advaitin Why should things exist?

[Guest guest]

Namaste Gregji,

 

Chittaranjanji is not a professional philosopher, he is a complete

amateur. :-)

 

I don't know about Michaelji, but even if he is not a professional

philosopher, I think he (as well as others) may have cause to be

offended by my remarks if he has great respect for any philosopher

belonging to recent times.

 

With regards,

Chittaranjan

 

 

advaitin, Gregory Goode <goode@D...> wrote:

> Is Michaelji a professional philosopher? Is Chittaranjanji?

>

> --Greg (almost, but not quite)

>

> On 2/29/04 03:09 am "Chittaranjan Naik" (chittaranjan_naik)

wrote:

> Namaste Michaelji,

>

> I believe I owe you an apology. While I have been saying that one

> should avoid imposing one's own set of values on the subject of

> study, I have been guilty of this same offense. I believe that

> characterising the nineteen century as "the twilight of European

> philosophy" is rather value-laden and is sufficient cause to hurt

the

> modern philosopher. I am sorry if I have said anything to hurt your

> sensibilities.

>

> With regards,

> Chittaranjan

>

>

>

>

>

> Discussion of Shankara's Advaita Vedanta Philosophy of

nonseparablity of Atman and Brahman.

> Advaitin List Archives available at: <a

href="http://www.eScribe.com/culture/advaitin/"

target="NewWin">http://www.eScribe.com/culture/advaitin/</a>

> To Post a message send an email to : advaitin

> Messages Archived at: <a

href="advaitin/messages"

target="NewWin">advaitin/messages</a>

>

>

> Links