Guest guest Posted March 10, 2003 Report Share Posted March 10, 2003 Hi Benjamin, You wrote, >If this happened to you - and I have no reason or inclination to >disbelieve it - then you are very lucky. For me, it's still >basically theoretical, with occasional flashes of insight and >inspiration. This gave me another idea on how to approach this, though the approach we are already on is fine. This one is more experiential. I've looked through your many messages and see the following. 1. For you, it seems that the distinction between the subject and object of thoughts has vanished. 2. But there's still a distinction between what seems to be "this thoughtstream" and "other thoughtstreams." For me, it happened the other way around (and this is in another online essay). 1. First, the distinction between various subjects vanished. I no longer experienced myself as a separate subject, nor was any other thing experienced as a subject. There was subject and stream of arisings, but it wasn't mine or localized in any way. There wasn't felt to be one subject per person, but rather the Subject or Witness. So this was still a perceivable distinction between the arising objects and the Subject to which they arose. 2. This felt wonderful, but that wasn't the point. It wasn't quite what Advaita was talking about, there was still that subject/object dualism. I was using the Advaita teachings of my satguru Krishna Menon as a guide. So I looked into this subject/object distinction very very intently for several years. Every minute that the mind wasn't doing something else, it immediately became drawn to and melted in that contemplation. Then one day, the gap disappeared. I'll get bask to your posts in a more substantial way sometime today... Harih OM, --Greg Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.