Guest guest Posted June 19, 2003 Report Share Posted June 19, 2003 Hello Benjamin, What you detail there from the O.T. and the Koran could be described as the tribal rules of engagement. It was their version of the ultimate deterrent. You fight and win or you die and so do all your relations. In that way you would fight only 'rightous' wars that you were sure you could win. In a sense that was their version of M.A.D. (mutual assured destruction) which has actually served us well until recently. It is deeply unpleasant reading but wonderfully deterring to the hasty hotheads. Remember also that the O.T. is a history book with all the special pleading that implies. The Psalms and the Book of Job are there too. Will advaitins please pardon my lapse into dual speak but I want to sketch an idea in the form that most faithful will understand (of all faiths). Throughout the ages the Divine and the human intersect through the mediation of saints, sages, qutubs, prophets and avatars addressing the particular predicaments of that age in a language that age and that people can understand. Any serious reading of a scripture bears this in mind. It is only the fundamentalists that regard a scripture as absolutely unequivocally true for all times. By the way, those with a negative view of religion who gather those quotes agree with them, not you Benjamin you're only passing them along. Not to have a perspective is impossible. We have moved on from tribal R.O.E to M.A.D. The successive waves of saints and sages are expressing the goal of universal brotherhood progressively clarifying that vision in their reading of the scriptures. Still the fundamentalist reading is omnipresent. Are those that read the Koran and the Mahabharatha in the original, as they see it, capable of eroding the sense of M.A.D. that cools the secular temper. I don't know. India getting involoved in Iraq to humiliate the vanquished Muslim is a low, cheap idea and bad policy. So Benjamin the idea is this - scriptures are read - scriptures are interpreted - the interpretation that follows the trajectory of the saints' readings is to be trusted. That isn't in the least naive but requires a meditative attention to the signs of the times. Shanti,Michael. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.