Guest guest Posted December 24, 2002 Report Share Posted December 24, 2002 Namaste: On behalf of all of you, let me welcome Sri Ramgopal, a new member to the list. We can look forward to his active participation with his thoughtful insights. Warmest regards, Ram Chandran ================================ "ramgop123 <ramgop123" <ramgop123 Respected Sir, My name is Ramgopal from Chennai.I have just joined the advaitin yet to get the confirmation of my inclusion in the list. When i was browsing the discussions i was looking at the discussion of "Is acquisition is the road for Happiness" i wanted to forward a mail received my me from my B'law in the US.Please go thro the same and pls forward the same to the group members. Thanks and Regards R.Ramgopal --- As we don't have class this week, just to be in touch with the teaching, I thought I will write this as it is very interesting and the subject is also something everyone would like. We have heard in cassette 14 of Tattva Bodha about the 3 degrees of ananda we could get from the world – namely Priya, Moda and Pramoda. At this point, I thought I will write something I have heard in Taitiriya Upanishad on how it analyses Ananda. These are the teachings of the Veda and not my own. Ananda can be translated in English as joy or happiness. We may think what is there to be analyzed in that. But the analysis in Taitiriya Upanishad is in the form of finding out the source of ananda – where is it coming from. One thing to have in mind, which is a very important axiom in Vedanta is"whichever is a nature of a vastu (thing), then that thing should have that nature (or property) all the time". For eg. if the nature of fire is heat, then whenever there is fire, there will be heat. We can say fire has heat as its very own nature. There is no time we can say that there is fire but there is no heat. Lets have this in mind and continue the discussion. Lets take an example of buying a car. Lets say I have been wanting to buy a particular car and have been watching the prices, etc. and just can't wait to buy that car. One fine day I buy it and start to enjoy that. Now, lets analyze in the Upanishad's method where from this joy is coming. If it is coming from the car itself, two things should be true. First, the car should be the source of joy for me all the time and secondly, it should be the cause of joy for everyone (meaning anyone having the car should be happy). But, what I find is, when the car gets older or when I find my insurance goes higher or whatever be the reason, it ceases to give me the joy that it gave me before. If we go further, we can say, it becomes a source of sorrow sometime down the road and I want to get rid of it. So, it is not a source of joy all the time, which means that there is no Ananda in the car that seemed to have it. Lets see if it gives Ananda to all. Again, we can see that it was not a source of ananda for the dealer or the car-salesman who sold it. Not only that, actually getting rid of it is what gives him ananda. So, considering both these instances, we can easily see that the car cannot be the source of joy. There were 2 entities involved when I had the car with me the first time. One was the car and the other one was my mind which had wanted the car. Now lets see if the second entity, the mind, if that is the source of ananda. Again, if it is the source of joy, it should be happy by itself but I see that it was happy only after the car had come. So, it cannot have joy on its own. So, where is this ananda or joy coming from, is the question put forward by the Upanishad. Then it goes on to say that it is coming from you, the Atma who is different from the mind and the body. The mind enjoys a temporary status in which it doesn't need anything. There is no desire at that time for the mind and then the nature of Me the Atma gets reflected and it looks as though the joy has come from outside. Then, after sometime the mind gets occupied by some other desire and then works on it and it looks as though it lost the joy that it had sometime before. This is why we think that we got joy from some thing and then after sometime even though that thing is still with us, we seem to not have that same joy. This is the same for any blessed object in the world. So, there is a third entity which is a witness of all these and that is the source of joy. This is like, when I see an object, I am there the seer and then the object is there, but I lose sight of the light that makes it happen and so there is a third entity which is conveniently missed by me. Why do I say I missed it? Because, I don't count the light when I say how many objects are there, I just count me and the object I saw. The Atma, the I, is very similarly missed. The Upanishad points it out and says that You, the Atma is the only source of joy. This Atma is the subject of the Tattva Bodha we are currently studying. We have seen till now what I am not. The coming classes will be telling who I am. When I say I, the Upanishad does not mean the `I' as we know. It is the `I' pointed out by Vedanta which is the only source of ananda. There is more logic to prove that this I is the only source of Ananda, but we will discuss that some other time. And when I say `I', there might be a question in our minds, whose `I' is that?. Actually, if we are able to grasp the `I' that the Upanishads point out, we will come to know that there is only one `I' and there is no second `I'. This is what is meant when the Veda points out saying "Ekameva advitiyam", meaning "the only and the non-dual". Till now, in Tattva Bodha we have seen what this Atma is not. The coming classes in Tattva Bodha will be addressing this `I', the Atma, what it is and reveal its nature. Hari Om. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.