Guest guest Posted August 25, 2003 Report Share Posted August 25, 2003 Namaste. Recall that the entire contents of the Digest are from the Paramacharya’s ideas and words, except for my English rendering. Wherever he uses specific English words himself, I have drawn the attention of the reader to that fact. FOR NEW READERS of this series, it may be worthwhile to go back to the Introduction about the objective of this Digest and the Note on the Organization (both at advaitin Message No.18425; message no.5273; advaita-L message No.14046; Sadhana_shakti message no.334). V. Krishnamurthy A Digest of Paramacharya’s Discourses on Soundaryalahari - 12 I was saying that our Acharya , had included ideas from the non-advaita schools also. These ideas as well as those of advaita had their origin long before their chief proponents propagated them formally as a siddhanta. So Soundarya lahari being a work of bhakti leaning a little on the side of the Shakta schools, has these ideas also in it. It talks about the ‘spandanam’ of brahma-Shakti and praises, in superlative terms, the Shakti that caused it. But there is no such idea of ‘spandanam’ in the advaita shAstra of Adi Sankara. The Brahman of advaita is motionless, and changeless. This immutable Brahman was, according to advaita, neither moved from outside nor perturbed from the inside. The multiple presentations that resulted through the Creation process was just due to mAyA, which, with the base (adhAra) of Brahman, somehow initiated it. It is only an appearance according to advaita and that is why mAyA is criticised and recommended to be negated. Our Atman is nothing but that very nirguNa Brahman. If we do not know it, it is because mAyA has done its work of hiding the Reality from us. But it is that very same mAyA that the Soundaryalahari now has taken to the skies and praised as Shakti, as a power greater than even the Triad of Brahma, Vishnu and Shiva. Though it does not use the word ‘mAyA’ here, it uses the word ‘Shakti’ and from the very fact that Shakti is the root cause for creation of the universe, it is clear it must be the same as the mAyA of advaita. In advaita the nirguNa Brahman is unrelated to the saguNa Brahman which produces and monitors the whole universe by mAyA Shakti. For, nirguNa Brahman just is; it can never be related to or predicated with anything. The miraculous way in which mAyA exhibits that Brahman, as Brahman with name and form and all the associated multiplicity, is analogous to the way we see in a dimly lit twilight the appearance of a snake in a rope. Clearly there is no relationship between the appearing snake and the rope which is the support for the appearance. However, the Shaktam that the Acharya projects to us has a mAyA Shakti which is not unrelated to Brahman. There is no brahma-Shakti talked about in advaita. Here in ShAktam, it is brahma-Shakti that is important. That is the ambaal. One of her aspects is the magic wand of mAyA. Not only that. She is Herself the jnAna-Shakti (the power of cognitive self-recognition) which is diametrically opposite to mAyA; and further it is the icchA Shakti (the power of wilful self-emanation) and kriyA Shakti (the power of creative act) also. She stands inseparable from the Shivam which is the nirguNa Brahman of ShAktam which, however, is a shade different from the nirguNa Brahman of advaita. The identity of Shiva and Shakti is important here. Identity means total oneness. It is this Shivam that is made to be the object of spandanam, and then coupled with Him She does the creation and all further processes. Since She is the ‘Energy’ or ‘Power’ of Shivam, it is clear that any action She undertakes cannot but have a relationship with that Shivam. When Shakti, the ambaal, grants moksha to the jIva, the jIva attains the changeless nirguNa state, say the Shakta works like the ShrI-vidyA. Even then that nirguNa state has also the Shakti in it!. It is said that Shakti itself revels in enjoyment of bliss in its own creation of the universe of duality. But it is not even right to say that the play of creation is for enjoyment. Because if you accept this, it would mean that when there is no creation, Shakti is without that bliss! So instead of saying that She indulges in Creation for enjoyment of bliss, we should rather say that it is the very Bliss that is part of Her that exhibits itself as the creation. Let me now explain the subtle difference between the mAyA of advaita and the different Shaktis of the Shaiva and ShAkta schools. Starting from the Shivam-Brahman, they talk of 36 principles. The first five are called pure ‘mAyA’ and the latter 31 belong to the category of impure ‘mAyA. Shivam is the first. Next there come three different shaktis, namely, cit-shakti, jnAna-shakti, vidyA-shakti. These correspond to three different dimensions of cit. When it pertains to the non-dual shiva-shakti, it is cit. When it pertains to the seed-knowledge of duality for the purpose of creation it is called jnAna. In the next stage it is aware both of its non-dual state and its potential for the sprouting out into multiplicity, and then it is called (pure) vidyA. After these three, come the next, now the fifth in order, namely the kriyA shakti which is the executing part. Only thereafter, starting from the sixth principle, it is mAyA and all its evolutes. All this importance given to Shakti in the Shaiva and Shakta schools is avoided in advaita, with all the evoluted appearances from Brahman being branded as the effect of mAyA and we being asked to discredit them. But even in the way the Shaiva and Shakta schools go, the question can be asked; Somehow or other, it is the hierarchy of these Shaktis that bind us to this samsAra. Why then praise that Shakti and worship it with hymns like Soundaryalahari? This is the key question. The answer is, mAyA Shakti even in the Shakta schools does not end there. It is also the jnAna Shakti as we saw above. And the bottomline of it all is that this same Shakti as jnAna Shakti graces us with Knowledge and Enlightenment in the end. And in the meantime She shows Infinite Love towards us in order to take us back into her fold. That is the greatest anugraha that She does for us. And that is why we worship Her and pray to Her for Release. (To be continued). PraNAms to all advaitins and Devotees of Mother Goddess. profvk ===== Prof. V. Krishnamurthy My website on Science and Spirituality is http://www.geocities.com/profvk/ You can access my book on Gems from the Ocean of Hindu Thought Vision and Practice, and my father R. Visvanatha Sastri's manuscripts from the site. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.