Guest guest Posted August 13, 2004 Report Share Posted August 13, 2004 Namaste to all Advaitins, A few thoughts on nyaya and vyakarana in relation to the study of Vedanta..... In order to study Vedanta in the traditional way, one needs to have prior knowledge of nyaya shastra and vyakarana. But our contemporary education makes us badly equipped to study nyaya shastra, because the way in which it is to be studied is markedly different than the way in which we are schooled to study other subjects today. The study of nyaya shastra requires purity of mind. Without purity of mind, the entire edifice of nyaya appears like a meaningless structure. Nyaya is all about padarthas, or word-objects. And this universe is nothing but nama-rupa. Nama-rupa is the same as word-objects. Therefore, the structure of the universe is the structure of word- objects. The structural relationships between words (nama, names) points to the structural relationships between objects (rupa, forms). Therefore grammar, the structure of language, points to metaphysics, the structure of the universe. It is thus that knowledge of nyaya and vyakarana becomes important for the study of Vedanta. If we try to understand the 'concepts' of nyaya through the methodologies of our contemporary education, we would in fact be moving further away from getting to their meanings. To know what a padartha is, for example, entails a cleansing of the mind to rid it of its constructive propensities. What truly is it that is called a substance, or a universal? When we try to grasp these meanings with the mind, they become elusive, and the mind is left perplexed by the absence of anything 'concrete' it can grasp. The nature of substance, or universal, eludes the analytical mind because it is already grasped before the analysing mind goes out to grasp it with its analytical mode of grasping. We do not realize that it is already grasped, and that it cannot be grasped again, over and above the grasping that has already taken place. Such an effort superimposes conceptual abstractions on to what is already grasped. The mind has already grasped substance before the question of the nature of substance is asked. Likewise, the mind has already grasped universal before the question of the nature of universal is asked. Substances and universals are not found when we look for them – they are found in receding back in quietude to see it in its originary moment of grasping. Wherefore then can we find answers to these questions when we launch ourselves from what is already grasped and look elsewhere for the answer? Analysis makes the mind grasp something else than what was already grasped – because each concept that stands to consciousness in the analysis is something else that is grasped. The moment is lost, as it were, and another moment has brought forth another thing before the mind – it has brought it forth by the very labour of its efforts. The mind is fleet of foot, and brings forth innumerable 'other' things in its labour to grasp – than that which has already been grasped! Therefore, in truth, the mind cannot grasp the truth of a thing through labour. How then are we to know the truth of things? It is obvious that the mind must be stayed from wandering in its seeking – it must be stilled, as it were, in the already grasped 'thing' so that what is grasped shines in the luminescence of consciousness without the perturbations of the mind clouding it over with its own murkiness. But this is a lot easier said than done. The mind is already made murky by the seeds of innumerable pre-conceptions that it has about a thing prior to its going out to grasp the thing, and therefore it does not allow the thing to show itself forth in its purity, but shows it with the murkiness of the mind's conceptions cast over it. Therefore, the mind must be emptied of its preconceptions about a thing before it goes out to grasp the thing so that what it grasps may shine in its pristine purity. In Yoga Shastra, this emptying of the mind is called 'pratyahara', and the mind going out to the object in a pure stream, divested of all alien conceptions of the thing, is called 'dharana'. Vedanta calls it purification of the mind. It is thus that we may understand the tenets of nyaya shastra, which is a pre-qualification for the study of Vedanta. It is thus that we may grasp the padarthas. The soul has to become a Virgin once again before she can gain entry into the Bridal Chamber of the Lord. With regards, Chittaranjan Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.