Guest guest Posted October 25, 2002 Report Share Posted October 25, 2002 Namaste Sundar Rajanji writes (Post # 15057) I agree with Srinivasn-ji that the group members should discuss more on practical sadhana rather than dry semantics and grammar. Sankara has pointed out the futility of dry logic in Bhajagovinadam and Sivananda Lahiri etc......... I thought of discussing Sadhana by responding to the reply (of profvk Post # 14863). There is no doubt that Kama, Krodha and Loba are detrimental to Spiritual Progress. ProfVK rightly says these three should be abandoned. But how does one go about abandoning these? Do you directly tackle each of these and try to give up each one? Maybe. ...... ------------------------------ Lessons from My Experience - 1 The whole problem comes down to this: How to start and where? There need not be a uniform single answer to this from everybody. No answer could be THE ANSWER. Each one has his own experience. So I am going to talk from MY experience. And thereby I would abide by the suggestions of Srinivasan and Sundarrajan that we should share certain experiences of our teething troubles in the growth to spirituality. (For convenience I am dividing this into three posts. Pardon me for the length of the posts). As great seers have said, karma yoga and or bhakti yoga is one method to start with. But it seems the climate and mood in this particular discussion at the present moment are in terms of sAdhanA. That is God’s Will. So let me talk about some first thoughts of mine on meditative sAdhanA, in the Vedantic tradition. At many places in the following presentation, others may find it tempting to contradict me and say: No, it is not so. Let me remind all that I am talking about lessons from my own experience and so there is nothing absolute about it. Concentration, Contemplation, Meditation – these are three distinct (mental) functions or activities. Talking on the phone, playing chess, cooking in the kitchen, reading a novel, waiting to reply to the service in Tennis, writing an examination -- all these are quite familiar activities. In each of these we do bring our mind to a certain level of concentration. In each of these we do turn away the mind from things outside the purview of the task on hand. However, we do take in several things (pertaining to the task on hand) into our mental consideration, like what went before and what is ahead and we bring all of this to the mind at the same time for an overall comprehension and decision. So whatever amount of concentration we make on any of these, it cannot be called meditation. In whatever activity or subject the mind is concentrating, the process of thinking deeply on all the relevant matters is the next step. This also cannot become meditation. For, what the mind is engaged here is in putting together pieces of a puzzle .. Even though the subject under consideration is just one, the mind sorts and sifts several things to do the contemplation. While concentrating on the phone conversation, we think deeply about the possible reply we may have to give; and this thinking becomes deeper when the subject of the conversation is more substantial. While concentrating on playing chess, we certainly have the single focus of the chess, but we have to analyse and contemplate on the several moves ahead of us and to put them in apposition with the possible moves of the opponent. And so on for the other examples also. In most of these examples there is scope for excitement. So this kind of contemplation is not also meditation. What is then Meditation? It is the skill of keeping the mind in one DIRECTION on one OBJECT in a ONE-POINTED sharpness. That object could be a verbal expression, or could be a visual image. Or it could be something totally created by the mind in the mind. The goal of meditation is to merge in the object of meditation. Concentration and Contemplation are certainly prior stages for meditation. But what defines meditation as meditation is the act of stilling the mind in one direction, on one thing, at one point, without any excitement. What is further significant here is all this has to be done only by the mind. The obstacle to progress on this front is just another part of the same mind, namely the ego. What exactly does this ego achieve? Every time a thought wave arises in the mind, the ego comes to the forefront and claims the ownership of that thought wave. There is not a single thought wave that is not claimed by the ego as its own. We are all familiar with the ordinary event of a street scene that we may be watching through the window though we may not at all be concerned with that scene. This is exactly what we must do and should be doing, says the Mother (of Aurobindo Ashram), when thoughts arise in our mind during the attempt at meditation. This is exactly what Chinmayananda means when he says: ‘Watch the watcher!’ When we watch the street scene through the window there is an element of curiosity there. Even that curiosity should not be there when we watch the thoughts of the mind. Certainly there should not be any excitement. The thought may be anything. It may be the argument that we had two days earlier with a relative. It may be the money that we have to recover from a neighbor. It may be the gossip that we recently heard in a hush in the office about a colleague. It may be the discomfort in health about which we are yet in doubt whether to consult a doctor or not. It may be the telephone bell that is ringing and our conjectures as to who the caller could be. It may be the worry caused by a projected deficit in the domestic budget for the next month. Whatever the thought be, just watch it, as you are watching the street goings-on. Don’t try to analyse how or why the thought wave appeared. Do not raise new thoughts by attempting to weigh the pros and cons of the subject of the thought. Do not attempt to list the thoughts. Just watch ‘from a distance’ the thoughts come and go by, one by one. Don’t get involved in them; that is, don’t get into the content of the thoughts. Just watch. Don’t think that you are watching. Just be there, by yourself. Thoughts will certainly arise one after the other. But they will also disappear, one by one. The next thought may take a little while to come up. Let it be so. Don’t expect it to come. Don’t cognize it when it comes. Don’t think of it. Don’t think! ‘na kimcid-api cintayet’ says the Lord (VI – 25). It means ‘Don’t think of anything’. But this does not imply that your mind should be thinking of the void. No. Nor is it right to say ‘Think of the Atman only’. What is meant is : ‘The act of thinking should not be there’. That means: Be yourself. If you keep watching the thoughts ‘as if from a distance’, that is, if we don’t get involved in them, every thought that rises will disappear, one after the other. And all of them would have disappeared. Watch with patience the disappearance of all of them. The stilling of the mind by this non-involvement in the thoughts but being only a witness of them is exactly what is called ‘Atma-samsthaM manaH kR^itvA’ by the Lord (VI – 25). This does not mean ‘Keeping the mind in Atman’ as if Atman is something different and you have to ‘take’ your mind and ‘keep’ it there! When the mind is not thinking of anything that is non-self, it is supposed to be purest of the pure. That is when we are what we are. That is the real ‘I’. Question: We thought you are going to tell us practical methods for preventing the mind wandering; but you seem to be taking us to some incomprehensible heights of Vedanta. The reply to this is given by the Lord Himself. (To be continued) praNAms to all advaitins, profvk ===== Prof. V. Krishnamurthy My website on Science and Spirituality is http://www.geocities.com/profvk/ You can access my book on Gems from the Ocean of Hindu Thought Vision and Practice, and my father R. Visvanatha Sastri's manuscripts from the site. Y! Web Hosting - Let the expert host your web site http://webhosting./ Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted October 25, 2002 Report Share Posted October 25, 2002 Lessons from Experience - 2 Namaste. This is a continuation of No.1(Post #15067) How can the mind cease to think of anything? The very existence of the mind is confirmed only by thinking. So it is probably impossible to have the mind and still think of nothing. That is why the artifice of a japa is prescribed. Japa helps to anchor the mind at one place so that it does not think of several things and wander from one to the other. But that one place of anchor has to be the right place. Any object which is, even in a remote sense, connected to sense enjoyments cannot prove to be a good anchor for meditation. Because, these sense enjoyments would lead to an attachment, attachment to desire, desire to anger, and anger to disaster (cf. II – 62, 63) and this may happen right in the meditation period, if we had started with objects of sensual enjoyment as the object of meditation. If on the other hand, the object had been somewhat connected with the Divine then from that very Divine we would get help for our effort. But even when the object of meditation is about the divine, there are chances for the mind to get distracted. Suppose we are meditating on the form of Lord Venkatachalapati, the famous Lord of Tirupati Hills in South India. We keep thinking of the beautiful form of the Lord from head to foot and we revel in the beauty and majesty of the divine form. First the crown in the head. The splendid forehead ... the face ... the raised forearm ..... the ornaments around the neck .... the chest .. Goddess Lakshmi in the chest .... It is Lakshmi that gives everything ..... Even the Laddu that we got there was the Grace of the Goddess... When we came back from the temple by bus, it was the Laddu that came to our rescue when we were hungry .. What a winding journey by bus on those hills ... even last week there was an accident of toppling of the bus ... why do pilgrims die .... religion ... religious superstition ... other religions ... prejudice ... violence ... politics .. By this time the thoughts have gone far away from its anchor and the meditation has all gone down by the drain! This is why even when the object of meditation is the Divine, it is important that it should have one DIRECTION, one THING, at one POINT. It is for this very reason that japa of a mantra is recommended by all Indian teachers and sages. It is not as important to know the meaning of the mantra as to have faith in it. If you know the meaning, dwell on the meaning. If you don’t, dwell on the words. But remember, japa is not mindless repetition. Japa has to come from the heart, not the head. Japa with or without counting of the number of repetitions, but with your heart in it, is the best way to warm up the mental framework for it to be ready to plunge into the exercise of meditation. In the beginning stages, articulate the mantra orally. After some time, artculate it by lip movement, without the ears hearing it. When this becomes a routine then the next stage is to dwell on the words only mentally, without even the lip movement to help. QUESTION: Even then, there is the chance of the mind wandering away from the mantra. Why are you still avoiding the issue? No I am not. Here is the reply of Lord Krishna Himself to this observation about the mind wandering. ‘The restless and unsteady mind will certainly wander. But every time it wanders, from every direction it wanders into, bring it back, then and there, to the control of your self.’ (VI – 26). There is no other way. Let me repeat. There is no other way. Mind cannot continuously think of the same thing. So it wanders. And by that very reason, it thinks of several things. And when doing so, it cannot stay consistently on any single track. Therefore, by our voluntary effort, every time it wanders we have to bring it back to the same anchor of the mantra with which we started. This has to be done by long and persistent practice and a dispassion towards everything that is non-self. (VI – 35). Dispassion (vairAgya) is not to be mistaken for a negative characteristic. It is simply the wisdom born out of the ability to put everything in its place. In other words it is giving everything its due, neither more nor less. It is the attitude by which one can observe and analyse oneself critically. By practice and dispassion one learns to recognize that to keep the mind anchored to one object in a one-pointed way, the only way is to pull it back repeatedly. The mantra with which one begins the japa is a prop for this act of bringing back the mind. In due course of time and practice, mantra japa would become a silent japa. Even then, whenever the mind slips from its anchor, one has to resort to the same act of repeated trials of bringing back to its anchor, namely the Self. Here, when we say the anchor is the Self, we are referring to the stage where there is no thought of the non-self. QUESTION: When the mind has no thought of any object belonging to the non-self category, actually the mind has no thought content. If there was something in it, there is a meaning in saying ‘when the mind wanders, bring it back to the anchor-content’. But when there is nothing in it, to what do we bring it back? In other words, are we not coming back to the fundamental question: ‘How do we control the mind?’ Well, I have to bring the Masters, here, like Ramana Maharshi and others. (To be continued) praNAms to all advaitins, profvk ===== Prof. V. Krishnamurthy My website on Science and Spirituality is http://www.geocities.com/profvk/ You can access my book on Gems from the Ocean of Hindu Thought Vision and Practice, and my father R. Visvanatha Sastri's manuscripts from the site. Y! Web Hosting - Let the expert host your web site http://webhosting./ Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted October 25, 2002 Report Share Posted October 25, 2002 Lessons from Experience - 3 Namaste This is the concluding part in continuation of Nos.1 (#15067) and No.2 (#15068) The oral japa of the mantra in due course becomes a silent japa and finally leads on to meditation. This repetition of a mantra may appear to be wasteful to some, because they think mantra is just some mumbo-jumbo. But as the repetitions add up, slowly one will realise it is not so wasteful as all that. In due course the japa of the mantra becomes almost a cry from the bottom of the heart. Though the japa originally began with the mantra or the name, as the repetition soaks in, it becomes the object of the meditation itself. And that is what leads, in further time, to the stage where there does not arise any other thought. In case there is some such thought arising, of course there is Krishna’s recipe for the cure; namely, pull back the mind as said in VI – 26. Every time the mind has to be brought back to the object of meditation which is now the mantra and nothing else. Even after several attempts if you find it unsuccessful, stop the meditation then and there and begin after some time from scratch. No effort goes in vain in this process. When we said ‘after some time’ here, it could be a few minutes, hours or even days – depending upon the sAdhaka’s mood, his evolution and the force of his vAsanAs. So, first there is mantra japa. Then it becomes silent japa of the same mantra. Now even the counting of the repetition becomes an irrelevant distraction. The thought waves now arising are only about the mantra. These waves rise and fall one after the other. There might be a momentary gap between one thought wave and the next thought wave. The stage where there is no change of the object between two successive waves is the first success of meditation. If there is not even a momentary gap and the whole thing becomes a flat wave (no rise and fall) on the same object, this is the next success. Patanjali calls this one-pointed dhyAna (Sutra III – 12). In talking about this, see how the Paramacharya of Kanchi goes back to Adi Sankara’s graphic descriptions: “To talk about this dhyAna, the Bhagavat-pAda has a favourite phrase: ‘samAna-pratyaya-pravAha-karaNaM’. He has used this at several places. (Brahma sUtra bhAshya IV-1-7-8; Gita bhAshya: XII – 3). Just as water continuously flows in a single stream so also dhyAna has to flow in the same direction towards the same object. Another expression is ‘taila-dhArAvat’, meaning, the flow of oil without any iota of break”. ( Deivathin Kural, in Tamil, vol.6, p.561. What were so far separate waves of thought, has now become, without having any rise and fall, one single large wave, flat, with a single thought, directed towards a single object at a single point. When the mind stays there consistently, that is when the serene calm of meditation descends on the mind and becomes bliss itself that is natural to the Atman. Now comes Shri Ramana’s reply to the question we raised earlier about the control of the mind. Ramana Maharshi speaking: Initially the mind does not realise the bliss of dhyAna. The cow of our house likes to graze on the grass of the neighbour’s house and constantly likes to run away to the other lawn. However green and dense the grass may be in our own garden, she is enamoured only of the grass across the fence. Man’s mind is also like that. So in the beginning one has to draw it back every time and ‘anchor’ it to a pole. But slowly, ‘it will realise that there is happiness in the very meditation itself and that, that happiness-cum-bliss surpasses all the happiness that comes from material objects’. Once that is realised by the mind, then there is no necessity for it to be drawn back or to be tethered to a prop. It will automatically stay at the ‘anchor’. I conclude here without continuing, because my sAdhana has to continue. Thanks, every one, for bearing with me to read this. praNAms to all advaitins, profvk ===== Prof. V. Krishnamurthy My website on Science and Spirituality is http://www.geocities.com/profvk/ You can access my book on Gems from the Ocean of Hindu Thought Vision and Practice, and my father R. Visvanatha Sastri's manuscripts from the site. Y! Web Hosting - Let the expert host your web site http://webhosting./ Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted October 25, 2002 Report Share Posted October 25, 2002 advaitin, "V. Krishnamurthy" <profvk> wrote: > Lessons from Experience - 3 > > Namaste > This is the concluding part in continuation of Nos.1 (#15067) > and No.2 (#15068) > Namaste, Thank you very much for an outstanding first-person account. It would not be an exaggeration to say that study and practice of the Gita alone can be the highest sadhana. The 540 verses uttered by Krishna are potent mantras; recite one, or more, that applies to one's particular situation at any time, any place, and its assurance of both 'abhyudaya' and 'niHshreyas' will be fulfilled. That has been my experience. yaM labdhvaa chaaparaM laabhaM manyate naadhikaM tataH . yasminsthito na duHkhena guruNaapi vichaalyate .. 6\.22.. taM vidyaad.h duHkhasa.nyogaviyogaM yogasa.nGYitam.h . sa nishchayena yoktavyo yogo.anirviNNachetasaa .. 6\.23.. Regards, Sunder Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted October 25, 2002 Report Share Posted October 25, 2002 slowly, `it will realise that there is happiness in the very > meditation itself and that, that happiness-cum-bliss surpasses > all the happiness that comes from material objects'. Once that > is realised by the mind, then there is no necessity for it to be > drawn back or to be tethered to a prop. It will automatically > stay at the `anchor'. > > I conclude here without continuing, because my sAdhana has to > continue. > Thanks, every one, for bearing with me to read this. > praNAms to all advaitins, > profvk ======================= Pranam profvk! This experience of yours will inspire me for weeks to come... ....we dont have to search for a Guru anywhere, its the very advaitin group that can be a Guru to itself...the satsang will (should) make us reveal our true self ( looks very near but unreachable initially ). only one's true self can guide a sadhaka forward...until then we'll follow the scriptual advice and take stregnth from the experiences of the satsangers. >From the inspiring postings i got from profvk, Suder rajan, Harsha, sunderh and all others this week... i wish to try a 3 hour(non stop) gayatri manthra chanting with our satsangers in sacramento .. --- fixing the gaze to the tip of the nose (Gita) -- Assuming a padmasana pose ( as long as possible ) -- chanting one Gayathri slowly for the whole minute (feeling the vibrations while chanting) -- no break for whole three hours. i request your wishes in my quest ... Pranams to advaitins V.Srinivasan Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted October 25, 2002 Report Share Posted October 25, 2002 Namaste Srinivasan writes: i wish to try a 3 hour(non stop) gayatri manthra chanting with our satsangers in sacramento .. --- fixing the gaze to the tip of the nose (Gita) -- Assuming a padmasana pose ( as long as possible ) -- chanting one Gayathri slowly for the whole minute (feeling the vibrations while chanting) -- no break for whole three hours. i request your wishes in my quest ... --------------------------- My best wishes, Srinivasanji. Just a suggestion. The chanting of Gayatri at the right pace with proper intonations will take usually 18 seconds. Your intention to chant one gayathri for a one full minute is likely to be distracting the concentration. Try and tell me. Secondly, even Sankara himself when commenting on the meaning of 'samprekshya nAsikAgram svaM' (VI - 13) has said that your gaze should be 'as it were' at the tip of the nose, and not really. The purpose, he says, is to withdraw the dRShTi from all external objects. So it is not necessary to give importance to the physical gymnastics of looking at the tip of the nose. But it is necessary not to look at any external object. So, closing the eyes is the best bet for a beginner. Of course, one should see that one does not doze off to sleep. In fact this is the reason mentioned by many teachers for the 'look at the tip of the nose'. What is important is, not to doze off, not to be distracted by what the eyes see, not to be distracted by any rigid disciplines such as 'looking at the tip of the nose', and so on. That is why a mantra japa. Concentrate on the mantra and its meaning. That will also prevent you from dozing off. Good luck. praNAms to all advaitins profvk ===== Prof. V. Krishnamurthy My website on Science and Spirituality is http://www.geocities.com/profvk/ You can access my book on Gems from the Ocean of Hindu Thought Vision and Practice, and my father R. Visvanatha Sastri's manuscripts from the site. Y! Web Hosting - Let the expert host your web site http://webhosting./ Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.