtvaM

=experiencership) that is to be negated. When both are negated

your question does nolt arise.

 

praNAms to all advaitins

 

profvk

 

 

=====

Prof. V. Krishnamurthy

My website on Science and Spirituality is http://www.geocities.com/profvk/

You can access my book on Gems from the Ocean of Hindu Thought Vision and

Practice, and my father R. Visvanatha Sastri's manuscripts from the site.

 

 

 

Finance - Get real-time stock quotes

http://finance.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

advaitin, Niranjan Konduri <niranjan@u...> wrote:

>

> A basic question. Krishna tells Arjuna that he ought

> not to have the "sense of doership": that Arjuna should

> submit to the higher power and recognize that he is being

> controlled by the higher power.

>

> So how does Karma play a role in this context? If I am

> to surrender to the "higher power" and give up my sense

> of doership, should I not work out my past karma by

> ownership of my past/current action?

 

 

Namaste,

 

One of the strategies to extract answers to questions like yours

is to see if the answer is 'embedded' in the Gita itself. Choose the

verse(s) that comes closest to your understanding as an answer. Learn

it by heart, chant it as often as you can, tnink about it as deeply

as you can, listen to the audio recording. It will lead you to other

verses that will deepen your understanding. Not enough has been

emphasised of the potency of the 'mantras' embedded in the Gita. Even

if you fail to get an intellectual grasp, your conduct will begin to

show the effect.

 

Just as examples: Gita 11:33 , 18:46

 

tasmaattvamuttishhTha yasho labhasva

jitvaa shatruun.h bhuN^.hkshva raajya.n samR^iddham.h .

mayaivaite nihataaH puurvameva

nimittamaatraM bhava savyasaachin.h .. 11\.33..

 

or

 

yataH pravR^ittirbhuutaanaa.n yena sarvamidaM tatam.h .

svakarmaNaa tamabhyarchya siddhi.n vindati maanavaH .. 18\.46..

 

It is easy to imagine that an intellectual understanding will

necessarily change one's perspective to a spiritual one; but it will

still need effort to put it into practice.

 

 

Regards,

 

Sunder

Link to comment
Share on other sites

> advaitin, Niranjan Konduri <niranjan@u...> wrote:

> >

> > A basic question. Krishna tells Arjuna that he ought

> > not to have the "sense of doership": that Arjuna should

> > submit to the higher power and recognize that he is being

> > controlled by the higher power.

> >

> > So how does Karma play a role in this context? If I am

> > to surrender to the "higher power" and give up my sense

> > of doership, should I not work out my past karma by

> > ownership of my past/current action?

 

Shree Niranjan, can you see contradition in your question - please

examine it again. Giving up the doership means that I am never a

doer but the doing is being done by Prakriti by the power of the Lord

- PrakRiti eva ca karmaani kriyamaanaani sarvashhaH| - all actions

are being done by prakRiti alone. That is clear understanding of the

actual state of affiars that Krishna wants to Arjuna to recognize the

facts. Giving up the sense of doership is like my giving up the

presidentship of the United states or million dollars in the

neighbourhood bank. How much of effort is involved in giving up that

which I never owned to start with! The sense of doership is not

actual or factual but only a notional and If that is factual - Giita

or no Giita - there is no way one can give up. Now you see the

fallasy of your next question that follows - you ask - if I give up

my sense of doership ...should I not work out my past karma!- Where

is then the question of working out past or present or future

karma-s? When I was never a doer to start with where is the question

of giving up - Is not something like giving up my million dollars

that never owned to start with. akrathaahma abhooktaaham aham eva

aham avyayaH - I am never a doer nor an enjoyer I am that

inexhaustible existence-consciousnes-bliss. The dropping notions can

occur only when the truth of myself is recognized - till then it is

only 'idea' of giving up. It is like we do aarati every day - tana

mana dhana sabkuch teraahai ... the body, mind and all the wealth is

all yours - and then we repeat the same thing next day again. Once

it is surrendered to the Lord there is no question of again

surrendering it - How can one surrender twice - unless the first time

we did not surrender but only threated to surrender - We cannot give

the same thing as gift twice to the same person.

 

Giving up the notions occurs with clear understanding of the truth.

Till then - the performe action to the best you can but offer that as

prayer to the Lord That is naivadyam or kainkaryam- The result of the

action comes from the Lord and whatever that comes from the Lord is

prasaad as Shree Nairji has discussed. That makes the mind

non-reactive and it is only the mind that is non-reactive that is

capable of learning from its mistakes - the greatest mistake is

assuming doership when it is not there to start with!

 

Hari OM!

Sadananda

 

 

 

 

 

=====

What you have is His gift to you and what you do with what you have is your gift

to Him - Swami Chinmayananda.

 

 

 

Finance - Get real-time stock quotes

http://finance.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
×
  • Create New...