Guest guest Posted March 27, 2004 Report Share Posted March 27, 2004 Final search writes... "You become what you meditate. If you meditate as a deity, you will become that. If you meditate as a worm, you become that. " Thanx for introducing the keeta-bhramara nyaya (caterpillar- butterfly logic)," as you contemplate, so you shall be." This thumb rule applies very much to any object of continuous concentration, be it a mantra-deity, or a butterfly as in the case of a caterpillar inside a pupa. One day, a wandering sadhu came upon a boy herding buffaloes. He was hungry, and the boy readily obliged him with some milk. After drinking to his satisfaction, the sadhu began to feel generous, and asked the herdsman, 'What would you like? I'm feeling fine, I'll give it to you.' The boy laughed and said,'I really don't need anything. I do nothing all day long but herd my buffaloes, and am fully satisfied with that. Besides, sadhu-maharaj, you came to me as a beggar and I gave you alms. How can I expect anything from you in return? I am the giver, not you.' The sadhu was taken aback by the reply, and realised that this was no ordinary buffalo-herd. But still feeling expansive he asked, 'What is it that you love most in the world? ' 'Why, this buffalo', the boy replied innocently, 'the one whose milk you just drank. She is the largest I have, she gives me 10 gallons of milk everyday, she is broad and string, so loving and beautiful, I love her best of all.' 'All right', said the sadhu, 'please do one thing. Go sit in that cave and imagine that you are this buffalo. Think of her, keep her picture in mind, completely self identify with her, become her ! As you sit doing all this, repeat to yourself "Bhaisoham, bhaisoham"(I am a buffalo, I am a buffalo). Don't worry about a thing, I'll look after your buffaloes.' The herdsman did exactly as the sadhu said, and after 3 days when the sadhu entered the cave, he found the boy sitting motionless with his eyes closed, repeating, "Bhaisoham, bhaisoham". The sadhu said, 'So young man, how have you progressed? Come out now.' Out came the reply,'Don't call me a young-man! I am a buffalo. Can't you see that? Look at my broad back! How can I leave this small cave? My horns are too broad to go thru the enterance. Now don't be foolish; go away and leave me alone or I'll gore you and toss you out with these beautiful horns of mine.' But the sadhu persisted and said, 'Try to remember my boy, I told you to sit and do this. Now, instead of repeating, "I am a buffalo", start to identify with Shiva and repeat "Shivoham, Shivoham"(I am Shiva, I am Shiva).' The herdsman did that, and in about fifteen minutes he was in a deep trance(samadhi). He realized his goal: The Universal Soul in the form of Lord Shiva. The sadhu was astonished. Tears came to his eyes and he said to himself, 'This fellow sits only three and a half days and achieves and I have wandered around practising without success for so many years.' Then he had to take that buffalo herd as his guru, and finally the sadhu also realized. ********************************************************************** This is what happened with Sri Ramakrishna Paramhamsa. What took his guru thirty years to achieve, shri Ramakrishna achieved in a few days." This proves that time is not the critereon; if the desire is strong enough the result must occur without delay. All has to be forgotten except the name and form of the deity. Hence it is important to choose a mantra and deity to which has very strong inherent affinity for, the Guru can be very helpful here as he can look behind the make believe world of our imaginations. Both name and form are essential for worship. One part of the mind takes the shape of an object; that is form. Another part of the mind identifies and distinguishes it; that is name. To go directly to the highest form of samadhi is almost impossible. Even shri Ramakrishna had to worship Mother Bhavatarini for many years before his consciousness became one-pointed enough to achieve The Formless, but may be that was just Leela for all of us ignorants (posted in my group braHman by a dear friend of mine) ! ********************************************************************** let me leave you all with this favorite verse from Nirvana shatakam by our beloved Adi Shankara Bhagvadapada ... Na punyam na paapam na saukhyam na dookham Na mantrau na teertham na Veda , na Yagnah Aham bhojanam naiva bhojyam na bhokta Chidanandaroopah Sivoham Sivoham. I have neither virtue nor vice; nor pleasure nor pain; nor the sacred chants nor pilgrimage; nor the scriptures nor the sacrificial rituals.I am neither the act of enjoying,nor the enjoyable object nor the enjoyer. I AM pure Knoeledge & Bliss, I AM SIVA, the auspiciouness itself. LOVE AND BLESSINGS ON THIS AUSPICIOUS DAY OF DURGASHTAMI! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted March 28, 2004 Report Share Posted March 28, 2004 Namaste Adi Ma. I look at it this way. When I look at a mountain, I am the mountain because then, at the point of that looking, I am not aware of myself, the looker, or anything else for that matter. This applies to all my sensory perceptions and mental vrittis. I am aware of what I falsely consider myself to be - like my roles, deficiencies, parts of the body (not the total body as that is only a thought!) - only for a small fraction of my whole life-time. Yet, I am plagued by my overwhelming 'I' ness distressingly all throughout when I actually am a self-evidence that is formlessness! Knowing that I am everything I 'see' is advaitic freedom. That I believe is the anubhUti of our blessed young Balaji. My overburdening "I"-ness conceals my freedom of being everything. Thus, in the deluded belief that I am 'a something', I retire to the caves to meditate and be 'something else'. PraNAms. Madathil Nair ____________________ advaitin, "adi_shakthi16" <adi_shakthi16> wrote: > > Thanx for introducing the keeta-bhramara nyaya (caterpillar- > butterfly logic)," as you contemplate, so you shall be." Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted March 28, 2004 Report Share Posted March 28, 2004 Namaste dadiji, While I must say, it was a nice story, that represented the realization of the Absolute by Sri Ramakrishna with the help of Sri. Tota Puri, there is a slight misrepresentation in the story, though it is really beautiful: Sri Ramakrishna attained to the state of Nirvikalpa samadhi not like what the boy attained, which was not nirvikalpa samadhi. 1. There is a further question I wish to ask. Kindly enlighten me. The identification of oneself with Shiva/any deity or mantra may make sense to one who knows how to identify oneself in the first place. How do we identify ourselves with Shiva? Identification of oneself is enough. Why with someone or something else? The former itself is difficult, how do you do the latter? 2. How does identification of oneself with Shiva lead to cessation of all sorrow? So what if I am Shiva? What is Shiva? If we try to identify oneself with the Shiva keeping in mind the definition of Shiva from Shankara's poetry that dadiji quoted, we would be in vain trying to acheive nirvikalpa samadhi. Let us try to understand what it means when you are told to do 'upasana', for all the above descriptions were gross misrepresentations of upasana. (No offense to anyone please.) The objective of upasana is to develop sattva gunas in a person, and make him slowly develop the four qualities of a yogin: Maittree, mudita, karuna, upeksha. These can be developed through selfless service (not just to the Lord, but to everything in the Universe). It is a good beginning, but not the end. (Read Yogavasistha Samhita, Ch.1 which reiterates this.) The problem is, we cannot be truly selfless, unless we are completely enlightened. But we cannot begin to become enlightened, without being selfless. This is a viscious cycle. The key is to develop the quality day by day. A businessman used to give dana everyday. Soon he became penniless. But he still wanted to give things to others. What did he do? He picked a handful of soil from the fertile land in the barren backyard and placed it under a tree in his frontyard, so that the tree may grow well and tired travellers may take rest under its shade. However, how effective is it going to be? The process is very slow, though the best beginning. To the one initiated (one who might have done some such thing in the previous birth), this would not help. One has to develop tranquility of the mind (Yogavasishtha again, I don't remember the chapter.) In fact it must be developed first, according to Yogavasishtha (which is itself for the initiated, so for the uninitiated, selfless service is the minimal starting point) Not that the one initiated can stop all selfless service, but that he should understand the meaning and the purpose of his service. Tranquility of the mind helps in this. When his mind begins to become calm, he becomes like the businessman who just laid a handful of soil everyday. The value of the thing being given holds no relevance, the cleanliness of the mind (cetana) is what matters. Then when the mind gets slowly cleared, it is time to start seeing some truths. This is the point at which the Upanishads proclaim 'Athato Brahma Jijnasa' We begin by trying to observe the nature of our bondage - ignorance. (Till now the sadhak does not even know he is in ignorance) He first comes to know that there is sorrow, and the cause of this sorrow is ignorance. It is then only that he proceeds toward the higher truths. Noone can realize the ultimate truth by meditating on Shiva for fifteen minutes. Even Sri Ramakrishna must have made some effort to develop these qualities in his previous birth. (That he was an incarnation, I cannot stop to wonder. Oddly enough the parents of all great saints are said to have had the same funny dream, so coincidental!!) It would be a great disservice to Sri Ramakrishna to simply dismiss the efforst of his previous births and just say that we was an incarnation of God or was already enlightened, by virtue of his good luck that he was born to good parents. Sri Ramakrishna (Gadadhara originally) was born in a respectable family, due to his previous efforts. I am not also saying that Ramakrishna did not realize the truth through meditation on various deities. But what he did is something we cannot do rightnow without any initiation. Therefore, we must first try to develop the tranquility of the mind by making the mind devoid of craving or aversion. (Raaga or dvesha) When the mind begins calming down, the path to realization should be sought. Satyameva Jayate Naanrtam Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted March 28, 2004 Report Share Posted March 28, 2004 My web GRAND-son(rather sun of illumination), oh i luv being called a Daadi by a super smart guy like you! it is an honor! keeta bhramara nyaya story was narrated just to reinforce Ranjit;s point that 'one becomes what one meditates on. ' The Ramakrishna example was to illustrate another point that how one has to proceed from meditating on Saguna Brahman to Nirguna brahman in order to reach the ultimate goal of Brahman realization! here is how shri ramakrishna achieved this... Totapuri, Shri Ramakrishna's guru, regarded the worship of divine forms as childish. Naked and smeared with ashes, Totapuri strolled through Dakshineswar Temple Garden and noticed Ramakrishna seated there, clapping his hands ecstatically and chanting the name of Mother Kali. Totapuri recognized at once that Ramakrishna, despite his appearance as a simple devotee of the Goddess, was inwardly prepared to receive initiation into the knowledge of the absolute, in which all forms and all emotions are left behind. Totapuri approached Ramakrishna with the proposal that he receive initiation into Advaita Vedanta. Ramakrishna replied, "I must ask my Mother Kali." He entered the temple and received permission from the living divinity that he experienced pulsatiing through the stone image enshrined there. That evening, Toatpuri began instructing him in Formless Meditation. But as Ramakrishna concentrated deeply, the radiant figure of the Goddess appeared to his inner eye. When he reported this to Totapuri, the austere naked monk took a sharp stone and pressed it firmly against Ramakrishna's forehead, instructing him to concentrate on the pain and assuring him that he could transcend the divine form and merge into the infinite expanse of the absolute. Once more, Ramakrishna meditated and, as he later expressed it, "with the sword of wisdom, I cut through the divine form of Kali." Her form dissolved, and his individuality completely disappeared into Her formless aspect. For three days Ramakrishna was completely lost to the world in a near state of suspended animation called Nirodha, seated in the small Meditation Hut, motionless, all breathing and body functions slowed to a standstill. Totapuri was amazed, because Totapuri had practiced for forty years to achieve the same level of experience -- nirvikalpa samadhi -- the disappearance of individual identity in the Absolute. It occurred to Ramakrishna in a single sitting. Ramakrishna remained silent for six days and finally, when he opened his eyes he thanked Totapuri saying "If you had not come, I would have lived my whole life with the hallucination. My last barrier has fallen away." He became Enlightened after he had cut the last barrier. But even the followers of Ramakrishna don't mention the incident because it makes the whole effort of worshipping futile. Totapuri as an orthodox wandering monk never remained more than three days in one location. However, he became so awed by Ramakrishna's ability in Samadhi to remain 'rigid as a corpse for days on end', that he broke his longstanding rule, resulting in him staying eleven months at Dakshineswar hoping to learn from the man who had previously been his disciple. During this long stay he contracted serious dysentery. There was prolonged and severe pain, which was distracting Totapuri during meditation. Since he considered the body just a medium, essentially unnecessary after the realization of the Absolute, he decided to give up his body by drowning in the Ganges. He walked out into the river, but, even though the river should have been extremely deep, at least in the middle, no matter how far he went the water never got above his knees. He ended up without ever reaching deep water. Eventually he came upon the bank on the far side and when he turned to look back, he saw the Kali temple gleaming in moonlight and experienced a sudden deep Awakening. He recognized sheer divine power and consciousness, moving through all beings and controlling all events, including his own attempt to discard the body. Totapuri thus accepted the manifest universe and its energy as a radiant expression of the Absolute. The demarcation between form and formless no longer existed for him. Although his whole life had been spiritual in nature, Totapuri, without any verbal teaching, had opened beyond he experience of the formless absolute into the continuum of consciousness, from which no divine, human, or natural forms are excluded and to which no particular doctrine exclusively applies. ********************************************************************** The most interesting facet of the whole Ramakrishna-Totapuri Awakening phase is, that although Totapuri was a highly attained monk or guru at the time, he himself, as the above account seems to testify (and is verified in other accounts), may not have been Enlightened to the nth degree at the time he was coaching Ramakrishna. Totapuri's full and total Enlightenment transpired AFTER Ramakrishna's full Awakening when he walked out into the river and saw the Kali temple gleaming in moonlight and experienced a sudden deep Awakening. He recognized sheer divine power and consciousness, moving through all beings and controlling all events, including his own attempt to discard the body. Totapuri thus accepted the manifest universe and its energy as a radiant expression of the Absolute. The demarcation between form and formless no longer existed for him. However, Totapuri's Enlightenment or lack of same notwithstanding, Ramakrishna was still able to reach Full Attainment under his auspices anyway -- http://www.angelfire.com/realm/bodhisattva/totapuri.html - 23k - ********************************************************************** So, Grand-son, tell me what is the point in narrating all this to you? i am sure you already know this story !!! If you are serious about progressing in your spiritual quest, you need a 'guru' and any 'guru' would love to initiate you !!! but are you ready? i see in your profile you state you love 'watching girls' !!! what does that mean ? "a voyeur' of some sorts!!! no, dear one, you are not ready for 'sanyas' as yet ! first, enter into holy matrimony - enjoy the life of a householder and then when the time comes take 'sanyas' ... meanwhile, you are already well- versed in the scriptures as is obvious from your writings, all you need is someone to light up that 'divine spark' already present in you!!! when will that happen? when the sisya is ready, the guru appears!! meanwhile, just accept Lord Dakshinamurthy as your guru ! Love and blessings Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted March 28, 2004 Report Share Posted March 28, 2004 Thanks for your advice dadiji, What is on my profile comes as a shock to me! Check my updated profile. I am not 22. The profile is two years old, during which time I studied the works of Shankara and the Yogavasishtha, while working in Bangalore, in Texas Instruments as a design engineer. Satyameva Jayate Naanrtam Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.