Guest guest Posted November 3, 2003 Report Share Posted November 3, 2003 Namaste Sri Ananda, I am so glad to hear that you and your guru Atmananda are the kind of dangerous 'radicals' who are dear to my heart. Not that you disrespect tradition, but you realize that it is like the training wheels one sometimes sees on children's bicycles. Modern educated rationalistic minds can no longer tolerate this, and unless you wish us all to become atheists, you had better let us try our hand at the direct path, even if we do not at first succeed. Indeed, it was this emphasis on direct realization which attracted me to the Indian religions in the first place, specifically Advaita and Buddhism and other yogic paths. Yoga in the broadest sense is nothing but direct realization. The instruments to this goal may vary, but the proof of the pudding is always in the eating ... right now, in this very life, provided sincerity and commitment are sufficiently intense. The inquiring mind cannot help but ask questions such as: Does God exist? How can I escape suffering and attain permanent happiness? What is my true nature? Why am I here? Etc. All answers based on an invisible God and heaven hidden away beyond the blackest reaches of outer space will always remain unsatisfactory to those with inquiring minds and a measure of impatience. The sages of the Upanishads also posed these questions, and came up with a brilliant solution: That which we seek is already hidden in us, because it is us. There is nothing but Consciousness, which is our very nature. Only this consciousness can manifest in varying degrees of purity, depending on our mental conditioning. The unravelling of this mental conditioning is what it is all about. This basic goal unites Advaitins, Buddhists, Taoists, and many others. Tradition and dogma, on the other hand, are concerned with replacing one structure of mental conditioning with a less pernicious structure. This will never satisfy those who can see through all structures. There is so much suffering in this world, but the great and tragic irony is that it is all based on clinging to a finite and imperfect view of what we truly are. Any distinction in the mind between 'self' and 'other' can only imprison consciousness and prevent it from manifesting its infinite potential. Infinity, by its very definition, is the lack of limits, of distinctions, of barriers. The ego, by its very definition, is a fence. Conflict is the inevitable outcome. I know that it is very difficult to give it up, but at least I can benefit from understanding the problem and preparing myself as much as possible. Also, it is clear that we ARE what we THINK, that conceptual thought powerfully affects the manifestation of consciousness. How could this be otherwise? Thought channels the flow of consciousness as a river bed channels the water. Our thinking is what we *believe*, and this belief-structure pervades the recesses of our inner being and thoroughly conditions the energy of consciousness. It is because beliefs are so internal and intimate that people cling to them so desperately. This is why religion causes so much violence in the world, because we take offense when we feel challenged in the core of our being, or what we take to be this core. The solution is to abandon all beliefs and other contrived psychological and emotional structures and simply allow consciousness to shine in its own light, to reveal its true nature as pure luminosity, as infinite being, as the only reality, without limits and arbitrary restrictions. All paths converge on this goal, where the naked essence of consciousness simply manifests in utter purity. Dogma and beliefs are irrelevant in the light of reality. And it makes sense, too! We are not talking about self-induced brain damage. I would only add that at this level, the 'direct' and 'cosmological' paths are seen to be the same. If we realize our true self as consciousness, then we directly perceive that the entire 'universe' is nothing but that. It is only when we make a false distinction between subject and object, or otherwise violate the intrinsic purity and homogeneity of consciousness, that such issues even arise in the first place. Yes, this may be nothing but fine words, but they've gotten me a bit energized, as have yours! A kind of meditation. Another step on the path... Hari Om! Benjamin P.S. I always hated going to church and trying to say things like, 'God you're so great and I'm so miserable and worthless'. My heart was never in it. I never believed it. I instinctively recoiled from it. It offended my inner sense of dignity as well as my reason. Now I know why. God, insofar as he exists, never wants us to be any kind of slave. What an abhorrent notion, contrary to any humanistic sense of decency! However, we must always be scrupulously honest and realize the truth about ourselves, or we will become our own slaves! And I wouldn't mind becoming 'nothing' if that means dissolving into infinity, like salt in the ocean. Now that DOES make sense. Not to be confused with slavery. Also, the more benign forms of bhakti do not appeal to me either. How can one love the 'invisible other'? Seems like sentimentality to me. I guess I just can't stop talking... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.