Guest guest Posted March 9, 2003 Report Share Posted March 9, 2003 Namaste all, This second section is short and a simple statement of advaita and ends with the the direction to find the teacher. The first verse....and its various repetitions later...have always concerned me inasmuch as the practice of neti neti is an action, no matter how fine an action of reflection, and as an action it cannot reveal the Atman. It can only burnish the mirror as it were as long as the mirror is believed to exist. That said, if the mahavakya ayam atman brahma is to be realised, then the practice is valid. With this in mind I prefer Alston's translation in this instance but that is only my opinion so I include the three translations of the crucial part of the first verse: CHAPTER II NEGATION 1. Impossible to be negated, the Self is left over on the authority of the Shruti, ‘Not this, not this.’ So, the Self becomes clearly known on the reflection (Jagadananda), [One attains it in some such way (mayeda)] [it is directly apprehended (alston), ‘I am not this, I am not this.’ 2. The consciousness of egoism (i.e., the mistaken identity of the Self with the body etc.,) has its origin in the intellect and has for its object what (name and form) is based on words (Ch.Up.6.1.4-6) only. As its very nature and origin are both negated (by the Shruti, ‘Not this, not this’), egoism can never again be regarded as founded on any evidence. 3. A subsequent knowledge does not arise without negating the previous one (e.g., the knowledge of the rope does not come without destroying that of the snake in a rope-snake). Pure Consciousness, the Self, only has all independent existence and is never negated as it is the result of evidences. 4. One attains one’s own innermost Self by crossing the forest of this body infested with ferocious beasts of grief, delusion etc., like the man of the country of Gandhara who crossed the forest and reached his own country. (Ch.Up. 6.14) Happy studying Ken Knight Tax Center - forms, calculators, tips, more http://taxes./ Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted March 9, 2003 Report Share Posted March 9, 2003 Kenji, In the following paragraph:: > 3. A subsequent knowledge does not arise without > negating the previous one (e.g., the knowledge of the > rope does not come without destroying that of the > snake in a rope-snake). Pure Consciousness, the Self, > only has all independent existence and is never > negated as it is the result of evidences. > did you mean "Pure Consciousness, the Self, only has all independent existence and is never negated as it is *NOT* the result of evidences"? The Self is Self Evident. I do not need to consult the Shruti to "prove" or provide evidence for my existence. I know that I exist prior to my knowing anything else. Everything else is known following the knowledge that I exist. This every lay person knows. Then what does the Shruti provide? It knocks off all false conclusions that are present regarding the Self evident Self. Today the Self-evident Self is taken to be the not self. The shruti shows me the Self-evident Self as it IS. regards, --Satyan Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted March 10, 2003 Report Share Posted March 10, 2003 --- Satyan Chidambaran <satyan_c wrote: > > 3. A subsequent knowledge does not arise > without > > negating the previous one (e.g., the knowledge of > the > > rope does not come without destroying that of the > > snake in a rope-snake). Pure Consciousness, the > Self, > > only has all independent existence and is never > > negated as it is the result of evidences. > > > > > did you mean "Pure Consciousness, the Self, only has > > all independent existence and is never negated as it > is > *NOT* the result of evidences"? Namaste Satyan, The above translation ( without the NOT ) is as given by Swami Jagadananda and in a footnote he refers us back to verses 103 and 108 in the prose section Maybe you would like to have a look at these...they were posted a while back in this series so if you go to the archives you can pick them up from there. If that does not work I will copy and paste them in a reply for you. I had the same query as yourself when I read these words. Mayeda and Alston try to translate the relevant text differently: Mayeda: 'The Seeing (=Atman) is one alone, self-established. As It is the result [of the right means of knowledge] It is not negated.' He also refers us back to the same verses as above but also to Ch. Up. II.2.77;93 Alston: 'The one Seer is self-revealed. Beacause it is itself the resultant awareness (in all knowledge process) it is Itself never contradicted.' He then notes (never-contradicted: It could contradict itself only if it were different from itself.) The Sanskrit is: d^RiShir ekaH svayaM-siddhaH phalatvAt sa na bAdhyate > > The Self is Self Evident. I do not need > to consult the Shruti to "prove" or provide evidence > for my existence. I know that I exist prior to my > knowing > anything else. Everything else is known following > the > knowledge that I exist. This every lay person knows. This is indeed the problem. In order to establish duality or difference 'I' have to claim existence. Would you say that there is an important teaching on 'aham' ( I am)...the feeling of existence, to be teased out on this one? > > Then what does the Shruti provide? It knocks off all > false conclusions that are present regarding the > Self > evident Self. Today the Self-evident Self is taken > to be > the not self. The shruti shows me the Self-evident > Self > as it IS. When the RgVeda says: ‘What thing I truly am I know not clearly; mysterious, fettered in my mind I wander.' Rg Veda 1.164.37 it is giving us the essential verse to begin our enquiry into 'Who am I?' and then proceed though the neti neti process being taught by Shankara in this section. Many thanks for your comments. Maybe you can come back with your thought on the verses 103 and 108. Best wishes ken Knight > regards, > --Satyan > > Tax Center - forms, calculators, tips, more http://taxes./ Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.