Guest guest Posted September 26, 2004 Report Share Posted September 26, 2004 Namaste. This may sound repetitive. Yet, let us try to see where we are in this labyrinthine discussion of the month. There is this wealthy man married with sons and daughters. He loves his wife and children. The beauty and virtues of his wife make him a proud husband. He is happy on that count. The exemplary behaviour of his children and their academic excellence also give him happiness. He is a proud father. He also owns a beautiful, modern car and other precious possessions and comforts like bungalows and estates. He is proud of possessing them too. Ownership grants him very satisfying status and esteem. Then one day things go awry for him. He spots certain deficiencies in his wife and children. His neighbour buys a better car than his and gains better riches. All these make him unhappy. He thus realizes that the things which give him happiness can turn out to be a source of unpleasantness. He ponders the situation and realizes that his relationship with them is a matter of give and take. There was anticipation in it. Fulfillment of anticipation means happiness and hindrances thereto results in unhappiness. Love and happiness are, therefore, inseparable. A religious person then tells him that all these mundane relationships are a matter of sakti and full of ups and downs. They cause both happiness and unpleasantness. The only lasting solution is the love for God, which he calls bhakti. So, our guy plants a God as the object of his love. He has no difficulty getting one as there are several images around him to choose from. He then gets into full-time devotional practices like worshipping, meditation, chanting prayers, visiting temples, reading material of piety etc. No doubt, he makes some spiritual progress that grants him relative peace. However, one day he pauses to think. Why am I doing all this? The answer is crystal-clear to him. He is *seeking* blemishelss love that can give him lasting happiness. He finds a difference too. The objects of his former love, like wife, children and car, were known entities, whereas the current one, God, is not known at all, although there is an objectified image of Him beautifully attired, armed yet smiling and offering boons. He is not, therefore, satisfied and sets on a quest to understand more about God. Advaita comes in now and proclaims to him "That thou art!" – meaning the object that you are in love with is truly yourself. He thinks over it and comes to terms with the new understanding. The implication is very clear to him. It was his own happiness that was the guiding factor in all his relationships so far – with his wife, children, friends and ultimately the imposed concept of God itself. He loves himself only and that he does without setting any conditions. He also realizes that even while he called himself a bhakta in the last case, he really was a sakta as he was attached to his concept of God just for the sake of finding lasting happiness. He plunges into advaita, reads, listens, performs austerities and ultimately gains a basic vision of himself – a vision that tells him that he himself is the Truth and all that he was relating so far to – his wife, children, friends, possessions and the world at large – are in fact he himself. Mind you, this is just an understanding and he has no doubts about the logic and truth of it. However, this understanding demands a certain behaviour from him. He has to treat everything as himself, which he finds impossible to accomplish due to the ingrained weaknesses in his personality and his overweighing ego- centric individuality. He thus concludes that if his conviction of the Truth is really strong enough, a deliberate practice (abhyAsa) is required to really live that Truth (jnAna) and be ultimately spontaneous in it. Otherwsie, the new knowledge that he possesses becomes hypocrisy. Only such practice can cleanse him of his isolated individuality and merge him with the whole world with which he has so far been relating as an objectification outside and totally separate from him. He thus takes to the path of right action called KarmaYOga whereby the knowledge (jnAna) that he is everything and as such is in love with everything without any anticipation of rewards or returns grows on him slowly. The concept of God – an objectification yet – holds his hand en route. He understands that that God is his own swarUpa without any rUpa at the end of the road. HE NOW KNOWS THE SIGNIFICANCE OF *PRACTICE* IN ADVAITA. (Is any one among us doing this? If yes, let him/her come out with helpful personal tips to enrich this discussion at the end of the month.) Ultimately, when he has grown into Oneness with everything, there is nothing that is apart or separate from him. His initial spontaneous love now stands transformed into all-consuming Universal Love. In the Oneness that he is now, he doesn't need different terms like lover or bhakta or even jnAni to distinguish himself because all such terms raises questions of a dualistic nature like : Love what? Bhakti to whom? Know what? He is thus Bhakti that is JnAna that is Love that is Happiness. The four and himself are not different any more. There are simply no four. SO, FROM THE POINT OF VIEW OF WE, THE STRUGGLERS, HE *APPARENTLY* COMPOSES THE `NIRGUNAMANASA PUJA' FOR OUR SAKE. (Thanks Sunderji). We have now reached Maniji's understanding of true bhakti and that is the end of the road for us. PraNAms. Madathil Nair Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted September 27, 2004 Report Share Posted September 27, 2004 Thank you Shriman Nair-ji for a very well written post and a convincing one too !!! i also want to join you in thanking Shri Sunder-ji for initiating the posting of 33 verses from Adi Sankara's Nirguna Manasa Puja ! After all, it is a known fact that of all the forms of worship, Nirguna Worship is the most exalted one. Sunder-ji mentioned 81 types of bhakti from the Narada Sutras. Over and above the 81 types of Bhakti is Nirguna Bhakti .... here is a sloka that confirms this ..... mad-guNa-shruti-mAtreNa mayi sarva-guhAshaye / manogatir-avicchinnA yathA gang-Ambhaso-mbudhau // lakshhaNaM bhaktiyogasya nirguNasya hyudAhRtaM / ahaitukya-vyavahitA yA bhaktiH purushhottame // Having heard about Him, one gets addicted with devotion that does not see any distinction, without any expectation of results, to the Purushhottama, who lives in the deepest hearts of all, like the waves of the ocean that turn back to the ocean everytime it is thrown on the shore. (courtesy- professor-ji- posted in my group sadhana_shakti) But having said this ... Can one size fit all? Nair-ji is magnanimous in conceding at the end of his post We have now reached Maniji's understanding of true bhakti and that is the end of the road for us. The key phrase is "Mani-ji's understanding" --- YES !! dear hearts ! MANI-JI'S UNDERSTANDING!! and Nair-ji also uses the phrase " strugglers" in the concluding para of his post.... i will enhance that word "strugglers" with another qualifying adjective " struggling beginners on the path" !!!! Many of us may not be endowed with maniji's sense of Dispassion and Discrimination ( vairagya and viveka) .... For such of us , the concept of a personal God/ess and the saguna worship of such a God/ess is of great significance !!! we may not have yet graduated to the stage of Nirguna Manasa puja! From Rupa we progress to Ni-Rupa ( form to formless) , from Sakara to Akara and from Saguna to Nirguna!!!! Nair-ji gave the example of wife, children and other material possessions ...YES! how does a Shakta/Bhakta Like Sri. Ramakrishna approach his wife? Shri Ramakrishna performed "shodasi" puja to his wife and with this puja he proclaimed more or less to all " None , O beloved , ever loved the wife for wife's sake, but it is the Goddess in the wife which is loved." (to paraphrase)... Yes, a grihasta who became a Renunciate in mind and body ... but is this possible for lesser mortals like us ? How to conquer all the lowly passions and all the ASHTA VARGAS ? (eightfold obstacles) - Kama (Lust), Krodha (anger), Lobha (greed/coveteousness ) , Moha (delusion) , Mada, (pride), Matsarya (jealousy) , Darpa (arrogance), Dambha (hypocrisy)and the king of them Ahamkara ( e-go) ? This are the demons in all of us. So, for a beginner , a step by step 'ritualistic' puja is a great start.... how can one create the 'bhava' of Advaita without performing the 'kriya' of Adwaita? Attitude comes only after repeated practice !! Start worshipping 'archa-vigraha' of God/ess and then graduate to worshipping God/ess in each and every one around you ! The problem with those fanatics situated in Bhakti yoga is e they worship the Stone image as Narayana but fail to worship the Humans nas ( nara) a Narayana! and this is where 'attitude' helps! Nara seva Narayana seva - karma yoga par excellance!!! Gandhiji, Mother Teresa etc practiced this Bhava of Advaita! and a Parama Jnani is at heart a true bhakta or else how else would you explain this great devotional verse of Adi Sankara in Sivananda Lahari? " A man caught in a current seeks the shore; a tired traveler, the shade of a tree; one caught in the rain, his comfortable home; a person in quest of hospitality, a householder; a poverty-stricken person, a charitable and wealthy man; a person in dense darkness, a lamp; and one exposed to cold, a well fired hearth. In the same way, O my mind, seek the lotus feet of Shiva – the feet that destroy all fear. " AS OUR BELOVED THAKORE SHRI RAMAKRISHNA SAYS .. "The whole world is a lunatic asylum. Some are mad after sex, some are mad after worldly success, others after fame, some after wealth, and some after powers or salvation in heaven. I too am mad. I am mad after God. You are mad, so am I. I think my madness is the best." Hari Aum Tat Sat !!! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.