Jump to content
IndiaDivine.org

Yoga Vasistha

Rate this topic


Guest guest

Recommended Posts

Dear Adi,

 

 

I agree with all you say about Yoga Vasistha. I have the two volume edition

by Swami Venkatesananda. I wanted to know more about the historical

background, origins, authorship (if known) of the work itself.

 

best wishes,

 

Peter

 

Message: 9

Wed, 01 Sep 2004 13:28:23 -0000

"adi_shakthi16" <adi_shakthi16

Re: Yoga Vasistha

 

Yes ! Peter!

 

You are absolutely right!

 

The Yoga Vasishta is indeed an inspiring work and has influenced

great saints like Sri Ramana Maharishi, Swami Vivekananda etc ... who

used to quote from this text frequently.

 

In this great scriptural text Yoga Vasishta, complex philosophical

truths are explained through simple parables or stories.

 

<Snip>

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Peter!

 

i kind of figured out you are familiar with the work of Yoga Vasishta

when you commented 'it is an inspiring work.'

 

Well, as for the authorship - i think it is sage Valmiki. (?)

 

as far as the historical background, it is part of the epic

Ramayana.

 

and for origins- i narrated the story where how Sri Rama was troubled

by the 'dukha of samsara' ( sorrow of the material world) and wanted

to inquire into the Nature of Reality and therefore approached Sage

Vasishta ....

 

I used my google search but could not find a web site which answeed

all your questions in a detailed manner ... the sites describe more

about the Text ITSELF....

 

SORRY!

 

love and regards

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Namaste Sri Peter:

 

I am afraid that you may not be able to get any more on the

historical background than what Adiji has provided you in her

replies. I want to bring to your attention, the Vedic saying: "rishi

moolam, nadi moolam" (I don't recollect the complete verse and may be

Sunderji may be able to complete the verse). Essentially, the above

saying reminds us not to judge a rishi (saint/scholar) on the basis

of his/her birth origin but judge him/her using the present status.

Similarly the origin of the river is less important than its present

condition (purity level of the water). We all agree that 'Yoga

Vasistha' is a great scholarly work on advaita vedanta in a

conversation style - (dialog between Sage Vasistha and Divine Rama

the hero of Ramayana).

 

The Vedic system uses the 'oral tradition' to preserve scholarly

works for over 5000 years or more (no definite date can be

determined). The written work of Yoga Vasistha can vary between 5th

century AD upt to 9-11th century AD and the acceptance of the date

depends on whom we believe the most! Everyone seemms to accept that

Yoga Vasistha is a part of Ramayana (just like Bhagavad Gita being a

part of Mahabharatha. Consequently we could say that the original

words of this text have been spoken by the great sage Valmiki.

 

As you may know (Swami Venkatesananda book does mentions) that

Valmiki who wrote the Ramayana is likely the author of this work. It

is just like accepting that Vyasa who wrote the Mahabharata is the

author of Bhagavad Gita. Sri Benjamin (a member of this list and my

friend) has spent quite a bit of time looking into the historical

side of this work and he may be able provide some insights into your

question. Sri Benjamin points out that a critical reading of the

philosophy of Yoga Vasistha brings out the similarities between

advaita and Buddhist thought. He even stretches couple more steps and

finds support for "idealism" from Yoga Vasitha. (I suggest you to use

the Google search at the site:

http://www.escribe.com/culture/advaitin using the word "Yoga Vasitha)

and you will get 100 or more postings on this subject).

 

It is quite remarkable that the two great philsophical works - Yoga

Vasitha and Bhagavad Gita have been implanted in the middle of two

great epics Ramayana (by Sage Valmiki) and Mahabharat (by sage Vyasa)

respectively. Any of us who want to understand these philsophies

inevitably need to study (not just read) the personalities of the

characters, their actions and the circumstances behind those actions

in Ramayana and Mahabharat.

 

These dialogs happened between the 'Divine' and "the seeker of the

Divine." In Yoga Vasistha, the seeker of the Divine (sage Vasistha)

explains the philosophy to the Divine (Sri Ram) for confirmation. In

the Bhagavad Gita, the Divine (Sri Krishna) explains the philsophy to

the seeker of the Divine (Sri Arjuna). It seems that during the

Ramayana time there were more divinity and less evil and consequently

the Divine Sri Ram wanted to listen to the seeker (sage Vasistha).

During the Mahabharat time, there were evil and less divinity and

consequently the Divine Sri Krishna wanted to teach the seeker (Sri

Arjuna) on the Divine virtues. This may explain why the Divine Sri

Ram was in the frontstage of Ramayana and the Divine Sri Krishna was

in the backstage!

 

Warmest regards,

 

Ram Chandran

 

advaitin, "Peter M" <nous07.theos@b...> wrote:

> Dear Adi,

>

>

> I agree with all you say about Yoga Vasistha. I have the two

volume edition

> by Swami Venkatesananda. I wanted to know more about the

historical

> background, origins, authorship (if known) of the work itself.

>

> best wishes,

>

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Thank you sri Ram-ji!

 

If i recall correctly, the verse goes like this ...

 

" Rishi Moolam Nadi Moolam Parkka Kudathu" - we should not trace the

orgins of a River or a Rishi or something to that effect ....

 

Very good post! Sri RAM-JI!

 

 

I specially liked these points ...

 

( These dialogs happened between the 'Divine' and "the seeker of the

Divine." In Yoga Vasistha, the seeker of the Divine (sage Vasistha)

explains the philosophy to the Divine (Sri Ram) for confirmation. In

the Bhagavad Gita, the Divine (Sri Krishna) explains the philsophy

to the seeker of the Divine (Sri Arjuna). It seems that during the

Ramayana time there were more divinity and less evil and

consequently the Divine Sri Ram wanted to listen to the seeker (sage

Vasistha).

During the Mahabharat time, there were evil and less divinity and

consequently the Divine Sri Krishna wanted to teach the seeker (Sri

Arjuna) on the Divine virtues. This may explain why the Divine Sri

Ram was in the frontstage of Ramayana and the Divine Sri Krishna was

in the backstage!)

 

Yes, In RAma Rajya, it was 'SATYA YUGA' everything was centred

around 'dharma' and 'truth'

 

may i also add

 

 

Here's what the book (yoga vasishta) has to say about itself:

 

In this scriputre there is nothing new; but the truth has been

presented in a pleasant fashion with a number of stories. It is the

truth that is proclaimed in this scripture that is important; not the

one who has declared the truth or composed the scripture.

)

By a mere study of this scripture ... ignorance is dispelled. The

beauty of this scripture is that its student is not abandoned to his

despair; if something is not clear in the first instance, a further

study of the scripture makes it clear. This scripture dispels

delusion and enables you to realise that the ordinary life itself is

the supreme state.

 

Therefore, one should study at least a small part of the scripture

daily. If, however, one thinks it is not authoritative because it is

of human origin, one can resort to the study of any other scripture

dealing with self-knowledge and final liberation. But one should not

waste one's lifetime.

 

http://www.digiserve.com/mystic/Hindu/Vasishtha - 7k - Cached

 

 

Btw, where is Ben-ji!! He used to provide the 'comic' relief in this

group - when the discussions became too stuffy or heavy, he used to

always see the 'humor' in that situation and made us Lighten up !

Cool GUY, OUR BEN-JI!! hey, ben-ji , i am sure you will have to lot

to contribute to GREg-ji's monthly topic- after all, you are the most

vedantic bUddhist i have ever known!!! Silence, btw, does not mean

absence of Speech!! It only means 'stilling the MInd', ben-ji! You

can come out of your shell, now!!! ! smiles!!

 

 

love and regards

Link to comment
Share on other sites

advaitin, "Ram Chandran" <RamChandran@a...>

wrote:

> Namaste Sri Peter:

>

> Everyone seemms to accept that

> Yoga Vasistha is a part of Ramayana (just like Bhagavad Gita being

a

> part of Mahabharatha. Consequently we could say that the original

> words of this text have been spoken by the great sage Valmiki.

>

> As you may know (Swami Venkatesananda book does mentions) that

> Valmiki who wrote the Ramayana is likely the author of this work.

It

> is just like accepting that Vyasa who wrote the Mahabharata is the

> author of Bhagavad Gita. >

 

Namaste

 

According to Sanskrit Hindu tradition, the original Valmiki Ramayana

was perhaps much much longer than the present one that goes by the

name of Valmiki Ramayana. The words 'shata-koTi-pravistaraM' are

folklore. This 100-crore-shloka Ramayana is the source of all things

about Rama and the Ramayana. Yoga-VasishhTa must have been part of

it. The various stories about Rama that are current in the different

parts of India, but which differ in certain details from Valmiki

Ramayana, are also said to owe their origin to the shata-koTi

Ramayana. It is very difficult to comment on these traditional

opinions, in any historical research sense. ..... VK

>Vasishhtha and Bhagavad Gita have been implanted in the middle of

two

> great epics Ramayana (by Sage Valmiki) and Mahabharat (by sage

Vyasa)

> respectively. Any of us who want to understand these philsophies

> inevitably need to study (not just read) the personalities of the

> characters, their actions and the circumstances behind those

actions

> in Ramayana and Mahabharat.

>

> These dialogs happened between the 'Divine' and "the seeker of the

> Divine." In Yoga Vasistha, the seeker of the Divine (sage

Vasistha)

> explains the philosophy to the Divine (Sri Ram) for confirmation.

In

> the Bhagavad Gita, the Divine (Sri Krishna) explains the philsophy

to

> the seeker of the Divine (Sri Arjuna). It seems that during the

> Ramayana time there were more divinity and less evil and

consequently

> the Divine Sri Ram wanted to listen to the seeker (sage Vasistha).

> During the Mahabharat time, there were evil and less divinity and

> consequently the Divine Sri Krishna wanted to teach the seeker

(Sri

> Arjuna) on the Divine virtues. This may explain why the Divine

Sri

> Ram was in the frontstage of Ramayana and the Divine Sri Krishna

was

> in the backstage!

 

In view of the above remarks by Ram Chandranji, allow me to make the

following observation:

 

Arjuna's flag on the battlefield of Mahabharata carried the figure

of Hanuman of the Ramayana. Saint Thiagaraja, one of the famous

Trinity of Carnatic music of the early nineteenth century sings in

one of his songs ("Geethaarthamu") that Hanuman knows all the

contents of the Gita well enough to be able to check whether Krishna

is doing it right!. Hanuman knows it because, he has personally seen

his Ram move about in the world like a 'sthita-prajna' and 'brahma-

vit' -- descriptions of which abound in the Gita. So with a poetic

flourish Thiagaraja says that Hanuman is sitting on the flag of

Arjuna's chariot, in order to test the authenticity of the words of

the Gita, on the touchstone of Rama's ideal behaviour as

an "Aadarsha purushha"!

 

Secondly, why was Rama able to behave like a sthita-prajna?

Certainly because, he was taught advaita in his earlier days by

Vasishta . And that is what YogaVasishta is about!

 

And that incidentally, answers Greg-ji's sub topic: "What in

practice is it to practise advaita?". Lord Shri Rama is the standing

example. Listen to what Krishna said; Have Rama as your role model!!!

 

PraNAms to all advaitins

profvk

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Nameste Ramchandran-Ji & Adi-Ji:

 

 

advaitin, "adi_shakthi16" <adi_shakthi16>

wrote:

> Thank you sri Ram-ji!

>

> If i recall correctly, the verse goes like this ...

>

> " Rishi Moolam Nadi Moolam Parkka Kudathu" - we should not trace

the

> orgins of a River or a Rishi or something to that effect ....

>

 

If this was to be "really true" then we will need to determine

the "real purpose and the significance" of why "gangotri and

jamanotri" are important tiirthakshetra? Which are considered to be

the origin of Ganges and Yamunaa rivers !!.

 

Any thoughts?

 

Regards,

 

Yadunath

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Namaste Yaduji:

 

Your point is well taken and the original saying does not prevent

anyone to trace the origin of the river. The message is very subtle

and conditional. If the river (rishi) is pure there is no need to

trace the origin. Really speaking, the origin for the river water is

rain always rain and most of the time the rains that fell on the top

of a mountain become a river. The 'rishi moolam' specifically

emphasizes the fact that the greatness of a rishi depends only on

his/her scholarship and he/she is accepted in the Vedic tradition

irrespective of his/her birth origin. Sage Valmiki (a hunter and

highway robber) became a Brahmarishi and also wrote Ramayana.

 

The present dirty condition of Ganges in Banaras will force all of us

to trace back its origin. The beauty of Ganges is that as you go

higher and higher on Himalays, it becomes purer and purer and it is

purest at Gankothri. Our Vedic tradition emphasizes the importance of

purity for spiritual growth - purity of heart, body, mind and soul.

Interestingly the spiritual growth and mind purity also reaches the

peak at the top of the Himalays. This may explain why Lord Siva sits

on the top of Mount Kailas meditating in total peace and tranquility!

 

regards,

 

Ram Chandran

 

advaitin, "ymoharir" <ymoharir> wrote:

> Nameste Ramchandran-Ji & Adi-Ji:

>

>

> advaitin, "adi_shakthi16"

<adi_shakthi16>

> wrote:

> > Thank you sri Ram-ji!

> >

> > If i recall correctly, the verse goes like this ...

> >

> > " Rishi Moolam Nadi Moolam Parkka Kudathu" - we should not trace

> the

> > orgins of a River or a Rishi or something to that effect ....

> >

>

> If this was to be "really true" then we will need to determine

> the "real purpose and the significance" of why "gangotri and

> jamanotri" are important tiirthakshetra? Which are considered to be

> the origin of Ganges and Yamunaa rivers !!.

>

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Namaste yaduji:

 

Let me add the following observations to complete my thoughts

on "Rishi Mooam and Nadi Moolam..." for further clarifications:

 

In the Vedic tradition, those who achieved the higher peaks of

spiritual maturity and scholarship, get the title recognition Rishi.

Consequently when the person becomes a Rishi, his/origin is

immaterial. In the case of Nadi (river) the origin is always

recognized as pure and holy. This may explain why Gangotri,

Jamanotri, TalaiKaveri are considered sacred. With this understand,

we should interpret the statement "rishi moolam, nadi moolam" by the

following: The purity of a Rishi is determined by the present where

as the sacredness of a river is determined by its origin!

 

Warmest regards,

 

Ram Chandran

 

Note: Actually I was looking for the original Sanskrit verse that

starts with "rishi moolam, nadi moolam...." The Tamil version stated

by Adiji has the potential for misunderstanding (as observed by

yaduji). This Tamil interpretation came as a supporting evdience for

the eradication the Caste System in Tamil Naud. I want to thank

Yaduji was raising the question and force me think for better

insights for the Sanskrit verse.

 

advaitin, "ymoharir" <ymoharir> wrote:

> If this was to be "really true" then we will need to determine

> the "real purpose and the significance" of why "gangotri and

> jamanotri" are important tiirthakshetra? Which are considered to be

> the origin of Ganges and Yamunaa rivers !!.

>

> Any thoughts?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
×
  • Create New...