Guest guest Posted March 28, 2004 Report Share Posted March 28, 2004 Hello all, Chittaranjanji wrote: In my view, the reasons > for Buddha's silence on Brahman / Atman are inscrutable. They might > have had some purpose in the scheme of creation and human history. > But let us respect Buddha and Shankara, and let us also respect the > Acharya's exposition of Advaita with all the differences they have > with Buddhism. I agree with Chittaranjanji. But then the silence of Buddha on Brahman is still a question. The apparent reason, the Pali Canon says that the question is deceptive. It is not what it appears. Answering the question as 'yes' or 'no' would lead to an extreme position. Neither of these answers lead to the cessation (nirodha) of suffering and distress. If it were answered as 'yes', it leads to an incorrect understanding and incorrect identity of the self, thus causing more suffering. If however, it (the question) were answered as 'no', it further leads to suffering. It appears that the Buddha never answered a question without thinking of the result of the answer. He must have done what he thought was best in the situation - Just to discard such a question. I remember from my college days one such situation where my professor was discussing in the class, something about a concept essential to the understanding of many electronic circuits - That of a nullator and a norator together forming a nullor. I asked my professor, if it is possible to have just a single nullator and no norator coupled with it. His answer amazed me 'The answer to that is not going to help you become a researcher.' Later, when I came up with a novel way of making a pure nullator, uncoupled with a norator and had noticed that my professor was the first one to have ever made a pure nullator uncoupled with a norator, I realized the significance of his answer. I think, it is only after realizing the Ultimate Truth, that once can say if there exists a self or answer any question regarding that. So again, we come to the conclusion: 'The realization of the Ultimate Truth is of paramount importance.' Satyameva Jayate Naanrtam Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted March 28, 2004 Report Share Posted March 28, 2004 Namaste All Dakshinamoorthy Strotram of Sri Shankaracharya reads "Mouna vyakhya. . . . .etc. . . . "Lord Dakshinamoorthy" also taught His disciples through silence and they understood the Tatwa as "Brahman" but you can It by any name. Regards Balaji Ramasubramanian <balajiramasubramanian wrote: Hello all, Finance Tax Center - File online. File on time. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.