Jump to content
IndiaDivine.org

RE: Subject: Types of pleasure

Rate this topic


Guest guest

Recommended Posts

Guest guest

Hi Benjamin,

 

I did note your message when originally posted. I felt I ought to respond to

say that your ordering of the senses, though intuitively right perhaps for

most of us, is not the order suggested by saMkhya at least. They place

hearing at the top of the chain, ahead of sight.

 

The reason I didn't respond is fivefold! Firstly, I am not actually certain

that the origin is saMkhya. It was very much propagated by the school I

attended (SES) and they purported to teach advaita. But I don't recall

having come across this in advaita so I assumed it was saMkhya. Secondly, I

can't remember the arguments as to why it was the most subtle, 'spiritual'

and important sense. Thirdly, I never really felt happy with the

assignment - I, like you, would have tended to place sight at the top.

Fourthly, I was hoping that someone else, who was more in touch with the

truth of the matter, would respond! And, finally as you noted, we all became

embroiled in the SOC discussion. Apologies!

 

Can anyone else help? I rather suspect this is up Sri Ananda's street,

actually.

 

Best wishes,

 

Dennis

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest guest

advaitin, "Dennis Waite" <dwaite@a...> wrote:

> Hi Benjamin,

>

> I did note your message when originally posted. I felt I ought to

respond to

> say that your ordering of the senses, though intuitively right

perhaps for

> most of us, is not the order suggested by saMkhya at least. They

place

> hearing at the top of the chain, ahead of sight.

 

Namaste,

 

This subject is covered in 'Panchikarana', a work attributed to

Shankara, and a commentary (Vartika) on it by his disciple Sureshvara.

 

The works Atmabodha and Tattvabodha also discuss this.

 

The 'evolution' from subtle to gross elements is given in the

order - Space -> Air -> Light -> Water -> Earth.

 

It would appear that this is more a teaching device for negating

the 'objects', and not something to be accepted as 'Real'.

{AtmA kaH ? - AtmA satyaM tadanyatsarvaM mithyeti || Tattvabodha]

 

For more details, these sites are useful:

 

http://www.geocities.com/advaitavedant/index.htm

 

 

http://www.hinduism.co.za/three.htm#The%20Five%20Great%20Elements

 

http://talatiam.home.netcom.com/tattva/tattva.htm

 

http://www.geocities.com/advaitavedant/panchikaranam.htm

 

While searching, came across an interesting thread - Aurobindo

and Shastras :

 

advaitin/message/3029

 

 

Regards,

 

Sunder

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
×
  • Create New...