Guest guest Posted March 10, 2003 Report Share Posted March 10, 2003 REPLY TO SRI GREG GOODE: >This construct of Benjamin's is the core of his perplexity. In fact, it >is not Benjamin's experience that there is any separate locus >of >consciousness. That is, he doesn't experience Venkat >experiencing anything. >He doesn't experience himself experiencing anything. There is >just >experience, consciousness. It is my direct experience that I am a separate locus of consciousness, distinct from other loci of consciousness called, e.g., Greg, Venkat. However, within my consciousness, I cannot distinguish between subject and object, as I have discussed. I certainly do not experience Venkat's consciousness, but I am sure that he does. But within his consciousness, there is no real difference between subject and object, even if he thinks there is. That is, within his consciousness, which I assume to be similar to mine in a broad sense, the words 'subject' and 'object' point to the same awareness. Really, this collapse of subject and object is the same as the statement 'There is just experience, consciousness'. So we agree. On the other hand, the statement 'He doesn't experience himself experiencing anything' is the same kind of linguistic confusion as 'subject' and 'object'. By counting words, there seem to be a number of distinct entities: 'He', 'experience', 'himself', ... All these refer to the same immediate awareness of Benjamin. Any distinction between Benjamin and his experience was never made by Benjamin, and if it was made by anyone else, it was due to the confusion of words, where different words seemed to refer to different things. >Yes, consciousness is not owned by anyone or trapped inside a body >or mind. >The body and mind are appearances in consciousness - >which is no one's. 'Body' and 'mind' are perceptions, thoughts and feelings within consciousness, as I have always maintained. Furthermore, even the word 'within' is misleading, since consciousness is not like a box containing items called perceptions, thoughts and feelings. The perceptions, thoughts and feelings are identical to the consciousness itself and represent different 'modes' of consciousness. So in this sense, I agree that 'body and mind are appearances in consciousness'. However, I still clearly see a distinction between the particular stream of consciousness that we might label 'Ben' or 'X' and another stream of consciousness that we might label 'Greg' or 'Y'. The experiences of one of them are not experiences of the other. I have no use for the word 'owner', but I still wish to maintain the evident distinction between two streams of consciousness. <http://rd./M=247865.3003379.4374531.2848452/D=egroupweb/S=1705075991:H\ M/A=1482387/R=0/*http://ads.x10.com/?bHlhaG9vaG0xLmRhd=1047155716%3eM=247865.300\ 3379.4374531.2848452/D=egroupweb/S=1705075991:HM/A=1482387/R=1=1047155716%3eM=24\ 7865.3003379.4374531.2848452/D=egroupweb/S=1705075991:HM/A=1482387/R=2>582db3b.j\ pg 582e4f8.jpg Discussion of Shankara's Advaita Vedanta Philosophy of nonseparablity of Atman and Brahman. Advaitin List Archives available at: <http://www.eScribe.com/culture/advaitin/>http://www.eScribe.com/culture/advaiti\ n/ To Post a message send an email to : advaitin Messages Archived at: <advaitin/messages>a\ dvaitin/messages Your use of is subject to the <> Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.