Guest guest Posted December 27, 2003 Report Share Posted December 27, 2003 Dear Ananda, I cannot help but admire the heroic length and flawless prose of your responses. Fortunately, I know that you enjoy writing, or I would feel guilty indeed. >Here, I would say that you are not being 'prosaic' enough, if by >'prosaic' one means 'dispassionately analytical and skeptical'. I love the graceful way that you use jiu-jitsu to gently deflect me instead of karate to attack me head on. You did this before, when you said I was not 'idealistic' enough, instead of flatly contradicting me on idealism. (For those who do not know, jiu-jitsu is a less violent form of the martial arts, which aims to deflect your opponent's force so he stumbles, whereas the more common and violent martial arts such a karate try to kick the other guy's head off. I think that we should follow Ananda's example and adopt the gentle approach here! :-) ) Basically, I agree with what you then said, namely, that Advaita and nondualism in general seek to overcome ANY concept of the mind. As you may have noticed, I have lately become quite enthusiastic about the Yoga Vasistha, which states unequivocally that the source of all dualism, ignorance and suffering is the mind, which must be utterly transcended. Also, it clearly states that both perceptions and conceptions arise from the mind, which is interesting to those of us who tend to distinguish sharply between sense-perceptions and thoughts. Really, both are manifestations of the mind. Without a doubt, the essence of liberation and enlightenment is to somehow free ourselves from the bondage of the mind. Many, many scriptures from both the Advaitin and Buddhist traditions say this. (A prime example of the latter is almost anything from the Zen tradition, which constantly speaks of 'no-mind'.) This means freeing ourselves form all beliefs, presuppositions, partiality, discriminations, preferences, aversions, and so forth. In a word, from all conceptualization and objectification. So to the extent that 'idealism' is still some kind of a mental construction, i.e. some kind of a philosophy, you are absolutely right that it is only tentative. I was merely using 'idealism' and 'monistic idealism' as convenient labels for 'consciousness only', to distinguish it from such philosophical views as materialism. But if even this notion retains some trace of conceptualization, then it must be transcended and dissolved. Without a doubt this is the crux of Advaita and of nondual traditions in general. And mind is inseparable from ego... In the midst of all this high-flying talk, let me remind readers of what a startling assertion Advaita makes. It says that if we simply silence the discerning, discriminating, conceptualizing and objectifying mind, then all suffering will vanish, to be replaced by the purest bliss of infinite consciousness. We often tend to forget this in the midst of pedantic discussions. This is truly a most remarkable claim, and one that should be 'scientifically verifiable' in the strictest sense of the term. This also means that we should consider the mind as some kind of hideous cosmic cobra, more awesome and frightening that anything in Hindu mythology. Of course, this leads us right back to snake and rope! However, we must still be prepared to answer those 'common-sense' skeptics who say that abandoning the mind is tantamount to turning into an idiot or a vegetable. I know that the mind can still function appropriately as a mere tool, even while in the samadhi state. My swamiji assures me that a jivanmukta can still do mathematics; in fact, his mathematics will be much better. So trying to understand how to use mind as a mere tool while remaining free from all its presuppositions and partiality is perhaps an interesting sadhana in its own right! Can ProfVK, a professional mathematician, enlighten us? :-) Your remarks on deep sleep are also quite satisfactory to me. That state is always present though obscured by the mind. The issue of remembering deep sleep is irrelevant, since memory is only of the mind. Yes, this answer will do very well. My, we are making progress indeed! Thank you. Oh, and I almost forgot, I love your quotes from Tennyson and other poets. I am glad that you can appreciate what is good in English culture, instead of simply rejecting everything associated with the hated imperialists. But then, you are Advaitin, without gripes or prejudices... The Muslims also have beautiful poetry. Hari Om! Benjamin Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted December 27, 2003 Report Share Posted December 27, 2003 benjamin guru ji, yes, the muslims too have beautiful poetry . you know and i know. it is they who dont know that. a.v.krshnan. ______________________ Messenger - Communicate instantly..."Ping" your friends today! Download Messenger Now http://uk.messenger./download/index.html Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.