Guest guest Posted May 12, 2004 Report Share Posted May 12, 2004 namaste Mr Benjamin, i do agree with your view. Though agnana cannot be stated to have come into existence at any time, it certainly disappears when Gnana arises. It is agnana to think that there is agnana and that it should be dispelled. How can there be agnana in a self-luminous principle? When this truth is realized, there is no longer agnana. This knowledge cannot be attained except through Vedanta and the Guru. Even after it has been so attained, the question is whether all the miseries cease to exist at once. Two views are advocated in the works on Vedanta regarding the nature of Gnana that arises from the study of Upanishads. The view of the earlier writers is that Sravana (hearing of the Upanishads) does generate aparoksha Gnana (immediate knowledge). But as ‘aparoksha Gnana’ remains blurred on account of doubts and wrong impressions, it has to be strengthened through Manana (reflection) and Nidhidhyasana (contemplation). The other view is that the Knowledge that arises from the study of the scriptures and instruction of the Preceptor is Paroksha (Mediate). It is only through Manana and Nidhidhyasana that Paroksha Gnana can become aparoksha Gnana. The knowledge “There is Brahman” is called ‘Paroksha’; the knowledge “I am Brahman” is called ‘aparoksha’. The illusory notion “I am a man” can be truly negated only by the knowledge “I am Brahman” and not by the knowledge “There is Brahman”. The knowledge arising from the Scriptures is Paroksha in nature and cannot remove the illusory notion by itself. cdr bvn __________ Messenger - Communicate instantly..."Ping" your friends today! Download Messenger Now http://uk.messenger./download/index.html Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.