Jump to content
IndiaDivine.org

Who is the realised one?

Rate this topic


Guest guest

Recommended Posts

tatasthaa: Who is the realised one? Can another person understand the

realised one? How can one who is not realised... could understand the

one who is realised? What are the differences? How would he behave?

 

bindu: ah! No one can understand him, they can only have faith in god

 

1. who is the realised one? He is unknowable..... unspeakable, he

knows himself. He has become himself.

 

ashoka: as without realization no one know who is the true one

 

bindu: Yes, but wait..

 

2. can another person understand the realised one?

 

ashoka: No, only by certain signs.

 

bindu: No, however a person can have faith in god.... it is not

possible to determine if a person is realised by logic or by any

comparative. Why? Because when we go to a realized persons presence,

we disappear..... we forget who we are does not see us, our ego gets

dissolved in him

 

tatasthaa: hmm

 

bindu: Yet when we leave him we will say .. .gee there is something

different about that person... but i cannot tell what it is.

 

ashoka: Bindu there are signs

 

bindu: Those will be applicable ashoka only in the context of a

realized one who is not an Avadhuta an Avadhuta may be one moment

mad, another he may be god. At another time he may be a child,

another the guru, you will never know him

 

ashoka: exactly, but still there is this pull, this flute that pulls

us to him,

 

tatasthaa: When u are fitatasthaaed explaining ji please.. let us

know how is love and realisation linkeda

 

bindu: Yes, tatasthaa "how are love and realisation linked?" Love and

consciousness are the same thing; As i have said earlier, to the

degree that you love god, so will be your awareness, so love is the

catalyst of realization

 

tatasthaa: oh

 

ashoka: even that belongs to HIM, so who can love?

 

bindu: Yes, the Bhakti will merge into parabhakti and become one with

love; then he will know he himself is the lord himself; he who is not

a bhakti will not merge with the lord.

 

tatasthaa: In order to love lord.. do we need to separate our selves?

 

bindu: No, we should know that the love in us is his consciousness.

 

tatasthaa: Once we feel one with lord.. how does this love takes

place?

 

bindu: listen carefully.

 

LOVE is the mirror of consciousness itself; love is that which lights

up the knowledge "that i am conscious without the existence of the

cosmos" ... (in fact it is the transcendental lord himself).

 

However When we humans think of love we tend to think of loving

something, but if we love love itself, we will soon recognize that

the lord seeks himself (Radhe\Love) as the love in us.... so when we

deliberately love Radhe Maa as Love.

 

tatasthaa: But ji.. Krishna says in chapter 18 verse 40 in Gita:

"There is no being, either on earth or among the celestial

controllers in heaven, who can remain free from these three modes of

Material Nature." (18.40)"

 

bindu: That is right, In the realization, the realized one realizes

he is not that man sitting there, since it it the self who realizes

himself as the self, it is not the yogi who realizes himself at all

 

Loving love, There is a gradual snowballing effect of

awareness\light, as the love compounds as we love it.

 

One might think one is being a doer by loving, but the only valid

thing the Will can do that is not egotistical is to love LOVE (to

Love Radhe).

 

We misuse the Will by not loving deliberately, we are self-willed and

egotistical if we do not love. To love deliberately is to be

compassionate. You see love is the only thing that exists that is its

own reflection, this is why it compounds as we love love.

 

Parabhakti consists in this Loving love herself as Radhe Ma, the Will

in us is of course Siva

 

tatasthaa: Yes ji, but when it comes to realization.. can we realise

the love fully? as Krishna states There is no being existing, either

here or among the demigods in the higher planetary systems, which is

freed from the three modes of material nature.

 

bindu: What you must realize devi is that the realized one has

realized he does not exist hence he is free from those modes. However

his body may be subject to them, but he is not his body he

understands his body came as mere clothing on the concept of i-ness.

Having given up i-ness, his body is an empty shell he no longer

dwells in it.

 

Nor does he dwell as the three modes themselves, he knows they too

are clothing on the concept of i-ness, hiding non-existence within.

 

Hence Sri Dattatreya says in his wonderful Avadhuta Gita:

 

Chapter Four, Verses two and three...

 

2. The absolute is not liberated from bondage and obstruction.

 

The Absolute is not purified, cleansed and released.

 

The Absolute is not liberated by union or separation.

 

I am indeed the free One, like the sky.

 

 

 

3. I have developed no false notion

 

that all this reality come into existence

 

or that all this unreality comes into existence.

 

I am free from disease - my form has been extinguished.

 

 

 

So the connection between realization and love is the Will to LOVE,

this is true.

 

tatasthaa: but when it come to realization.. can we realise the love

fully?

 

ashoka: Ichha Shakti Kriya Shakti Gnana Shakti is Uma Shakti of Shiva

 

bindu: the very thought that "WE" might be able to realize that love

is preposterous ... as it is his not ours...... but remember the Will

is Siva.... so then to deliberately Will to Love Love.. WILL take us

to realization, this is Parabhakti.

 

Yes Ashoka has it but note also:

 

Chapter Four, Verse One of Avadhuta Gita...

1. There is neither invitation nor casting off;

 

How can there be flowers, leaves,

 

meditations and recitation of sacred texts,

 

and how can there be worship of Siva -

 

which is identity in non-difference?

 

 

This means that to worship the Icchaa Sakti or any Sakti is to

worship identity in non-difference.

 

This is why i say:

Who has Karma ? No-one it is his....

Who has Kriya? No-one it is his....

Who has jnana No-one it is his....

 

Thus since the realized one knows he does not exist he has no karma,

he is free. This is realization. Since there is but one self how can

i have any karma? Either it is his or it does not exist, either way

it is not mine.

 

tatasthaa: ji.. you are saying Will is lord Siva.. Love is Radha ma..

so do u need will power to love? I thought love is love.. it comes

automatically. I didn't know.. that we need Will to love..

 

bindu: Will IS Siva, So the only correct use of WILL is to love

Radhe, or love Love. Then it is not the ego doing this but Siva.

 

tatasthaa: What is will? tell me about will. What is the correct use

of will?

 

bindu: If we talk about WILL existing as a latent or potential power

in the Absolute ... we can see that Will is the omnipotent power of

Lord Siva; we can say that Will is the omnipotent power of lord Siva.

But Siva without his Sakti is powerless. The Will is his Sakti. It is

his existence itself.

 

Will is pure Sakti..... Sakti that has not yet moved or been

employed; so it cannot be seen or known. It can only be recognized in

itself by the Lord in Himself. Yet there exists a very deep secret

about how the lord acts to create

it consists in the fact that He does not act at all.

 

The sheer power of His Will held in check.... causes the

Manifestation of the Sakti, which vibrates as the primordial unstruck

Pranavam; then the moola-maya appear "AS" that manifestation of His

potency (AS A RESULT OF HIS NOT MOVING HIS WILL) this potency is the

potential-to-be which appears as the diversity known as His Own

Consciousness (we call it TIME). It is Maya, Samsara, knowledge and

ignorance. Then there comes the whole of the Cosmic display.

 

But to return to the WILL in Himself; Lord Siva Shines forth as all

the Cosmos simply by existing, never by actually acting. Think of it

like the power in a massive hydro-electric dam - pent up but

unreleased, this is due to his tapas generated by remaining still in

Himself.

 

The Yogi taps this by developing Bhakti to such a degree that he

always keeps his inner mind focused in the Will of Lord Siva.

 

So as you can see this is a very complex question, this is the very

deepest understanding of the Sakti. to realize how the lord actually

creates the universe simply by the fact of His existing.

 

tatasthaa: yes ji, it is quite hard to understand.

 

bindu: It is like the magnetism in a magnet that is not yet placed

near steel.

 

bindu: Now tatasthaa, i recommend that you read these files in the

following order

 

1. How to Become Nothing

2. How to Become NOT After Having Become

3. I Am Not What YOU Think I Am

 

They will help immensely with learning how to remain in the Self;

After all, this is what the lord is doing; so to realize him we must

learn it. In fact to come out of it is to push out the ego - to

become - to exist - to be

to arrogate ... i.e to separate from Him; so i recommend remaining in

Him

 

ashoka: Bindu why then they teach not to ask for 4 types of Mukti

1. Sayujya - To be like HIM

2. Samipya - To be near HIM

3. Salokya - To be in His Kingdom

4. Sarupya - to have his form

Why do they teach that

 

bindu: Because who will have them Ashoka? Who will be them? Jiva.

 

ashoka: I understand what u r saying.

 

bindu: Who will be in his kingdom? Jiva certainly wont get there

 

ashoka: I understand that.

 

bindu: Realization will not happen to jiva, The Lord REALIZES

Himself, we do not.

 

ashoka: But the play of Golokha, is what then. Who plays with whom?

 

bindu: In the story about Lakshmi telling Vishnu stories which make

him dream up the world

 

ashoka: a devotee, just wishes to serve eternally, what do u think of

that humility and desire?

 

bindu: Does the lord not serve himself in the form of the devotee?

Does The Lord not desire only Himself?

 

ashoka: Everything is the Lord, I know all of that, why then u say,

wishing to come out TO BE is ego, whose Ego?

 

bindu: we are talking from the point of view if Siva Maa, not

Krishna; but the trouble comes when the jiva thinks he is the doer,

the devotee. or the one performing the seva, When in fact it is The

Lord worshipping Himself in all cases.

 

bindu: The Transcendental lord Krishna seeks Himself so He splits

Himself up into many bits ... His Transcendental Self remains in His

abode if you like to say that.

 

ashoka: yes yes

 

bindu: Love comes then. This splitting happens as a result of his

sheer existence.... His WILL IS LOVE itself ... does He not seek His

own love? this empowers His transcendental Will...

 

Love blasts out of Him as Light then becomes denser as it manifests

more and more as the Cosmos, from the subtlest to the most gross

light\love\consciousness. But He is the Transcendnetal conscious SELF

who is conscious of His OWN consciousness which exists as the

ParamAtma.

 

There seems to be jiva but jiva is His reflection in each particle of

His OWN being, thus Jiva is not him but his reflection only... and

just as the mirrored image in your bathroom mirror is not you, nor is

the reflection in the consciousness ort in you him himself,; it is

merely his reflection. This is why we say Neti Neti.. not this nor

this..

 

ashoka: He wishes to enjoy HIMSELF

 

bindu: Enjoy is the wrong word Ashoka as to enjoy implies need ...

The Lord needs nothing.

 

ashoka: He does not.

 

bindu: He exists AS love his enjoyment IS LOVE; His consciousness is

Love, His very being is Love. Thus he says only his devotees ....

only his bhaktas will attain him, he also says that to his bhaktis

will accrue all yogas

 

ashoka: Rasa Raja, Kanha. wants to be Meera, wants to be Radha

 

bindu: He does not want anything Ashoka, HE "IS " everything! He has

no desires. He simply exists as bliss itself

 

Ashoka: i know bindu, i just have to experience it will come with

grace and practice; what to do?

 

 

bindu: Ashoka, you say dear: "i just have to experience"

 

Let go of that I. say to Him in your heart Oh Lord it is not i who

can experience you, it is you yourself that does this. say Oh Lord

this whole world out here is your Lila and has no self nature as you

alone are The Self. Do not become even an experiencer, neither a

thinker, nor knower, nor a possessor or owner. Do not think that you

have anything in the first place to renounce, as there is no

renunciate either, Since The Lord is all

Om Namah Sivaya

 

ashoka: Mere Shyaamal Krishna Kanhai

Tu Ye Kaisi Preet Lagaayi

Praano Mein Bansi Bajaai

Saason Mein Chhip Kar Aayi

 

Naina Ye Dhoonde Hardam

Dil Gaaye Tere Sargam

Man Tarse Roop Anoopam

Aayo Mere Paas Priyatam

 

Bin Tere Jeevan Soona

Banaao Mujhe Tu Apnaa

Laaj Meri Ye Rakhanaa

Radhe Ko Sanga Laana

 

Brindavan Banjaye Jeevan

Dikhlaye Tujhe Man Darapan

Karoon Mein Ansoo Ke Arapan

Tere Paaon Mein Atma Samarpan

 

bindu: i say again: Since there is only Him, how can i have any

karma ... or any vasanas, how can i have any jnana or Kriya? All is

His and His only..... How can i have any jnana or Kriya? How can i

have any Self-nature?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
×
  • Create New...