Guest guest Posted June 23, 2003 Report Share Posted June 23, 2003 Namaste! A while back I compared Mahayana 'emptiness' to Advaitin concepts, and it may have seemed as if I was mixing apples and oranges. Lately, I have started to explore the excellent website I mentioned earlier which provides a translation of much Vedic material: http://www.himalayanacademy.com/books/ It turns out that the Vedas and Upanishads also wrestle with concepts such as Nonbeing, Nothingness, Void, Emptiness and so forth. In fact, anyone who tries to penetrate beyond mere conventional concepts concerning the divine ends up in this no-man's land, where Being and Nonbeing are two sides of the same coin. This is but an expression of the ineffability of ultimate truth. The following quotation from the translator's commentary may whet your appetite to explore this website further. It is said that the Vedas are as little read as they are respected (except for the Upanishads). Thanks to the internet, we can easily start to change that, a few pages at a time. Part I, Chapter A - Prelude " What is fascinating about the experience of the Vedic seers is not only that they have dared to explore the outer space of being and existence, piercing the outskirts of reality, exploring the boundaries of the universe, describing being and its universal laws, but that they have also undertaken the risky and intriguing adventure of going beyond and piercing the being barrier so as to float in utter nothingness, so to speak, and discover that Nonbeing is only the outer atmosphere of Being, its protective veil. They plunge thus into a darkness enwrapped by darkness, into the Beyond from which there is no return, into that Prelude of Existence in which there is neither Being nor Nonbeing, neither God nor Gods, nor creature of any type; the traveler himself is volatilized, has disappeared. Creation is the act by which God, or whatever name we may choose to express the Ultimate, affirms himself not only vis-à-vis the world, thus created, but also vis-à-vis himself, for he certainly was neither creator before creation nor God for himself. The Vedic seers make the staggering claim of entering into that enclosure where God is not yet God, where God is thus unknown to himself, and, not being creator, is 'nothing'. " Om! Benjamin Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted June 23, 2003 Report Share Posted June 23, 2003 Hi Ben-ji, I do find their glossary in Dancing With Shiva to be helpful on certain doctrinal Hindu terms. But I wouldn't give this site or their teachings my wholesale approbation. For example, here's some old-skool Western esoteric material right on that same site! Read by Satguru Sivaya Subramuniyaswami right from the akashic redcords! The same stuff that Rudolph Steiner and Madame Blavatsky used to talk about - evolution from Lemuria! Below: ========================================================== Lemurian Scrolls $29.85 Enliven your spiritual quest with Lemurian Scrolls, Angelic Prophecies Revealing Human Origins, a lavishly illustrated, clairvoyant revelation of man's untold journey to Earth from the Pleiades millions of years ago, and the struggles faced in ensuing eras as souls matured into their ultimate destiny and Divinity. This latest book by Satguru Sivaya Subramuniyaswami was actually read from the akasha in 1973 and spent 25 years entrusted only to his cloistered monastic order. "The Lemurian Scrolls will enlighten all who read it and it will become a "Source" that will constantly be referred to by serious students, teachers, leaders and metaphysical and spiritual groups (Patricia-Rochelle Diegel, Ph.D)." ========================================================== I'd look for a better authority to put apples and oranges together! Hari OM! --Greg At 10:03 AM 6/23/2003 -0400, Benjamin Root wrote: >Namaste! > >A while back I compared Mahayana 'emptiness' to Advaitin concepts, >and it may have seemed as if I was mixing apples and oranges. >Lately, I have started to explore the excellent website I mentioned >earlier which provides a translation of much Vedic material: > >http://www.himalayanacademy.com/books/ > >It turns out that the Vedas and Upanishads also wrestle with concepts >such as Nonbeing, Nothingness, Void, Emptiness and so forth. In >fact, anyone who tries to penetrate beyond mere conventional concepts >concerning the divine ends up in this no-man's land, where Being and >Nonbeing are two sides of the same coin. This is but an expression >of the ineffability of ultimate truth. > >The following quotation from the translator's commentary may whet >your appetite to explore this website further. It is said that the >Vedas are as little read as they are respected (except for the >Upanishads). Thanks to the internet, we can easily start to change >that, a few pages at a time. > > >Part I, Chapter A - Prelude > >" What is fascinating about the experience of the Vedic seers is not >only that they have dared to explore the outer space of being and >existence, piercing the outskirts of reality, exploring the >boundaries of the universe, describing being and its universal laws, >but that they have also undertaken the risky and intriguing adventure >of going beyond and piercing the being barrier so as to float in >utter nothingness, so to speak, and discover that Nonbeing is only >the outer atmosphere of Being, its protective veil. They plunge thus >into a darkness enwrapped by darkness, into the Beyond from which >there is no return, into that Prelude of Existence in which there is >neither Being nor Nonbeing, neither God nor Gods, nor creature of any >type; the traveler himself is volatilized, has disappeared. Creation >is the act by which God, or whatever name we may choose to express >the Ultimate, affirms himself not only vis-à-vis the world, thus >created, but also vis-à-vis himself, for he certainly was neither >creator before creation nor God for himself. The Vedic seers make the >staggering claim of entering into that enclosure where God is not yet >God, where God is thus unknown to himself, and, not being creator, is >'nothing'. " > >Om! >Benjamin > > >Discussion of Shankara's Advaita Vedanta Philosophy of nonseparablity of Atman and Brahman. >Advaitin List Archives available at: http://www.eScribe.com/culture/advaitin/ >To Post a message send an email to : advaitin >Messages Archived at: advaitin/messages > > > >Your use of is subject to Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted June 23, 2003 Report Share Posted June 23, 2003 Hi Greg, >I do find their glossary in Dancing With Shiva to be helpful >on certain doctrinal Hindu terms. But I wouldn't give this >site or their teachings my wholesale approbation. For example,... You are right; my mistake, I mean to give as URL the translation of the Vedas by Professor Raimon Panikkar: http://www.himalayanacademy.com/books/vedic_experience/VEIndex.html which was ONE of the books in that library. I think we can trust him (what with being a professor and all that). Please do check out these Vedic gems. Yes, I saw that thing about man's origins from the Pleiades via the Lemurians and regretted that I had not pasted the URL more carefully into my previous message. I am a deadly serious PHILOSOPHER, not a New Age flake who once destroyed his brains with psychedelics! Om! Benjamin Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted June 23, 2003 Report Share Posted June 23, 2003 --- Benjamin Root <orion777ben wrote: > > I am a deadly serious PHILOSOPHER, > > Om! > Benjamin > My dear deadly serious PHILOSOPHER, Where do find all these websites that talks about 'nothingness' and beyond! Hay! Bejamin - looking for nothingness - is it not a contradiction in terms. I am looking for the very source of life. Lively serious PHILOSOPHER Hari OM! Sadananda ===== What you have is His gift to you and what you do with what you have is your gift to Him - Swami Chinmayananda. SBC DSL - Now only $29.95 per month! http://sbc. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted June 23, 2003 Report Share Posted June 23, 2003 advaitin, Greg Goode <goode@D...> wrote: > Hi Ben-ji, > > I do find their glossary in Dancing With Shiva to be helpful on certain doctrinal Hindu terms. But I wouldn't give this site or their teachings my wholesale approbation. For example, here's some old-skool Western esoteric material right on that same site! Read by Satguru Sivaya Subramuniyaswami right from the akashic redcords! The same stuff that Rudolph Steiner and Madame Blavatsky used to talk about - evolution from Lemuria! Namaste Benji, If we are to talk of happenings within samasara and illusion, then there is some validity in these theories. I notice G Feuerstein etc give good reviews on some of the books. I trust Feuerstein. With regard to Pleiades, Lemuria etc. Well yes Cayce also confirms the same theory but he also includes Sirius and Orion. India is a remnant of the continent of Mu or Lemuria anyway, so is Madagascar, Australia and the Polynesian Islands. In my own research into Cayce's claim that the totem people of NW N America, where I live where refugees from Mu, I found words almost exactly the same meaning the same thing as in the Polynesian languages etc. Also amongst the Ko San of the Kalahari. If you wish to investigate about descents from Pleiades etc, then go the Bhagavata Purana, and check out the two descents of the Kumaaras. ONS.......Tony. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted June 23, 2003 Report Share Posted June 23, 2003 advaitin, Benjamin Root <orion777ben> wrote: > > > Hi Greg, > > Yes, I saw that thing about man's origins from the Pleiades via the > Lemurians and regretted that I had not pasted the URL more carefully > into my previous message. > > I am a deadly serious PHILOSOPHER, not a New Age flake who once > destroyed his brains with psychedelics! > > Om! > Benjamin Namaste Benji, I'm a new age flake that destroyed my brain with psychedelics, unfortunately I didn't destroy my mind at the same time hahah, Seriously I had my first real experience of creation as a moving mass not still etc etc on psychedelics. I learned a lot about what we call consciousness, the Native American use it as a communion food, mescaline that is. I can actually trace my first 'strong' step on the spiritual path to that first ingestion, for I truly realised what we see is a self made illusion. I wouldn't recommend habitual ingestion though, and meditation is a better route.......ONS....Tony. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted June 23, 2003 Report Share Posted June 23, 2003 Namaste Sadanandaji! You said: >Where do find all these websites that talks about >'nothingness' and beyond! Hay! Bejamin - looking for >nothingness - is it not a contradiction in terms. >I am looking for the very source of life. The website I was referring to was none other than a translation of the Vedas, which I highly recommend: http://www.himalayanacademy.com/books/vedic_experience/VEIndex.html I don't think you will want to argue with that! (Well, I guess we can always call it 'interpretation'.) The point was simply that at the ultimate level, the 'source of life' transcends all categories of the mind, even Being and Nonbeing: >Nasadiya Sukta > >Rig Veda X, 129 > >1. At first was neither Being nor Nonbeing. >There was not air nor yet sky beyond. >What was its wrapping? Where? In whose protection? >Was Water there, unfathomable and deep? > > ... > >4. In the beginning Love arose, >which was the primal germ cell of the mind. >The Seers, searching in their hearts with wisdom, >discovered the connection of Being in Nonbeing. > > Another translation: > >4 Thereafter rose Desire in the beginning, >Desire, the primal seed and germ of Spirit. >Sages who searched with their heart's thought >discovered the existent's kinship in the non-existent. Or, we can even find explicit references to Being proceeding from Nonbeing: >Taittiriya Brahmana II, 2, 9, 1-2 > >In the beginning, to be sure, nothing existed, >neither the heaven nor the earth nor space in between. > >So Nonbeing, having decided to be, became spirit and said: >'Let me be!'' He warmed himself further and from this heating >was born fire. He warmed himself still further >and from this heating was born light. Or again: >Skambha > >Atharva Veda X, 7 > >21. The branch of Nonbeing which is far-extending >men take to be the highest one of all. >They reckon as inferior those who worship >your other branch, the branch of Being. > > ... > >25. Great are the Gods who were born from Nonbeing, >yet men aver this Nonbeing to be >the single limb of the Support, the great Beyond. On the other hand we can also find many statement such as: > >Taittiriya Upanishad II, 1, 6-7 > >6. Nonexistent himself does he become >who thinks that Brahman is Nonbeing. >The one who knows that Brahman is, >he himself is recognized to be. >... > >7. On this there is the following verse: >In the beginning all this was Nonbeing only. >Therefrom, indeed, was Being born. >That Being made itself by it self. And so on ... The point is that in dealing with the Ultimate, concepts such as Nonbeing and Emptiness can be as useful as Being and Totality. In fact, they are two sides of the same coin, as I said earlier. This is because, ultimately the Ultimate transcend all concepts. The ineffability of the Supreme Truth is a well known aspect of Advaita. Consider the following verses from the Vivekachudamani: >It cannot be said to either exist or not exist, >to be divisible or indivisible, >composite or unitary or both. >It is amazing and indescribable. 109 >I am that non-dual God who is eternal, pure, unmoving and imageless, >the support of everything, the illuminator of all objects, manifest in all >forms and all-pervading, and yet empty of everything. 513 > >Deep sleep is the cessation of all forms of awareness, >and the reversion of consciousness to a latent form of the self. >'I knew nothing' is the universal experience. 121 >It is that which experiences everything, >but which nothing else can experience, >which thinks through the intelligence etc., >but which nothing else can think. - 127 And so on... My main point, once again, is that to be true Advaitins (not to mention Hindus or true human beings for that matter), we must be open to all the subtleties of the Transcendent. It does not do to say, 'Oh, Mahayana Buddhists believe in Emptiness, Advaitins believe in Being, therefore we have nothing in common.' On the contrary, we must realize that the Via Negativa (path of negation) and Via Positiva (path of affirmation) are both equally valid and necessary approaches to the Truth, present in all the leading mystical traditions, and both equally limited in their own way. Let us please expand our consciousness beyond stale old formulas and traditions! As for being a deadly serious philosopher, that was part of a joke that must be taken in context. Quoting that out of context makes me look like a deadly serious philosopher! No fair! Om! Benjamin Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted June 23, 2003 Report Share Posted June 23, 2003 Namaste >I'm a new age flake that destroyed my brain with psychedelics, >unfortunately I didn't destroy my mind at the same time hahah, ... I am sure all sorts of marvelous indescribable wonders await us in the beyond. I only get impatient at naive people, who in an excess of enthusiasm, latch onto some cute theory simply because they think it's cute. I do enjoy reading about amazing Near Death Experiences, and I think some of then are true. Regarding extraterrestrials guiding or inseminating the human race... Well, it's not impossible. What I do know is that if you want amazing stuff for entertainment, you need go no further that general relativity or quantum mechanics. Or a simple flower, for that matter... As for drugs, well I don't want to touch that dangerous topic. What I do know is that I would much prefer something I can keep with me at all times and take to the beyond, such as my own Self !!! Om! Benjamin Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted June 23, 2003 Report Share Posted June 23, 2003 --- Benjamin Root <orion777ben wrote: > The website I was referring to was none other than a translation of > the Vedas, which I highly recommend: > > http://www.himalayanacademy.com/books/vedic_experience/VEIndex.html > > I don't think you will want to argue with that! (Well, I guess we > can always call it 'interpretation'.) > > The point was simply that at the ultimate level, the 'source of life' > transcends all categories of the mind, even Being and Nonbeing: Yes I agree. The Scripture have a problem of communicating using words that cannot not be communicated. > > As for being a deadly serious philosopher, that was part of a joke > that must be taken in context. Quoting that out of context makes me > look like a deadly serious philosopher! No fair! Benjamin - do not take that seriously! my comment is only extension of your joke. There was a statement It is only a fool who does not take life seriously. It is only intelligent who seriously takes life seriously. It is only wise who seriously does not take life seriously. Hari OM! Sadananda > > Om! > Benjamin > ===== What you have is His gift to you and what you do with what you have is your gift to Him - Swami Chinmayananda. SBC DSL - Now only $29.95 per month! http://sbc. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted June 24, 2003 Report Share Posted June 24, 2003 --- kuntimaddi sadananda <kuntimaddisada wrote: > Yes I agree. The Scripture have a problem of > communicating using words > that cannot not be communicated. Namaste all, Back from the hills to find 'in-box' full of treats as always. Few random thoughts: Emptiness is fullness which is why it is ineffable...to try to add words is to superimpose an appearance of limitation and the result is subtraction. PurnamidaH Purnamidam....................... If we are to connect with sound then the fullness expands..........call it Brahman if we must seek a name. Having defended Pannikar in a previous dialogue on this site, now I will also want to affirm that although he is an interpreter, and an excellent one at that, for this age, the song of the Vedas is best heard through our own individual study. As we now have the complete Vedas available through the Website we have a glorious opportunity to begin. There are also sites to hear some of the Vedas being chanted for it is through Chhandas (Chant) that the heart/mind may be opened. In order to bring his valid insights into our world Pannikar has to use the written word; the written word being the dominant form for our times...note that we use the word 'scripture' which etymologically is to do with writing rather than 'shruti' which is etymologically based in listening. Take it if you get a chance to hear Pannikar give a lecture, he is then much clearer than he is through the written word. > > There was a statement > > It is only a fool who does not take life > seriously. > It is only intelligent who seriously takes life > seriously. > It is only wise who seriously does not take life > seriously. Lao Tzu says: 'If a man sees sanity in the world, know him to be mad.' If anyone is interested in looking at the present research on NDE's ( Near Death Experiences) and their relevance to advaita then you will find some interesting material in Peter Fenwick's work. eg 'The Truth in the Light' is one book. He is a neuroscientist, widely respected across the world. Although he has an advaitin background he makes little reference to this in his scientific publications. This is so that his Western scientific audience does not dismiss him as a philosopher dealing in unproveables in the empirically dominated Western sciences. Bset wishes Ken Knight SBC DSL - Now only $29.95 per month! http://sbc. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted June 24, 2003 Report Share Posted June 24, 2003 Namaste Kenji! Glad to have you back. >Emptiness is fullness which is why it is >ineffable...to try to add words is to superimpose an >appearance of limitation and the result is subtraction. > >PurnamidaH Purnamidam....................... > >If we are to connect with sound then the fullness >expands..........call it Brahman if we must seek a name. Beautiful! I couldn't have said it better myself, and that's about all I was trying to say. >Having defended Pannikar in a previous dialogue on >this site, now I will also want to affirm that >although he is an interpreter, and an excellent one at >that, for this age, the song of the Vedas is best >heard through our own individual study. Yes, but the website that I mentioned (see below) has not only his commentary but also many translations of actual Vedic text. So this is the place to go for individual study. I have compared his translations to some of the older ones available on the web, such as Ralph T.H. Griffith, and I think his are more accurate (as far as I can tell not being a scholar). Clearer anyway. A lot of people seem to agree. He was a professor at several major universities, so his scholarship is as trustworthy as any. He collaborated with other Sanskrit and Vedantic scholars and spent over 10 years at it. It does seem that this is one of the best available translations, if not the best, and it is FREE on the web at http://www.himalayanacademy.com/books/vedic_experience/VEIndex.html (Yes, I know I've given this URL several times already, but for those who didn't read the previous messages...) Om! Benjamin Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted June 24, 2003 Report Share Posted June 24, 2003 Namaste Sri Benjamin: Even in mathematics, the concepts of zero and infinity can be equated in abstract algebra with certain assumptions. However, zero and infinity have distinct meanings in the broader understanding of mathematical concepts. For some, Vedanta and Buddhism may look alike and even smell alike but still they are not identical. Whenever we make any such comparisons, we need to be careful not to overstay and step over our limits. There is no doubt in my mind that Dr. Panikar is a Sanskrit scholar and had done a reasonably good translation of Rigveda in English. Most of us in the list are not Vedic Scholars and we are not qualified to judge the authencity of his translation. In India, his translation had a mixed review and some were very critical. I do agree that his translation is quite valuable for a layman to get a reasonable perspective of the treasures of Rigveda. I don't know whether Sri Benjamin is aware that the list had conducted several discussions on various aspects of Vedas and they are accessable from the list archives at both the locations. The URL below contains a powerful search engine and it can be used to get all the previous postings on the subject matter of Rigveda or Vedas. http://www.eScribe.com/culture/advaitin/ Also members should look at the list links located at the URL: advaitin/links Here are some titles of threads with dates and poster name on the topic under discussion. I strongly recommend the posts from H.B.Dave which contain very useful information. Let also request our dear Sri Sunder to provide some additional site references with Vedic materials. Warmest regards, Ram Chandran ================================== Re: RigVeda and the Indian Systems of Approaches to the One, H.B.Dave, Tue, 15 Aug 2000 23:15:08 RigVeda and the Systems of Approach to the One, H.B.Dave, Sun, 13 Aug 2000 23:46:40 RigVeda and the Systems of Approach to the One, H.B.Dave, Fri, 11 Aug 2000 20:45:40 Re: RigVeda and the Indian Systems of Approaches to the One, H.B.Dave, Fri, 11 Aug 2000 02:45:39 Re: RigVeda and the Indian Systems of Approaches to the One, H.B.Dave, Fri, 11 Aug 2000 01:32:10 Re: RigVeda and the Indian Systems of Approaches to the One, H.B.Dave, Thu, 10 Aug 2000 23:37:03 Re: RigVeda and the Indian Systems of Approaches to the One, Gummuluru Murthy, Thu, 10 Aug 2000 06:44:18 Re: RigVeda and the Indian Systems of Approaches to the One, K. Sadananda, Thu, 10 Aug 2000 05:50:34 Re: RigVeda and the Indian Systems of Approaches to the One, H.B.Dave, Thu, 10 Aug 2000 05:16:54 Re: RigVeda and the Indian Systems of Approaches to the One, rajuateam, Thu, 10 Aug 2000 04:51:26 Re: RigVeda and the Indian Systems of Approaches to the One, K. Sadananda, Thu, 10 Aug 2000 04:25:15 RigVeda and the Indian Systems of Approaches to the One, H.B.Dave, Thu, 10 Aug 2000 03:53:00 Re: RigVeda and the Indian Systems of Approach to the One, Ram Chandran, Mon, 7 Aug 2000 07:55:28 RigVeda and the Indian Systems of Approach to the One, H.B.Dave, Mon, 7 Aug 2000 00:49:29 Re: Brahman Who?:-), f. maiello, Sun, 6 Aug 2000 07:27:32 RigVeda and the Indian Systems of Approach to the One, H.B.Dave, Tue, 1 Aug 2000 01:54:11 RigVeda and the Indian Systems of Approach to the One, H.B.Dave, Tue, 1 Aug 2000 01:52:52 RigVeda and the Indian Systems of Approach to the One, H.B.Dave, Thu, 27 Jul 2000 02:04:02 RigVeda and the Indian Systems of Approach to the One, H.B.Dave, Thu, 27 Jul 2000 01:56:07 Re: RigVeda and the Indian Systems of Approaches to the One, H.B.Dave, Thu, 20 Jul 2000 23:14:19 RigVeda and The Indian Systems of Approach to the One, H.B.Dave, Thu, 20 Jul 2000 23:01:19 Re: RigVeda and the Indian Systems of Approaches to the One, Gummuluru Murthy, Thu, 20 Jul 2000 09:13:48 RigVeda and the Indian Systems of Approaches to the One, H.B.Dave, Tue, 18 Jul 2000 00:19:35 Re: RigVeda and the Indian Systems of Approaches to th e One, Sunder Hattangadi, Mon, 17 Jul 2000 17:56:42 Re: RigVeda and the Indian Systems of Approaches to th e One, rajuateam, Mon, 17 Jul 2000 17:48:00 Re: RigVeda and the Indian Systems of Approaches to the One, Raju100, Mon, 17 Jul 2000 08:59:40 Re: RigVeda and the Indian Systems of Approaches to th e One, H.B.Dave, Mon, 17 Jul 2000 05:07:42 RE: RigVeda and the Indian Systems of Approaches to th e One, Thommandra, Rama K., Mon, 17 Jul 2000 04:21:58 RigVeda and the Indian Systems of Approaches to the One, H.B.Dave, Mon, 17 Jul 2000 03:46:34 Re: RigVeda and the Indian Systems of Approach to the One, Ram Chandran, Sat, 15 Jul 2000 19:06:54 RigVeda and the Indian Systems of Approach to the One, H.B.Dave, Thu, 13 Jul 2000 04:19:59 RigVeda and the Indian Systems of Approaches to the One, H.B.Dave, Thu, 13 Jul 2000 03:47:28 RE: RigVeda and the Indian Systems of Approach to the One, Madhava K. Turumella, Thu, 13 Jul 2000 02:41:11 RigVeda and the Indian Systems of Approach to the One, H.B.Dave, Thu, 13 Jul 2000 00:56:58 RigVeda and the Indian Systems of Approach to the One, H.B.Dave, Thu, 13 Jul 2000 00:34:53 Re: Welcome to Sri Himanshu Bhalchandra Dave, H.B.Dave, Thu, 13 Jul 2000 Re: RigVeda and the Indian Systems of Approaches to the One, H.B.Dave, Fri, 11 Aug 2000 02:45:39 Re: RigVeda and the Indian Systems of Approaches to the One, Gummuluru Murthy, Thu, 10 Aug 2000 06:44:18 Re: RigVeda and the Indian Systems of Approaches to the One, H.B.Dave, Thu, 10 Aug 2000 05:16:54 00:20:13 Re: Welcome to Sri Himanshu Bhalchandra Dave, Gregory Goode, Wed, 12 Jul 2000 07:58:22 RE: Welcome to Sri Himanshu Bhalchandra Dave, Madhava K. Turumella, Wed, 12 Jul 2000 05:41:08 Welcome to Sri Himanshu Bhalchandra Dave, Ram Chandran, Wed, 12 Jul 2000 04:19:36 Re: Vivekananda on the Vedas (part 47), BTA SAGAR, Thu, 26 Apr 2001 06:37:40 Vivekananda on the Vedas (part 47), Vivekananda Centre, Thu, 26 Apr 2001 04:07:51 Article sent from The Hindu on indiaserver.com, thehindu, Mon, 23 Apr 2001 18:52:22 Re: Key teachings of Scriptures, Raghava Kaluri, Tue, 17 Apr 2001 11:44:42 Key teachings of Scriptures, Vivekananda Centre, Tue, 17 Apr 2001 11:19:45 Vivekananda on the Vedas (part 45), Vivekananda Centre, Wed, 11 Apr 2001 02:47:31 Re: Re: Vegetarianism in the Vedas, Siddhartha Krishna, Mon, 9 Apr 2001 07:53:48 Re: Vegetarianism in the Vedas, warankk, Sat, 7 Apr 2001 23:24:59 Shankara's philosophy for the World!, Siddhartha Krishna, Fri, 6 Apr 2001 23:21:50 re: how can Krishna be proved as an avatara, Siddhartha Krishna, Fri, 6 Apr 2001 13:48:05 Spiritual Power, Siddhartha Krishna, Thu, 5 Apr 2001 05:34:52 Re: Again about Vedism, Siddhartha Krishna, Wed, 4 Apr 2001 00:16:18 please don't miss this artical about the Vedas, Please!, Siddhartha Krishna, Wed, 4 Apr 2001 00:07:46 Vagitarianism in the Vedas, Siddhartha Krishna, Wed, 4 Apr 2001 00:06:50 Re: Welcome our New Member Sri Sharath Sankar from Chennai, India, Siddhartha Krishna, Wed, 4 Apr 2001 00:05:02 Welcome our New Member Sri Sharath Sankar from Chennai, India, advaitins moderators, Mon, 2 Apr 2001 04:29:42 Indra and Vedanta, Siddhartha Krishna, Sun, 1 Apr 2001 12:13:58 Again about Vedism, Siddhartha Krishna, Sun, 1 Apr 2001 12:13:48 Re: Re: some thing interesting about Vedism, Siddhartha Krishna, Sun, 1 Apr 2001 12:13:21 Re: Vedism, warankk, Sun, 1 Apr 2001 07:54:29 RE: How were Vedas seen by our Great Seers, Dennis Waite, Sun, 1 Apr 2001 05:14:13 Vegetarianism in the Vedas, Siddhartha Krishna, Fri, 30 Mar 2001 17:43:20 Vedas and Advaita Vedanta, Siddhartha Krishna, Fri, 30 Mar 2001 17:43:12 How were Vedas seen by our Great Seers, Siddhartha Krishna, Fri, 30 Mar 2001 17:42:51 Re: Re: Hi tech interpretations of Vedas, R. Viswanathan, Fri, 22 Sep 2000 17:34:11 Re: Hi tech interpretations of Vedas, milliondollarbet, Thu, 21 Sep 2000 14:21:44 RE: Re: Hi tech interpretations of Vedas, Ram Chandran, Thu, 21 Sep 2000 08:51:04 RE: Re: Hi tech interpretations of Vedas, Madhava K. Turumella, Thu, 21 Sep 2000 01:14:36 Vivekananda on the Vedas, Vivekananda Centre, Wed, 20 Sep 2000 13:11:41 Re: Hi tech interpretations of Vedas, milliondollarbet, Wed, 20 Sep 2000 09:20:27 Re: Hi tech interpretations of Vedas, milliondollarbet, Wed, 20 Sep 2000 08:54:49 RE: Hi tech interpretations of Vedas, Ram Chandran, Wed, 20 Sep 2000 05:37:20 advaitin, Benjamin Root <orion777ben> wrote: Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.