Guest guest Posted October 17, 2004 Report Share Posted October 17, 2004 sri nairji, <<Can you kindly tell me what you mean by 'apophatic'?Is it the traditional neti, neti?>> sri nairji, if there is anything traditional abt neti, neti approach, im sorry apophatic is not that. neti is a technique that reverses the tendency of the mind which has long (traditionally) been corrupted by incorrect cognition of the self and the universe. <<If yes, then from the way you have described it, it looks like arriving at 'something' by excluding 'other things'.>> what r 'other things'? what is 'something'? the notion that one will arrive at 'something' by the insight itself is wrong. it is this tendency of the mind that we must reverse. we r used to thinking that 'something' shud be obtained for happiness. moksha also appears like an object being sought in a mktplace (refer Sankara's upanishad bhashya here) that there exist 'other things', is also a wrong view. it is the attachement with the 'something' that causes sorrow. the neti technique is that of renunciation. everything that has been previously assumed (even if not at intellectual level, it still remains at a sub-conscious level. to remove it we need prajnA or knowledge) as the self which includes form, feelings, perceptions, past emotions and actions and (conditioned) consciousness is seen as not-self (thru proper insight) and are abandoned. this is the key to self-realization. at the end of it whether there is an acquisition of a 'self' or not is part of one's own theorization, but to the one who is enlightened, there is no way he can say this. one who is not enlightened can anyway not say what this realization is like, but even an enlightened one cant. in such a state where all (conditioned) consciousness vanishes (it is thru conditioned consciousness that one cognizes a self and another different from the self) thru what can one know the self? when an enlightened one cognizes something it is not thru normal consciousness (which has the essential characteristic of clinging). then thru what shall he explain to the unenlightened ones, what this enlightenment is, for what he has know is very much beyond the realm of the six senses, or consciousness. <<If the full cleansing mentioned by Toniji takes place, then that real nature should shine on its own.>> yes. i did not deny it. <<Has anything, manifest or unmanifest, been excluded here?>> but where did i exclude any manifest or unmanifest. i used the term unmanifest to refer to that enlightenment which is beyond any perception or senses. which can occur only by renunciation of all ideas (imaginations) of the self and understanding at a very subtle level of the origination of all these ideations of self. this is the neti approach. i don't know if u can appreciate it, but incidentally it is the same as the anatta teaching of the buddha. -balaji Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.