Guest guest Posted May 31, 2005 Report Share Posted May 31, 2005 Namaskar Nididhyasan Prayojan - Suggestions for those who do not want to enter “Sanyas” life style but want to take advantage of Vedanta knowledge. Adhikar - All those who like Vedanta including new readers/listeners Vishay - Meaning and Practicability of Nididhyasan in general. I am not a master of words. I write the words of my masters. Mistakes if any in this writing are mine and please forgive me for that. This is not taken from any book or told by any Acharya. However, this can not be beyond Shastra limits. Vedanta philosophy is like reading and studying how Sherpa Tensingh climbed Mount Everest. There are two types of readers of these kinds of adventure stories. Some people like only reading and enjoying the thrill and others want to get inspired by the actual experience of the conquerors and practice it in their own mountaineering expeditions. The people who are attracted to reading of adventure stories sitting at home derive happiness of thrill. In the same way the people who are attracted to read Vedanta enjoy the intellectual happiness. They become masters of Vedanta, but when it comes to Brhamcharya, Vairagya, Guru etc. they are so scared that they give up reading those pages and jump to next chapters. This fear is very common and nobody be blamed for that. One difference in mountaineering and Vedant reading is that, in later one gets involved by mind and hence is always subject to change in his mental set up and consequently physical habits, whether he wants it or not. One remarkably wonderful thing is that, even if any body is a new reader of Vedant Shastra, every page which he reads adds to his confidence that he is understanding the most complicated science of God and he gets happiness and encouragement to read further. Also, with every page he understands that something which his mind is searching is not on that page and might be on the next page, or a next chapter or different book or might be that he will be able to find it next day. He always experiences a very little restlessness in the corner of his mind because intelligent mind travels fast to Jidhnyasa stage. In fact his Jeeva had started the Anusandhan (the quest) of its original form without formally taking permission from his mind. (Sanyas). This starts “Sundhopasundhi” (dual fight) between Jeeva and Mind. Mind understands duties, responsibilities, love, appointments, pleasure in activities etc. Jeeva tries to make the mind nervous in worldly matters. During this fighting Jeeva continues with the process of clearing “Adhnyan” with Sravan-Manan advancement. Jeeva being powerful, ultimately wins over the mind like Dara Singh , let how long the battle continues. In old days there would be free style fighting bouts (show) between Dara Singh and King Kong, and people used to be very sure that Dara Singh would win after a few rounds of loss to King Kong, despite what ever was written in paper advertisements about the strength of King Kong. So, the Nididhyasan process secretly starts in the person who starts reading or listening Vedanta. Most of the people who start reading Vedanta would never like to become Jeevan Mukta, if they have not made up their mind for such a change in their life style in company of enlightened Guru, because the happiness enjoyed by Jeevan Mukta is beyond their understanding capacity. A company of Guru is a chance to observe and understand, what really a bliss could be. It is difficult for them to imagine “AtmaneWatmanaTushtah”, though they can deliver a three- hour lecture on this Geeta sloka and keep the audience spell bound. It is difficult that their mind can come out of Bandhan of family, society and money earning activity. However, like those who read books for guidance in actual mountaineering, the people with determination to obtain “Atmadhnyan” make up their mind for gradually giving up the bodily concerns. Rest of the people do get enjoyment and intellectual satisfaction of reading Vedanta, but it is impossible for them to come out of Sukh-Dukh of life and out of the Janmantar cycle. Sravan, Manan and Nididhyasan is often not understood by the new readers of Vedanta literature correctly. Here is a sloka which describes about this. 1. Shravan Shabda Shakti Vishayam Nirupanam Uktitah Shravanam Uchyate 2. Manan Vastu Tatwa Vishayam Nirupanam Uktito Mananmitudiryate 3 Nididhyasan Chetsastu Chitimatrasheshata Dhyanam Iti Abhivadanti Vaidikah. Shravan is the reading or listening of Vedant Vichar. Only reading or listening however, do not suffice the purpose. “Shabda Shakti Vishayam Nirupanam” is necessary. Upanishad verses are not simple poetry, those are Mantra(s), may be in prose form sometimes. A new reader/listner who is not a Sadhak (has not undertaken sadhan) has therefore, to understand the Lakshyartha from Acharya and should not be confident about the meaning which he thought unless verified. Acharya though not Brahmanishta, should atleast be Nishnaat. In Brahmavidya. Manan is to understand BrahmaVastu; “Vastu Tatwa Vishayam Nirupanam”. I have seen some poor people engaged in business of collecting dusts from the shops of the gold-ornament makers. They know the process of finding out gold particles from the dust. Manan is the similar process. Out of many words one has to find out only “Tatwa” and rest of the words may be understood with secondary importance. This is a process of deeper thinking and one gets habituated to his very soon. Nididyasan is frequently trying to become “Chitimatra Shesha” (practice to live as if one has no body, but only Ekagra consciousness). Vaidika say , “Chetsastu Chitimatrasheshata Dhyanam” is Dhyan or Nididhyasan. Sadhak should remain only “Chaitanyarupa” by his “Antahkaran”. This is expected from Sadhak when he practice Nididhyasan, and this not a easy job. He has to be almost in Samadhi while performing his routines. This is very difficult without Vivek, Vairagya, Sham-damadi and Mumukshatwa the four Sadhan prescribed by Shastra. If this is difficult for even the senior Sadhka (s), what should new readers/listeners do for the Nididhyasan ? This is the question to be dealt in this writing. Lokmanya Tilak has said in his famous “GeetaRahasya” that if everybody is Adwaitin in this country and observes Vairagya, who will look after the defense and administration ? If everybody observes Brahmacharya, (eight points), what will be the population of this country after five decades ? Lokmanya had uttered this only to advocate Karma Yoga and make people aware of their right of independence and need to fight for it. We can not say that Lokmanya did not know that Vairgya was not everybody’s carrot. The fact is that Vairagya is the greatest gift of God to human being, because all his agonies and penuries end with Vairagya. It is a Anugraha of God and everybody can not get it. Jagatguru in his Shatshloki (14) has described Vairagya of two kinds. 1. Nairvedya and 2. Dhnyangarbha. Both of these kinds are only curse (in Vyawahar) or gift of providence. Even if a thought of Sanyas arises in mind, it is a blessing, because it is a step towards knowledge that nothing in this world can satisfy the human mind for more than few moments. How then new readers/listeners can take up Nididhyasan without resorting to Sanyas and without observing the Sadhan Chatushtaya ? “Asupteramruteh Kalam Nayed VedantChintaya” Till you sleep or till you breathe last, continue thinking on Adwaita Vedanta is the only possible way advises Shastra for those who are not inclined to renounce the worldly life. This has to be understood in perspective and not to the word. The people with higher responsibilities like politicians, executives, businessmen and many others shall find it impossible to keep up the Vedanta thoughts till going to bed. If they loose their concentration in their jobs, they will loose many things of their own and others. How maximum time out of day could be spared for Vedanta thoughts should be decided by them, and should be planned in such a way that this time will be increasing day by day so that when they will think that they are free from the responsibilities of life, they will be able to enter Vidwat Sanyas. Every second of time when they find leisure, is expected to be spent in Chintan of the Almighty Parmatma who is well within everybody’s body and nowhere. Please believe me that let Parmatma be Nirguna Nirakar, He will be with you like your loving father every moment of your life if you surrender to him by giving up your thought of “I am”, and just continue your Sadhan of Sravan-Manan-Nididhyasan during every possible period of time of your life. You are not required to go for Vairagya with the above process of Nididhyasan and not to be away from you family and work. Let me tell you that Parmatma comes to your help and rescue, anytime with any name and form whenever you are in “KimKartavyam” perplexity. He will advice you what to do, He will bring himself food for you if you are hungry, He will bring money for you if you need it, He will come in any disguise and help you in adversities, provided you do not at anytime give up the Adwaita Vedanta thinking. This is true and this is Pratidhnya of the great Indian Saints. This can also be everybody’s experience. You do not have to do anything. Absolutely nothing ! No Sanyas or no Sadhan Chatushtaya. Just you have to be in Brahma Chintan for maximum time you can. It is an experience that Nityanitya Vivek, Vairagya, Sham-dam-titiksha and all is taken care by Parmatma automatically. You need not to bother for anything. Though He is Asang you will surprisingly realise the Shruti, "Tadejati Tanneijati" and Brahma shall be with you. Do not think of Samadhi, Sakshatkar or Atmadhnyan. It becomes His responsibility and He is very generous to grant you everything you desire. Yours, Anil Note from Moderator: Thanks and Appreciation for an excellent post. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted June 1, 2005 Report Share Posted June 1, 2005 Jeeva had started the Anusandhan (the quest) of its original form without formally taking permission from his mind. (Sanyas). This starts "Sundhopasundhi" (dual fight) between Jeeva and Mind. Mind understands duties, responsibilities, love, appointments, pleasure in activities etc. Jeeva tries to make the mind nervous in worldly matters. Shri Anilji, I share List Moderator's appreciation for this excellent post. However a small query. You have posited Jeeva as an entity that 'thinks' and opposes mind. So far as I know Jeeva is just a spark of consciousness. Jeeva does not think. It is just a witness of thoughts that go on in the mind. It is the mind (though empowered by the power of Jeeva) that thinks. Opposing thoughts go on in the mind itself. That is why we use the phrase 'two minds'. At the most we can say that the same mind runs after wordly matters at times, and at other times awakens to spiritual pursuits. Kindly clarify. PranAms to all advaitins. Ravi Shivde Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted June 1, 2005 Report Share Posted June 1, 2005 Shri Raviji, This is in reply to your following doubts : "You have posited Jeeva as an entity that 'thinks' and opposes mind. So far as I know Jeeva is just a spark of consciousness. Jeeva does not think. It is just a witness of thoughts that go on in the mind. It is the mind (though empowered by the power of Jeeva) that thinks. Opposing thoughts go on in the mind itself. That is why we use the phrase 'two minds'. At the most we can say that the same mind runs after wordly matters at times, and at other times awakens to spiritual pursuits. Kindly clarify. PranAms to all advaitins. Ravi Shivde ---- Please refer to the following Shruti : 1) Esh hi Drshta Sprashta Shrota Ghrata Rasayita Manta Boddha Karta Vidhnyatma Purushah : Pra. Up. 4/9 This is suffiicent to understand that Vidhnyanmaya can do anything including independent thinking or thinking through mind. He is called "Manta". He may or may not require mind for thinking. 2) Jakshat Kridat Ram manah : Chh. Up. 8/12/3 This very clear 3) "Dhyativa Lelayativa" : Bri. Up. 4/3/7 He appears like doing everything, being Upadhi Yukta. 4) Please refer to Bhagwan Shankar Bhashya : Bri. Up. 3/8/12 "Avidhya Kam Karma Vishishta Karya Karanopadh Atma" So, we can come to conculsion that Jeevatma is not dependent on any particular Sthool or Sukshma Indriya for his Avidhya Karya, including thinking. (He can get it done from substitute, like blind man gets sense of Jyoti by ears, say Shastra.) This is experience of all of us that when our mind is busy in thinking seriously on some material decision, we get hints from in side. Also, we observe that many a times when our mind tends to take decisions which will be harmful to us in future, Vidhnyanmay helps us by giving us hints with the help of other Indriyas, if mind is busy.Flickering of left eye, suddenly accelerated beating of heart, itching of left hand etc. are the symptoms. These are different in individual cases. If he does not think how it is possible that he can give us warnings ? Many people have the experience of listening of actual voice/sound from inside. This is true. Thank you, Anil Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted June 2, 2005 Report Share Posted June 2, 2005 praNAms Hare Krishna AB prabhuji: Please refer to the following Shruti : 1) Esh hi Drshta Sprashta Shrota Ghrata Rasayita Manta Boddha Karta Vidhnyatma Purushah : Pra. Up. 4/9 This is suffiicent to understand that Vidhnyanmaya can do anything including independent thinking or thinking through mind. He is called "Manta". He may or may not require mind for thinking. bhaskar : When the shruti telling us that our own svarUpa ultimately nothing but brahman, how can we attribute this individuality & independent thinking capability to vijnAnamaya kOsha?? kindly refer shankara bhAshya on taiterIya shruti where shankara clearly distinguishes our svarUpa from all the 5 kOsha-s. Ofcourse, we can attribute this *independent thinking faculty* to jIvAtman *as long as* he is wrongly identifying himself with nAma & rUpa upAdhi...that you've correctly mentioned below from shankara bhAshya : //quote // 4) Please refer to Bhagwan Shankar Bhashya : Bri. Up. 3/8/12 "Avidhya Kam Karma Vishishta Karya Karanopadh Atma" // unquote// AB prabhuji: So, we can come to conculsion that Jeevatma is not dependent on any particular Sthool or Sukshma Indriya for his Avidhya Karya, including thinking. (He can get it done from substitute, like blind man gets sense of Jyoti by ears, say Shastra.) bhaskar : The individual self which you are saying devoid of stUla & sUkShma indriya-s is nothing but advitIya parabrahman...coz. according to advaita, the individual self is by very nature no doer of action as he is identical with paramArtha tattva as pure being. At the end of the *tattu samanvayAt* sUtra bhAshya shankara quotes three shlOka-s (source unknown...Sri Sunder prabhuji kindly help) the first sloka which starts from gauNamithyAtmanOsattvE.......clearly tells us being too much attached to BMI through avidya the socalled jIvAtman mentally transfers their mundane features to himself...it is because of this anAdi avidyA he thinks he is the doer & enjoyer... (ahaM katru, ahaM bhOktru etc.). Hari Hari Hari Bol!!! bhaskar Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted June 2, 2005 Report Share Posted June 2, 2005 List Moderators Note: Please do not include the previous messages as a tail of your message while sending your replies. Both the new members and other members do seem to continue to repeat doing this. The list appreciates your cooperation in keeping the message crisp and clear by removing all unnecessary parts of previous messages. (As it is done in this message!) Please note that Sri Bhasker has provided you a detailed reply stating why he disagrees with you and it is your responsibility to clarify with more details. Please read his message again and answer him appropriately. Thanks in advance. ============================ Shri Bhaskar ji' I request you to read the post again, you may require to take help of seniors and/or think on the points again. Thank you, Anil bhaskar.yr wrote: praNAms Hare Krishna AB prabhuji: Please refer to the following Shruti : 1) Esh hi Drshta Sprashta Shrota Ghrata Rasayita Manta Boddha Karta Vidhnyatma Purushah : Pra. Up. 4/9 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted June 2, 2005 Report Share Posted June 2, 2005 Shri Bhaskar ji' praNAms AB prabhuji Hare Krishna AB prabhuji: I request you to read the post again, you may require to take help of seniors and/or think on the points again. Bhaskar : Prabhuji, to the best of my ability I've clarified my stand on *individual* jIvatva....Kindly educate me if I strayed anywhere from the advaita siddhAnta. Your above remark does not help me to learn anything about your view points or my mistakes. Hari Hari Hari Bol!!! bhaskar Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted June 3, 2005 Report Share Posted June 3, 2005 > Please refer to the following Shruti : >He is called "Manta". He may or may not >require mind for thinking. Dear Shri Anilji, Your knowledge of Shruti is highly appreciated. I lack the erudition to interepret these Shrutis. But IMHO Shruti also has to be logical. If Purusha starts undertaking functions like thinking, then what is the necessity for Prakriti? > This is experience of all of us that when our mind is > busy in thinking seriously on some material decision, we get > hints from in side. Also, we observe that many a times > when our mind tends to take decisions which will be harmful > to us in future, Vidhnyanmay helps us by giving us hints > with the help of other Indriyas, if mind is busy.Flickering > of left eye, suddenly accelerated beating of heart, itching > of left hand etc. are the symptoms. These are different in > individual cases. If he does not think how it is possible > that he can give us warnings ? I feel that such hints are given by the Subconscious Layer of mind, rather than Jeevatma. PranAms to all advaitins Ravi Shivde Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted June 3, 2005 Report Share Posted June 3, 2005 advaitin, bhaskar.yr@i... wrote: > At the end of the *tattu samanvayAt* > sUtra bhAshya shankara quotes three shlOka-s (source unknown...the first sloka which starts from > gauNamithyAtmanOsattvE.......clearly tells us being too much attached to > BMI through avidya the socalled jIvAtman mentally transfers their mundane > features to himself...it is because of this anAdi avidyA he thinks he is > the doer & enjoyer... (ahaM katru, ahaM bhOktru etc.). Namaste, Sw. Gambhirananda's translation gives the reference as sundarapANDya kArikA (Sundarapandya Karika). Also, http://advaitacentre.org/articles.htm has reference to Sundarapandya, but not to the verses specifically. Regards, Sunder Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted June 4, 2005 Report Share Posted June 4, 2005 “I feel that such hints are given by the Subconscious Layer of mind, rathert than Jeevatma.” PranAms to all advaitins Ravi Shivde Shri Raviji, You have written about the probability of sub-conscious mind, that could hint us and prognosticate about the forthcoming evil or happy events. As far as I understand, the concept of sub-conscious mind is not Hindu or Indian. Some people say that the western psychologists who would have otherwise found difficult to explain the cause of dreams have found out this sub-conscious mind theory. Ancient Indian sciences are not experimental sciences. There are no chances of changes in Indian theories. Our Rishis who knew the psychology, knew the roots of this science. They knew how, why and where the mind is created and when it is inserted in to human body. Modern science has so many opinions on this “mind” subject. Our Shastra(s) have clearly defined Antahkaran Chastushtaya which is comprised of Man (mind), Buddhi, Chitta and Ahankar. I am of the opinion that we should go according to our Shastra. Inner voice is true because the people including politicians have its experience. Senior members in this group must not have forgotten the “inner voice” theory told by Smt. Indira Gandhi, when she divided Congress and departed from Nijaligappa. Her theory was accepted by most of the Indians. Nobody asked her whether it was a voice of Jeevatma or Sub-conscious mind ? Political BrahmaDnyan appears to be Vilakshan ! You have written as under : “But IMHO Shruti also has to be logical.” Kindly understand that Mother Shruti need NOT be logical. Logic often fails, like Buddha had tried going logically against Vedas. His “Kshanik VidhnyanWad” and “ShunyaWad” could not stand against Adwaita Vedanta, and his religion could survive only by copying Patanjal and Sankhya. Hindus who are most tolerant people in the world due to Samskars of Shruti-based religion, could face the aggressions of many religions in past like Muslims and Christians, only due to Akshay knowledge of Shruti. There is absolutely no doubt about the “Apouresheyatwa” of Upanishada. Many Yogees still listen (shrut) the holy Vedic hymns in their Dhyanawashtha. So, Shruti are undoubtedly the words of Brahma. Logic is not at all necessary. If we say ”Shruti has to be logical”, it will mean that we doubt the knowledge of Shruti. This is unfortunate. All the educated and Shraddhawan Hindu people have some responsibilities, because the aggressions are not over. Hinduism need to be saved from the people like Jesus-Adwaitins who are converting thousands of Hindus from remote areas to their religion in India. This is why Drashta Mahapurush like Pujaniya saint Chinmayanand had to organize mission to save our knowledge and culture. This is my request that any word about Shruti be written with full thinking. You have written, “If Purusha starts undertaking functions like thinking, then what is the necessity for Prakriti?” We all know that Prakriti has no functions, not even existence till Purusha starts undertaking it after gaining Upadhi. If we debate on the subject of necessity of Prakriti, it will be a Dosha of keeping aside what is in existence and arguing on the matters those have not cropped up (those appear to eyes for moments). Shastra say that there is no Hetu. (particular intention to create Srushti). The famous saint of 17th century from Maharashtra, Sant Ramdas Swami has written, “Phoduni Shabdanche Antar, Vastu Dakhavi Nij Saar” (He is Dhnyani who can break the word and show the BrahmaVastu to his disciple). Breaking of word is to find the secret meaning of the words. We must understand the secrets of the words. There are many hidden meanings of the words of Shastra, which are neither Wachyartha nor Lakshyartha. These meanings are known to the saints and are passed on to generations through their disciples (sampraday) who keep it great secret. Had Max Muller known those secrets, he would have become Saibaba of the world or bigger than Jesus. Only knowledge of words is not Atmadhnyan. Shruti, Smruti and incarnations like Bhagwan Shankar have therefore, repeatedly told us that we should get the meanings understood from Guru without stretching our own logic. We in our country have many Dhnyani Gurus. Osho (this is not the praise of Osho or his doctrines) in his book “Vedanta, an art of dying” has rightly written, “if Jesus had born in India, except few disciples, nobody would have attended what he said and would have never crucified him. We in India have many Jesus in towns and villages and they also speak not only like “ I am a king of Jews”, but they say, “I am Brahma.” So, Dhnyani Guru are not in shortage in India,if we try to find out. If our quest for knowledge is genuine, we have to take help of the Dhnyani persons by making some sacrifice of Sewa, Money or Time or all three. Why do not we understand that they (Dhnyani) also have paid cost of their life to understand the knowledge of God. We know that Janak Raja had paid heavy donations to Yadhnyawalkya, and also we know the story of Janashruti. Most of the Dnyanis do not ask for money, but this is not a test of Dhnyani. We ought to spare some time and give them service and time. We should understand that they give up their families and relations and everything they possess to keep the great Parampara of Dhnyanis by understanding and following Hindu Shastra(s). Why we can not become their children and give them time and service, at least for our own advantage. If we understand the meanings of the words, it becomes easier for us to find our own way in spiritual life. Let us take for example “Bhaj Govindam, Moodhmate”. Millions of people chant the name of Govinda. Millions go to Tirupati Balaji Mandir from all over world, and with great Bhakti Bhav shout “Govinda Govinda” There are beautiful songs and Bhajans praising Govinda. There are thousands of people who get tears in their eyes if they utter the word “Govinda”. If I tell you that “Bhaj Govindam” is a secret message to Sanyasi to attend to Brahmacharya, and never let it loose, you will probably disagree with me. You can get this confirmed from any self-realized Saint, if I am wrong. Shruti hints the Saints mysteriously. If we read the Anand Mimansa in Taitreya (2-8), we only get confused and think that Brahmanand is something which probably is impossible to be achieved by human being. Shruti say that Sansari get Leshmatra Anand. What is the difference in the taste of a spoonful of sugur and taste of a store full of sugur ? There are great secret teachings to the Adhikari(s), in this Anuwak. Scholars gain nothing from Shruti except knowledge of words and little ego,”I have knowledge of Upanishad”. Who really gains is the person who surrenders to Parmatma and forgets logic. If one really surrenders completely, please be cent per cent sure that whether one gets human Guru or not Shruti herself tells the secret meanings to the readers and make them Dhnyanis. Anil Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted June 6, 2005 Report Share Posted June 6, 2005 Dear Sri Anil ji Pranam to you & all the members of this site. , Anil ji, your words are so refreshing & awakning in our advaitin site. Thank you for your time & sharing your experience. S. Raghabananda advaitin [advaitin] On Behalf Of Anil Bharatey Saturday, June 04, 2005 7:54 AM advaitin * .... Had Max Muller known those secrets, he would have become Saibaba of the world or bigger than Jesus. Only knowledge of words is not Atmadhnyan. Shruti, Smruti and incarnations like Bhagwan Shankar have therefore, repeatedly told us that we should get the meanings understood from Guru without stretching our own logic. We in our country have many Dhnyani Gurus. Osho (this is not the praise of Osho or his doctrines) in his book "Vedanta, an art of dying" has rightly written, "if Jesus had born in India, except few disciples, nobody would have attended what he said and would have never crucified him. We in India have many Jesus in towns and villages and they also speak not only like " I am a king of Jews", but they say, "I am Brahma." So, Dhnyani Guru are not in shortage in India,if we try to find out. ..... If our quest for knowledge is genuine, we have to take help of the Dhnyani persons by making some sacrifice of Sewa, Money or Time or all three. Why do not we understand that they (Dhnyani) also have paid cost of their life to understand the knowledge of God. We know that Janak Raja had paid heavy donations to Yadhnyawalkya, and also we know the story of Janashruti. Most of the Dnyanis do not ask for money, but this is not a test of Dhnyani. We ought to spare some time and give them service and time. We should understand that they give up their families and relations and everything they possess to keep the great Parampara of Dhnyanis by understanding and following Hindu Shastra(s). Why we can not become their children and give them time and service, at least for our own advantage. ..... .. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.