Guest guest Posted September 21, 2002 Report Share Posted September 21, 2002 My dear noble devotee of Sri Sankara Bhagavatpujyapada, Than you very much for your kind reply,sir. We can't afford to end that mAnasa! Our most beautiful swan is there. Please look at the swan. The mAnasa is not seen any more. Bhuvaneswarji doesn't exist. Only She exists – the one who shines like a million Suns. And, lo! When Bhuvaneswar does not exist,there is no manasa ,sir.Sarvam khalvidam Brahma!!! Right now, I am because I think I am and since I think I am, I am doing research on proverbs because of the vasana. Unless ,I finish off with that vasana, I cannot simply look like a spectator. I fully ageee with your suggestion to simply look.SIMPLY...SIMPLY looking is matter of I ...LOOKING without I.That is destroying the I thought in one way or the other. I understand that nahi nahi rakshati dhukrunkarane but I cannot just jump off.Let the fruit ripen and fall off without bleeding. Thank you for your love. Please send me some quotations on vak related to the scriptures.I am scripture illiterate. I sent the holy pictures of Sri Chakram,Sri Saradamba, Sri Dakshinaa Murty and Sri Ganesa in the reverse order.But they are blocked by your rules. Any way to accommmodate my request ? Aha regarding the metaphor,I thought of it after typing and sending the letter. May be that is how Sri Saradamba wanted it . I am in the nebulous sky of samsara at this moment and I want to land on to the stable Brahmavastha.I am sorry, I reversed the traditional thinking aboutit. Please forgive me. I have no intention of distorting Sri Krishna's banyan tree example. Yours In Sri Sankara Bhagavatpujyapada's love, Chilukuri Bhuvaneswar --- Madathil Rajendran Nair <madathilnair wrote: <HR> <html><body> <tt> My dear Bhuvaneswarji.<BR> <BR> Reference your post 14734.<BR> <BR> I will try to be as short as possible. But when it comes to Vedanta, <BR> I am noisy and talkative. Can't help it.<BR> <BR> I believe you meant the pramanAs by sAstrik knowledge. Pramanas are <BR> the landmarks. They are like light houses. We need them to do <BR> vichAra without getting lost. I have made this clear in my previous <BR> two posts.<BR> <BR> Your understanding of my metaphor of people who drift like golden <BR> clouds in an azure sky is cent percent right. I employed that <BR> metaphor to drive home the point that such people exist, that we <BR> could be like them in this very birth if only we did proper vichAra <BR> on our true nature according to pramAnas, and that meditation <BR> opportunities could be utilized to do this vichAra instead of using <BR> them to tirelessly prod at the unknown. Such constant vichAra <BR> ultimately delivers even without the need of samAdhi stopovers! One <BR> who does not do vichAra can have a samAdhi "experience". But once he <BR> comes out of samAdhi, he goes back to his old ways of ignorance.<BR> <BR> Thank you for quoting from our Mother Lalita's nAmAvali. Please <BR> consider the last name of your quote – bhaktamAnasa hamsika: the <BR> swan of the mAnasa (lake) of the devotee. The swan is where? In the <BR> mAnasa. So, we are still at mAnasa level. We can't afford to end <BR> that mAnasa! Our most beautiful swan is there. Please look at the <BR> swan. The mAnasa is not seen any more. Bhuvaneswarji doesn't exist. <BR> Only She exists – the one who shines like a million Suns. And, lo! <BR> All of a sudden the realization dawns – "I am looking at myself". I <BR> hope you got the point. Please try to see that hamsika all the time –<BR> at the bus stop, at the market place, in your classroom, when you <BR> look at the eyes of your students (You are a teacher, I remember! How <BR> wonderful!). She will take care of you and answer your doubts. <BR> Isn't She avidyAnam antastimiradweepanagari? (Saundarya Lahari).<BR> <BR> Now about thoughts bothering you. Why should they bother you? Do <BR> the stars bother you? No. Why? Because they are out there and they <BR> are not yours. Thoughts bother you because you feel that they <BR> are "your" thoughts, they concern you and they are inside you. <BR> Please sit and look at them like you look at the stars. You can see <BR> them come, twinkle in your mental space and go. It is like sitting at <BR> Chicago airport and watching the planes land one after another. <BR> Simply look at them. It may be the wife thought. Salute her and let <BR> her pass. Wives are most demanding. Don't go after that thought. <BR> It may be money thought which has a very great pull. Salute and <BR> leave it to pass. Mind you, Bhuvaneswarji, this watching is great <BR> fun. It is like JohnL of our list watching the grass grow. Who is <BR> the watcher – you Bhuvaneswarji. You are the big light from which <BR> those little thoughts borrowed their light. And you are worried <BR> about them?! The Sun worrying about the candles! So, don't ever <BR> think of destroying your thoughts or your mind, which is nothing but <BR> a flow of thoughts. Have them, treasure them, watch them and be <BR> yourself inspite of them. Then they go away because they are <BR> intelligent enough to understand that you don't care to entertain <BR> them. With them, your desire to get at the root of your thoughts <BR> will also vanish because you already know that the "root" is you – <BR> the brilliant hamsika! The root of not the thoughts alone but the <BR> whole universe that you experience!<BR> <BR> No one can escape thinking like no one can escape breathing (na <BR> kaschit ksanamapi …… (BG)). But don't think that I am thinking and I <BR> am breathing. Be the witness of both which you actually are. That <BR> witness dictates your thoughts but does not think. The thinker who <BR> has the thinkership thinks that he thinks and then grieves! That is <BR> not you. You are the witness.<BR> <BR> May I reverse metaphor at the end of your post? SamsAra is down <BR> below. BrahmAvasta is the sky. You need the rocket and fuel of <BR> proper knowledge (pramAnAs)and vichAra on them to send you up there <BR> and place you in permanent orbit!<BR> <BR> Now, please join me in singing the thousand names of our Hamsika, Sri <BR> Lalita Parameswari.<BR> <BR> Pranams.<BR> <BR> Madathil Nair<BR> <BR> advaitin, Bhuvaneswar Chilukuri <bhuvaneswarc> wrote:<BR> <BR> <BR> </tt> <br> <!-- |**|begin egp html banner|**| --> <table border=0 cellspacing=0 cellpadding=2> <tr bgcolor=#FFFFCC> <td align=center><font size="-1" color=#003399><b> Sponsor</b></font></td> </tr> <tr bgcolor=#FFFFFF> <td align=center width=470><table border=0 cellpadding=0 cellspacing=0> <tr> <td align=center><font face=arial size=-2></font><br><a href="http://rd./M=234081.2377872.3808768.1261774/D=egroupweb/S=1705075\ 991:HM/A=1225247/R=0/*of Service</a>.</tt> </br> </body></html> ______________________ Missed your favourite TV serial last night? Try the new, TV. visit http://in.tv.''>http://in.tv.'>http://in.tv. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted September 21, 2002 Report Share Posted September 21, 2002 Dear Prof. Krishnamurthyji and Ramji, Thanks once again for your kind words of appreciation. Prof. Murthyji, as asked by Ramji, I am addressing this to the List and not to you directly. Hope this change of decision will not matter. This morning, I remembered that I had sent a detailed introduction and profile when I joined the list and looked it up in the archives. My post is there in the welcome message # 12139. Will you kindly refer to it? I don't want to waste diskspace by quoting it here all over again. However, I would like to elaborate on the contents as follows to answer Prof. Murthyji's specific queries: You can describe my path as jnAna mArga. As jnAna is understanding that I am everything and, since I love only myself unconditionally, I know that I cannot claim full jnAna until I am spontaneously in love with all creation. That love is true devotion. So, I understand JnAna and bhakti are inter-complementary. My ishtadevata is the Universal Mother and my ongoing endeavour is to see Her in everything and love Her as myself. I am sure I will succeed. With her around, who will not? I would say I have three gurus: 1. Swami Dayananda Saraswathiji. As I mentioned in my introduction, he pushed me irreversibly into the contemplation mode. I have not seen him for a long time now. He may not remember me even! However, his message "Contemplate!" still keeps ringing as well as working. A raining cloud does not bother whether it watered a particular thirsty tree enroute. It has the whole world in view! I never had an opportunity to meet Swami Chinmayanandaji although I grew up reading his works. 2. Mata Amritanandamayi Devi in whom I have found a living personification of the jnAna I described above. She is in love with the entire creation. She has convinced me that others could also be like her if they tried. 3. The most indefatigable despot of our times who is currently keeping the most powerful man on earth amusingly pre-occupied. Yes. Saddam Hussein - for keeping me incarcerated in Baghdad in 1990, for teaching me that the things that we run after can all end in a split second, that a man can face any hardships and, since he can, he may as well do that without wailing like an idiot. His prison camp was my contemplation laboratory. Ramji, you really scare me when you call me a scholar. I am nothing of that sort. I haven't even studied the BG adequately. I am sending posts on it and on Ch. Up. just to keep the discussion going, learn more and engage in effective satsang. I am a very lazy guy with innumerable failings and foibles. I am afraid my kArana sarIra post sent the wrong message and our Sadanandaji suspected I was perhaps advocating the so-called Direct Approach. I have just begun to read Klein. Honestly, I find him profound in several respects. There is a lot to be learnt from him. However, I can never to the opinion that "knowledge" can be attained by simple talk. One has to do strict sAdhana and vichAra on scriptural statements. I wanted to emphasize this point at the end of my last post (the one in the form a conversation between A and B). However, in the hurry of rushing my daughter to the dentist, the matter skipped my attention. I am not that good at the sAdhana part - particularly physical. Although I do regular sIrSAsana (headstand), sarvAngAsana (shoulderstand), sUrya namaskAr (saltuation to Sun God) and several other difficult bending yoga poses, will you believe I cannot still sit in padmAsana (lotus pose)? Even sukhAsana (the easy meditation pose) is difficult for me. It has got something to do with anatomy. I have no choice but to accept it. Such a me was once in the company of a yogic "practitioner" (Courtesy for the word: our Gummuluru Murthyji again) - a master of yogAsanAs and a Sree Vidya UpAsaka strictly as per vidhis (scriptural instructions). I was driving and he was sitting beside me when I narrated the happiness and ecstasy I experience in the incessant chanting of the Lalita SahasranAmAvali (the thousand names of Mother Lalita). He looked really concerned and asked me if I did the chanting while driving too. When I answered in the affirmative, he advised me against doing that. He was worried about the possibility of my sliding into a samAdhi while driving - the prospect of a big accident, my death, my family being without support etc. I could appreciate his concern. However, I could'nt avoid wondering why such an accomplished spiritual person entertained such mortal worries. I believe the answer to that lies in the firmness of one's advaitic convictions. An advaitin should realize that what happens or what thought occurs in the next moment is not within his hands or control. Lalita takes care of it. Leave it to Her. She knows when I should have my samAdhi. It is Her will. Teachers like Saddam Hussein are instrumental in imparting such convictions to us! That was what he taught many of us on the morning of 2nd August 1990. Some learnt the lesson. Others are yet to. Ignorance runs very deep indeed! I am a reckless Don Quixote fighting imaginary windmills on the outskirts of vedanta. There is my Mother to attend to my bruises when I return home tired. My friend is a study in contrast. He follows the rules, keeps his calm and entertains legitimate worries. Mother loves him too. Does She not love her voracious elephant son and his studious brother equally? What more do we need, Sirs? MAta cha PArvateedevi, pitA devo maheswarah BAndhavA sivabhaktahcha, swadeso bhuvanathrayam! (My mother is PArvati Devi, father Lord Siva; devotees of Lord Siva are my friends and relatives, and my place all three worlds (waking, dream and sleep). I was born in Mumbai (SivAji Park), grew up in Kerala and belongs to bhuvanathrayam. Thanks for asking me to write. If I have indulged, as I always do, kindly forgive this son of a Great Mother! I chant the Saundarya Lahari verse "avidyAnAm antastimiradweepanagari......" three times before beginning to write. So, I don't have any claims to what I write. If you find clarity in it, Prof. Murthyji, that clarity belongs to Her! PranAms to all advaitins. Madathil Nair ______________________ advaitin, "V. Krishnamurthy" <profvk> wrote: > Namaste. Madathilnairji, Your plea for spontaneity and > naturalness in the effort at spirituality is marvellous. > Personally I would like to know more about your background and > the path you trod to arrive at such clarity. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted September 21, 2002 Report Share Posted September 21, 2002 Madathil Nairji wrote: (Post #14738) ......Now about thoughts bothering you. Why should they bother you? Do the stars bother you? No. Why? Because they are out there and they are not yours. Thoughts bother you because you feel that they are "your" thoughts, they concern you and they are inside you. Please sit and look at them like you look at the stars. You can see them come, twinkle in your mental space and go. It is like sitting at Chicago airport and watching the planes land one after another. Simply look at them..... ------------------------------- VK: I am reminded of a characteristic expression of The Mother (Aurobindo Ashram): Don't you see, through the window, sitting in your room in your house, things happening on the street, and people going this way and that way, and sometimes quarrelling too? Don't you just see them without being affected or impacted? That is the posture you have to keep watching your own thoughts. Thoughts come and go. Just watch them. Don't get into the subject of the thoughts. Don't get involved in the thoughts. One thought will come but it will go. Soon another thought will arise. Just as one person walking in the street appears in your window-view but soon disappears and another person appears. As each thought arises and falls, let it do so. Sometimes the next thought will take some time to arise. Don't expect the thought. Don't think about the absence of the next thought. Don't think about anything. And so on she goes describing what happens when you meditate! praNAms to all advaitins. profvk ===== Prof. V. Krishnamurthy My website on Science and Spirituality is http://www.geocities.com/profvk/ You can access my book on Gems from the Ocean of Hindu Thought Vision and Practice, and my father R. Visvanatha Sastri's manuscripts from the site. Finance - Get real-time stock quotes http://finance. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted September 24, 2002 Report Share Posted September 24, 2002 My dear Bhuvaneswarji, It was virtually pouring cats and dogs last week on the Advaitin List. I had missed your post # 14741 in the deluge. I read it only this morning. There is a dry spell now! Kindly permit me to point out the following that I gathered from our exchange of frequent mails: 1. One has to decide whether research is for advaita or advaita for research. In your case, I am afraid, the latter applies. 2. That is perhaps why you feel that you are doing research because of vAsana. No doubt, all actions can be tracked back to vAsanas. But such reasoning out shall not be a justification for continuing inadvaitic actions. 3. Advaita becomes practical when it quells the spell of vAsanAs. Indulging on the vAsana link only reinforces ignorance and doershp. 4. You can remain an advaitin and continue research. Such research without a feeling of "researchership" is most enjoyable and most effective because then you become the research itself and not the researcher. This applies to each and every action that we perform. Be the action and find the thrill! 5. This was what I meant when I said in my previous post "Bhuvaneswarji does not exist" when he sees the brilliant hamsika. However, you used that statement to point out to me that if you didn't exist, there was no mAnasa either, implying that the experience was at a level beyond the mAnasa. 6. You are quite right. However, I am afraid you missed the point I was trying to make. Just imagine, you are enjoying your early morning tea. You are relishing every drop of it because that is the first cup of tea after a long period of deprivation. The world is very much around you, your eyes and ears are open, but where are you? Right in the taste buds! You are very much in the enjoyment of the tea, nay, you are the very enjoyment. At that moment, there is no moment, there is no Bhuvaneswarji, there are no taste-buds, there is no tea and there is no mind. Everything merged into one - enjoyment. It is only afterwards that all the components and paraphernalia that merged into the making of that enjoyment fall apart to present you with an "experience of enjoyment" where you are there with your enjoyership with a sense of past, present and future. Even the knowledge that the experience was enjoyed because there was a mind behind it occurs only later and, mind you, it occurs to the "enjoyer with an enjoyership". [in fact, as an aside, this is the explanation that I would like to apply for our deep sleep experience too!] It is upto you to be such "enjoyment" each and every moment of your research work and life too. Life can then become just an "explosion of enjoyment" which can make you fall on the ground and roll! (I have a better single word. I am afraid of using it lest I am misunderstood.). Advaita helps. But on one condition, research for advaita not vice versa. It is upto you to make up your mind. Please don't think this Nair fellow is advising too much. I am just observing for the sake of satsang. Don't ever think I am a stotriya. I am also scripture-illiterate and currently operating without even a copy of the beloved BG! Thanks for the kind gesture of sending me the pictures. Yes. This List does not permit attachments. And that reminds me - here is an "advice" afterall. I see that you are quoting the whole of reference posts and that too with details of the formatting! I don't know why formatting details appear in your quotes! It does not happen to us. In order to save your and the List's diskspace, kindly avoid reproducing the entire text. The best solution is to refer to the post number right in the beginning. Other members can also consider this suggestion which obviates even partial quoting. Pranams. Madathil Nair ___________________________ Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted September 29, 2002 Report Share Posted September 29, 2002 Note from the Moderator: Inspite of repeated requests, you continue to attach the copies of the previous messages of the thread. Please understand that the moderators don't have time to read and cut the unnecessary parts of your message. We appreciate your cooperation and please take time to erase the unnecessary parts of the message before sending to the list. My dear noble devotee of Sri Sankara Bhagavatpujyapada, Thank you very much for your kind advice and the concern you have for me.I very much appreciate it and hope to receive it in future also. 1.Yes, you are right . I am one who has joined your group with the hope of interacting with your members for using advaita to do research on language, with special reference to proverbs.When someone wants to apply something ,he should know about that something without which he cannot successfully apply it.So I am also trying to do research on advaita.In fact , I know more about advaita than before - relatively - after trying to do research using advaita. Incidentally,it is Sri Lalithamba and Sri Sankara Bhagavatpujyapada through the the Grace of Gayathri Matha that are responsible for entering into advaita for my research.It is a long story. I will tell you about it some other time.Sri Panini and Sri Anandavardhana and a host of others including Sri Sankara Bhagavatpujyapada Himself used advaita to explain language . SA IKSHETHER NA SABDATH involves language. Doesn't it ? Is it not using Advaita to explain the HOly NAMES of Sri Lalithamba in so many ways from Para to Pasyanthi to Madhyama to Vaikhari to Vimarsa rupini and so on? 6.Oh ,yes . I understand doing things without the feeling of agency. In fact I had some first hand experiences of this kind of approach.For example, when I fell of Astari, a great horse of our Unimaid and Horse-riding and Polo Club in UNimaid, Nigeria,I watched the body aching - I was not aching . Thanks to Sri Ashtavakra and OUR LORD SRI KRISHNA !!! When I was sitting on a lorry in the hot sun bringing seedlings to conduct a tree -planting campaign in Maiduguri; and so on. But these states do not remain continuously. Take the case of another fantastic experience of not enjoyment but BlISS I experienced. I was completely exhausted after conducting a leprosy campaign where 5 tons of food grains and clothes were distributed in the Molai Leprosy Hospital, Maiduguri and after the campaign was over, I came back and fell down on my bed. Then ,suddenly, sweetness ,pure sweetnes soaked my heart and that feeling stayed on for 20 minutes or so.Those actions were performed with zeal and determination but without the feeling of karthrutva ,you are talking of. But all these will go away.They do not last forever. It is only when , I think ,One roots out vasana and guna that one will UNINTERRUPTEDLY experience the kind of enjoyment you are talking about. Again ,even in the case of my research , had I not got involved with that kind of attitude, I would have gone mad. At every step in this research , I see the unseen hand of Sri Sankara Bhagavatpujyapada guiding me !!! Even the name of the model I coined came from the second slokam of Sri Dakshina Murthy written by my Lord Sri Sankara. It is my humble feeling that through language we can also go to the destination you are so much talking about. VAGVAI BRAMHA!!! PRAJNAM BRAMHA !!! I will send you a note after a month or so after I get free time on how using Advaita helped me to do research on advaita through Sri Lalithamba's HOLIEST NAMES as it happened in my real life experience.There is the whole of language in Sri Lalitha Sahasra Namam!!! May You Sing the Glory of Sri Lalithamba for ever !!! BY the by the Bliss I experienced on that day of the Leprosy campaign reminds me of the Bhaktamanasa Hamsika metaphor.On the lake of my mind,I was experiencing the Bliss of Swan moving !!! Do not think that I have Sri Lalithamba in Her full Glory in that experience!!! I am only trying to visualise with an ordinary experience what that would be. LOVE TO ALL CHILUKURI BHUVANESWAR --- Madathil Rajendran Nair <madathilnair wrote: Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.