Guest guest Posted February 20, 2004 Report Share Posted February 20, 2004 Namaste Nirmalaji, >Comment: The manifested world of plurality cannot exist >without the essence of consciousness. So, the 'isness' or >the essence in each form the Prakriti creates is real and >there is the non separation of Purush and Prakriti. In the >changing universe of plurality cannot even exist without >the presence of substratum of the Self and that is the >reality in Prakriti The appearance of your favorite word 'isness' suggests to me that this is your thought. I like the idea of 'isness' very much provided one does not distinguish between isness and consciousness. Note that for many people, the objects have their being or 'isness' out there distinct from the consciousness. It seems that the whole point of what you quoted today is to show that this apparent separation is false. This is surely Advaita. Also, it is interesting to see the Buddhist concept of 'voidness' appearing here. After all, what is pure consciousness but a voidness? It is surely not a 'thing'. Yet it manifests itself as the illusory world of objects or Shakti. This may seem a paradox at the conceptual level, at least until one thinks of the dream analogy. I wonder if Jnaneshwara uses the dream analogy. We will see... But let us remember that what you quoted also says that Shiva transcends the voidness. I interpret this to mean that we must not start to think of the very voidness or consciousness as a thing. Even the pure consciousness must dissolve into ... pure consciousness! Anyhow, my point is that I like 'isness' very much as long as there is no difference between isness and consciousness. Hari Om! Benjamin Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted February 24, 2004 Report Share Posted February 24, 2004 In the following five verses the indivisible unity and oneness of Siva and Sakti are emphasized by various illustrations. Ovi55 Just see ,both the (object )and the illumination abide in the sun;does the sun loose his oneness? Ovi 56 The moonlight is spread over the fat belly of the moon;(the two are not differeent).When the lamp is caught in it,s light,does it cause any deficiency in it,s light? Ovi57 When the luster of a pearl sticks on to it,it adds distinct fineness to it. Ovi58 Is Pranav(OM) considered as dissected because it is a triad of three syllables(a,u,m) ?Does the letter `u| ,stand split up because it is formed by three strokes? Ovi59 Why should not the water enjoy the fragrance of the flower-buds in the form of ripples if it(smelling)in no way affects it,s capital(the totality of water)but earns profit of gracefullness Note:In one way,it is businesslike approach.The underlying idea is that there is no harm in contonuing any business if there is no loss of capital but there is profit also. Ovi 60 Therefore,without making any distinction between Bhutesh and Bhavani(Siva and Sakti) i proceed to bow to them thus--- Ovi61 When the mirror is put aside,the reflection enters it,s object;when the air is still,ripples get drowened(in water) Ovi 62 Or else,with the departure of sleep one immediately realises his own self;in that way discarding my power of discrimination i bowed tothe Goddes and the God. Note:A thing appears in two different forms because ther is always a third i.e. a change----agent(upadhi).The face and it,s image in a mirror are two because of the presence of a mirror.Similarly water and ripples are two because there is the wind.In such circumstances,the removal of an agent serves to restore the oneness of the object.Here it is the discriminating faculty of man which has caused the dual appearence of the supreme.Hence jnanadeva discarded that descriminating intellect and realised the Absolute.This verse explains how the state of natural existance(sahajavastha)is secured in siddha practices. When one gets up from sleep and becomes wakeful he has to pass through an intermediate state(dehabhana) of gaining body consciousness.In that state ,there lingers on a faint memory of sleep which is just over and there is a dim awareness of being waken up.So to come to the natural stste of waking, one has to give up sleep as well as the intermediate state.Similarly,to obtain the natural state (sahajavastha)the sleep state that`i am the body,i posess this and that,etc.,has to dissappear first.Then the intermediary state that `i am Siva,etc,and the subtle form must go.Having passed through these two stages ,when one enters the world to carry on his worldly activities, that stats is called(sahajavastha). In this state distinction betweenSiva and sakti is also not noticed.Jnanadeva says,`by forgetting the separate existance of Siva and sakti and getting merged in their union,I offered my salutations, Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.