Guest guest Posted October 1, 2003 Report Share Posted October 1, 2003 Hello Benjamin, I'll make this not too long. You mention "streams of consciousness" (more a Buddhist idea than an advaitin one) and say they can conceivably be individuated as various dream bodies. Sure, this avoids positing conventionally physical objects like teacups and cars. But not all objects are that gross. Objects occur at various levels of subtlety. The Taittiriya Upanishad breaks down the world of phenomenality into 5 levels, and speaks of the five koshas (annamaya, pranamaya, manomaya, vijnanamaya, anandamaya). All objects and all experiences fall within one of these levels of subtlety. All of these objects and experiences arise to the seer. The community of dreamers is a set of subtle objects. You ask why your experiences aren't mine and vice versa. The very foundations of this question are based on the subject/object scheme. Also based upon the notion that that awareness is limited to a person/viewpoint/locale/dream body. If you didn't conceive of subjecthood as limited to a particular locale or dream body, then the question would never arise. Even if you stick to your model and examine what is given in "Ben's experience," you say no subject/object dichotomy is apparent. So where's the evidence for even *one* stream of consciousness, much less a multiplicity of them? Harih Om! --Greg Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.