Guest guest Posted March 19, 2003 Report Share Posted March 19, 2003 Shunyavaada is easily the most misunderstood doctrine in Indian philosophy. Apart from the common misunderstanding of shunyavaada as nihilism, modern misinterpretations of the doctrine range from : shunyataa means the untenability of spirituality itself; or the mere intellectual understanding of shunyata is all and thus there's no need for spiritual practice; or Naagaarjuna is anti-absolutist or he taught the non-existence of the self etc etc etc. To counter such misinterpretations we present certain verses from the Mulamaadhayamaka Kaarikaa. These verses are littered all over the text and they form the instructional aspect of the Mulamaadhyamaka Kaarikaa - these instructionas are apart from the dialectical aspect of shunyavaada which normally mesmerizes/seduces most students of the philosophy who believe the dialectic to be the end all of shunyavaada. The instructional aspect points to the relevance/limit of shunyataa, what shunyataa doesn't stand for, what needs to be done after understanding shunyataa, what Naagaarjuna stood for and what he didn't stand for, what he considered as the final objective etc. We would like students of Naagaarjuna to contemplate on these verses. Examination of elements : fools and reificationists who perceive the existence or non-existence of objects do not see the pacification of objectification. Examination of aggregates : therefore think about form but do not construct theories about form. Examination of the conditioned : whatever is dependant arising such a thing is essentially peaceful. Examination of fire and fuel : I do not think that those who teach that the self is the same or different from the entities understand the meaning of the doctrine. Examination of compounded phenomena : The victorious ones have said that emptiness is the relinquishing of all views. For whomsoever emptiness is a view that one will accomplish nothing. Examination of essence : Those who see essence and essential differences and entities and non-entities, they do not see the truth taught by the Buddha. To say "it is" is to grasp for permanence. To say "it is not" is to adopt the view of nihilism. Therefore a wise person does not say "exists" or "does not exist". "Whatever exists though its essence cannot be non-existent" is eternalism. "It existed before but doesn't now" entails the error of nihilism. Examination of Bondage : "I, without grasping, will pass beyond sorrow and I will attain nirvana," one says. Whoever grasps like this has a great grasping. Examination of actions and their fruits : self restraint and benefiting others with a compassionate mind is dharma. Abandonment of action occurs through meditation. Examination of self and entities : From the pacification of the self and what belongs to it, one abstains from grasping onto "I" and "mine". When views of "I" and "mine" are extinguished, whether with respect to the internal or external, the appropriator ceases. This having ceased, birth ceases. Action and misery having ceased there is nirvana. Action and misery come from conceptual thought. This comes from mental fabrication. Fabrication ceases through emptiness. What language expresses is non-existent. The sphere of thought is non- existent. Unarisen and unceased like nirvana are the nature of things. Examination of Tathaagatha : "Empty" should not be asserted. "Non empty" should not be asserted. Neither both nor neither should be asserted. They are only used nominally. One who grasps the view that the Tathaagatha exists, having seized the Buddha, constructs conceptual fabrications about one who has achieved nirvana. Examination of errors : If the self and the pure, the permanent and the blissful existed, the self, the pure, the permanent and the blissful would not be deceptive. If the self and the pure, the permanent and the blissful did not exist, the non-self, the impure, the permanent and suffering would not exist. Thus through the cessation of error ignorance ceases. When ignorance ceases the compounded phenomena, etc cease. Examination of the four noble truths : We say that this understanding of yours of emptiness and the purpose of emptiness and of the significance of emptiness is incorrect. As a consequence you are harmed by it. The Buddha's teaching of the dharma is based on two truths : a truth of worldly convention and an ultimate truth. Without a foundation in the conventional truth, the significance of the ultimate cannot be taught. Without understanding the significance of the ultimate liberation is not achieved. Whoever sees dependant arising also sees suffering and its arising and its cessation as well as the path. Examination of nirvana : whatever is the limit of nirvana, that is the limit of cyclic existence. There is not even the slightest difference between them or even the subtlest thing. The pacification of all objectification and the pacification of illusion : no dharma was taught by the Buddha at any time, in any place, to any person. Examination of the twelve links : The root of cyclic existence is action. Therefore the wise one does not act. Therefore the unwise is the agent. The wise one is not because of his insight. With the cessation of ignorance action will not arise. This cessation of ignorance occurs through meditation and wisdom. Examination of Views : the self is neither identical nor different from the knowing. There is no self without knowing. But it is not true that it does not exist. I prostrate to Gautama who through compassion taught the true doctrine which leads to the relinquishing of all views. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted March 19, 2003 Report Share Posted March 19, 2003 I'll insert comments under the verses in caps to enable people to look out for certain important things : Examination of elements : fools and reificationists who perceive the existence or non-existence of objects do not see the pacification of objectification. COMMENT : PACIFICATION OF OBJECTIFICATION IS THE GOAL OF THE MAADHYAMAKA. Examination of aggregates : therefore think about form but do not construct theories about form. COMMENT : THINKING AS SUCH IS NOT FROWNED UPON BECAUSE IT HAS A PRACTICAL UTILITY. ONLY CONCEPTUAL CONSTRUCTION (METAPHYSICAL SPECULATION) IS. PEOPLE SHOULD LEARN TO DISTINGUISH BETWEEN CONCEPTUAL KNOWLEDGE, EXPERENTIAL KNOWLEDGE AND ABSOLUTE KNOWLEDGE, AND WHAT THE UTILITY OF EACH IS. Examination of the conditioned : whatever is dependant arising such a thing is essentially peaceful. COMMENT : EVERYTHING IN THE WORLD IS DEPENDENTLY ARISEN. AND NAAGAARJUNA ACCEPTS THAT EVERYTHING IS ESSENTIALLY PEACEFUL. Examination of fire and fuel : I do not think that those who teach that the self is the same or different from the entities understand the meaning of the doctrine. COMMENT : FOR UNDERSTANDING THE ABOVE VERSE ONE SHOULD BE FAMILIAR WITH THE DIALECTIC - THIS IS WHERE NAAGAARJUNA REDEFINES THE UNDERSTANDING OF THE SELF. Examination of compounded phenomena : The victorious ones have said that emptiness is the relinquishing of all views. For whomsoever emptiness is a view that one will accomplish nothing. COMMENT : THE LIMIT OF SHUNYATAA - IT SHOULD NOT BE MADE A VIEW IN ITSELF. Examination of essence : Those who see essence and essential differences and entities and non-entities, they do not see the truth taught by the Buddha. COMMENT : THE ABOVE VERSE IS THE ESSENCE OF THE MAADHYAMAKA DIALECTIC. AS ARYADEVA SAYS : ONE WHO UNDERSTANDS THE SHUNYATAA OF ONE ENTITY, UNDERSTANDS THE SHUNYATAA OF ALL. To say "it is" is to grasp for permanence. To say "it is not" is to adopt the view of nihilism. Therefore a wise person does not say "exists" or "does not exist". COMMENT : THE ABOVE VERSE MIGHT INDICATE ANTI-ABSOLUTISM. BUT THE FOLLOWING VERSE MAKES SURE IT IS NOT SO. "Whatever exists though its essence cannot be non-existent" is eternalism. "It existed before but doesn't now" entails the error of nihilism. Examination of Bondage : "I, without grasping, will pass beyond sorrow and I will attain nirvana," one says. Whoever grasps like this has a great grasping. COMMENT : THIS IS THE ESSENCE OF THE MAADHYAMAKA PATH - THE MENTAL AMBIVALANCE WHICH IS SO VITAL FOR SPIRITUAL GROWTH. THE VERSE ALSO UNDERLINES NAAGAARJUNA'S OBJECTION TO PRE-ADVAITA ATMAVAADA. Examination of actions and their fruits : self restraint and benefiting others with a compassionate mind is dharma. Abandonment of action occurs through meditation. COMMENT : BOTH THE ABOVE VERSE INDICATE THAT THE MERE DIALECTIC OF SHUNYAVAADA IS NOT THE END ALL OF THE SYSTEM. THERE'S A PRACTICE PART OF IT WHICH NECESSARILY FOLLOWS. Examination of self and entities : From the pacification of the self and what belongs to it, one abstains from grasping onto "I" and "mine". When views of "I" and "mine" are extinguished, whether with respect to the internal or external, the appropriator ceases. This having ceased, birth ceases. Action and misery having ceased there is nirvana. Action and misery come from conceptual thought. This comes from mental fabrication. Fabrication ceases through emptiness. COMMENT : THE ABOVE THREE VERSE ILLUSTRATE THE ESSENCE OF THE MAADHYAMAKA PATH. What language expresses is non-existent. The sphere of thought is non- existent. Unarisen and unceased like nirvana are the nature of things. COMMENT : THE ABOVE IS THE LIMIT OF THE SHUNYAVAADA. "WHAT LANGUAGE EXPRESSES" - CONCEPTUAL THINKING - THIS IS WHAT IS NEGATED BY THE MAADHYAMAKA. THE MAADHYAMAKA HAS NO STAND, EITHER POSITIVE OR NEGATIVE, ON METAPHYSICS/ONTOLOGY. Examination of Tathaagatha : "Empty" should not be asserted. "Non empty" should not be asserted. Neither both nor neither should be asserted. They are only used nominally. COMMENT : AGAIN THE RELEVANCE AND LIMIT OF SHUNYAVAADA. One who grasps the view that the Tathaagatha exists, having seized the Buddha, constructs conceptual fabrications about one who has achieved nirvana. COMMENT : THE ABOVE VERSE ALSO EXPRESSES THE BUDDHIST CONCERN ABOUT METAPHYSICAL SPECULATION - SUCH EFFORT IS ABSOLUTELY USELESS. Examination of errors : If the self and the pure, the permanent and the blissful existed, the self, the pure, the permanent and the blissful would not be deceptive. If the self and the pure, the permanent and the blissful did not exist, the non-self, the impure, the permanent and suffering would not exist. COMMENT : THE ABOVE TWO VERSES INDICATE THAT THE MAADHYAMIKA NEITHER ACCEPTS NOR REJECTS A SELF. Thus through the cessation of error ignorance ceases. When ignorance ceases the compounded phenomena, etc cease. Examination of the four noble truths : We say that this understanding of yours of emptiness and the purpose of emptiness and of the significance of emptiness is incorrect. As a consequence you are harmed by it. COMMENT : SHUNYA HAS NO PHILOSOPHICAL VALUE - IT IS A MERE TOOL TO RAISE THE STUDENT TO A HIGHER LEVEL OF SPIRITUAL AWARENESS. The Buddha's teaching of the dharma is based on two truths : a truth of worldly convention and an ultimate truth. COMMENT : PARAMAARTHA AND SAMVRITTI. Without a foundation in the conventional truth, the significance of the ultimate cannot be taught. Without understanding the significance of the ultimate liberation is not achieved. COMMENT : VERY IMPORTANT VERSE ABOVE. UNDERLINES THE UTILITY OF CONCEPTUAL/EXPERENTIAL KNOWLEDGE - TO ENABLE PEOPLE TO HAVE THE RIGHT CONCEPT OF REALITY. IT IS ONLY WITH THE RIGHT IDEA THAT THE OBJECT THAT THE IDEA REPRESENTS CAN BE ACHIEVED. Whoever sees dependant arising also sees suffering and its arising and its cessation as well as the path. COMMENT : IF ONE UNDERSTANDS THIS VERSE, ONE IS SECURELY ON THE RIGHT PATH. Examination of nirvana : whatever is the limit of nirvana, that is the limit of cyclic existence. There is not even the slightest difference between them or even the subtlest thing. The pacification of all objectification and the pacification of illusion : no dharma was taught by the Buddha at any time, in any place, to any person. Examination of the twelve links : The root of cyclic existence is action. Therefore the wise one does not act. Therefore the unwise is the agent. The wise one is not because of his insight. With the cessation of ignorance action will not arise. This cessation of ignorance occurs through meditation and wisdom. COMMENT : AGAIN THE LIMIT OF SHUNYAVAADA DIALECTIC. BEYOND THAT ONE NEEDS TO MEDITATE TO ATTAIN THE GOAL. Examination of Views : the self is neither identical nor different from the knowing. There is no self without knowing. But it is not true that it does not exist. COMMENT : AGAIN NAAGAARJUNA UNDERLINES THE INCONCEIVABILITY OF THE SELF. I prostrate to Gautama who through compassion taught the true doctrine which leads to the relinquishing of all views. COMMENT : THE END GOAL OF THE DIALECTIC - TO ABANDON ALL VIEWS. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.