Guest guest Posted July 18, 2003 Report Share Posted July 18, 2003 Namaste Sri Benjamin: Mathematically speaking, we all agree that at the point of interaction of the two straight lines (Mahayana philosophy and Shankara's advaita philsophy)they are identical! But just having one common intersection will not make two straight lines to be equal. Please contemplate on what Sri Sadananda had stated in his reply before you reassert your speculations. The two straight lines will be mathematically identical if we can establish two common points between them and this is elementary geometry. As Sadaji correctly stated that one need to establish the consistency and validity of these philosophies at the Paramarthika level and at the vyavahara level. Shankara beautifully distinguishes between these two states of reality and this makes Advaita philosophy quite distinct from nonvedantic non-dual philosophies and other pluralistic philosophies. Logically speaking, advaita is a non-dual philosopy but all non-dual philosophies are not necessarily advaita! As I have stated in my previous posts, the context of advaita philosophy is the entire spectrum of Sanatana Dharam of Vedic religion and culture. I do like your enthuiasm and your spirit of sharing your thoughts with the universal population but I beg to differ from your key assertions. Warmest regards, Ram Chandran advaitin, Benjamin Root <orion777ben> wrote: > > Namaste > > I believe that I have a potent weapon of mass destruction to refute > all those who claim that Advaita (or Shankara in particular) is NOT > idealistic, according to my uncompromising discussion of Subjective > Idealism presented in the Introduction of Message 7. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.