Guest guest Posted March 26, 2005 Report Share Posted March 26, 2005 The only difference between a relative-fool, like me, and Shankara is thoughts. A MIND IS WHAT IT THINKS: If a mind thinks it is Shankara then that is an absolute truth: it is thinking it is Shankara. If a mind thinks that a fool is Shankara then Shankara is that fool. If a mind thinks that this is Shankara writing to tell us that he is a fool then these words are Shankara telling us that he is a fool. If a mind thinks that these words are indeed Shankara then this mind would understand that Shankara did not have Quantum Physics and Relativity to help him explain his Advaita. Such a Shankara is now telling us that today even a relative-fool can Realize that physics is telling us the exact same story of Advaita that he tried to tell us, through Ramana. Physics is telling us: The universe and everything in it is the Nothing called thoughts, maya. Other than this Nothing, called thoughts, Reality is the “not-two” Singularity or “Unified Field” called Atman, the Self – the Samadhi of dreamless-sleep. - alias Shankara, and/or Einstein, and/or any other alias the mind has to think for its thoughts. Otherwise: TTCOON (Thoughts That Come Out Of Nothing) Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted March 26, 2005 Report Share Posted March 26, 2005 Dear Gee Pee, Why does a mind think what it thinks? If a mind thinks that fire is cold, does the fire become cold? Nietzsche made the same mistake - thinking that life-furthering value- tables could be built without consideration to truth. Protagoras thought that man was the measure of all things. But fire never becomes cold despite all the thinking of the mind. The mind is restless like the wind. The mind is mischievous like a monkey jumping about from tree to tree. The mind is faithless like a harlot. Despite what the mind thinks, the nature of mind itself can't be contrary to its own nature and by that very fact do all natures become independent of the mind. That independence is the great Rtam of Nature. Chittaranjan advaitin, Gee Pee <gpalotas> wrote: > > > The only difference between a relative-fool, like me, and Shankara is thoughts. > > A MIND IS WHAT IT THINKS: If a mind thinks it is Shankara then that is an absolute truth: it is thinking it is Shankara. > > If a mind thinks that a fool is Shankara then Shankara is that fool. > > If a mind thinks that this is Shankara writing to tell us that he is a fool then > > these words are Shankara telling us that he is a fool. > > If a mind thinks that these words are indeed Shankara then this mind would understand that Shankara did not have Quantum Physics and Relativity to help him explain his Advaita. > > Such a Shankara is now telling us that today even a relative-fool can Realize that physics is telling us the exact same story of Advaita that he tried to tell us, through Ramana. > > Physics is telling us: The universe and everything in it is the Nothing called thoughts, maya. Other than this Nothing, called thoughts, Reality is the "not-two" Singularity or "Unified Field" called Atman, the Self – the Samadhi of dreamless-sleep. > > > > - alias Shankara, and/or Einstein, and/or any other alias the mind has to think for its thoughts. Otherwise: TTCOON (Thoughts That Come Out Of Nothing) > > > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.