Guest guest Posted May 13, 2003 Report Share Posted May 13, 2003 Namaste All,IMO, These concepts are in illusion of course and the concept of Avatar is quite fundamental and dvaitic. As the word Avatar means to cross down, we are all technically Avatars. A Jivanmukti is free of ego and any trace of mind. The mind is the universal at this stage. An Avatar is someone who has stopped short of Moksha so the one thought to help will cause a rebirth. I cannot appreciate the proposition that an Avatar is a descent of Saguna Brahman. Why would that be necessary when there are Jivanmuktis? Saguna doesn't take birth anymore than Nirguna does. So there has to be a vehicle and that vehicle can only be someone who hasn't taken Moksha so to speak. So logically there is a great difference between an Avatar, who has a mind and a Jivanmukti who doesn't. This is of course very dualistic as the Vaishnavas are, and Avatar is a necessary concept for pure Bhaktas, especially the type as Vaishnavas..........ONS.......Tony. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.