Guest guest Posted June 24, 2005 Report Share Posted June 24, 2005 ------------------ After realization, only the notions that world is real and I am separate from the world, etc disappears. I will still see the plurality but I will not have the delusion that plurality is real. ------------------ Hello, I have a question regarding the above. For mystics, the importance is on gaining a mystical experience (like say nirvikalpa samadhi for the followers of the yoga-sutras). In this experience, they are physically experiencing something beyond what we usually experience. In Advaita, is a realized person experiencing something like the above, or does he only have knowledge about Reality? Or, does he have both? Regards, Mayuresh. Discover Stay in touch with email, IM, photo sharing and more. Check it out! http://discover./stayintouch.html Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted June 25, 2005 Report Share Posted June 25, 2005 Hello Mayuresh, Mayuresh: For mystics, the importance is on gaining a mystical experience (like say nirvikalpa samadhi for the followers of the yoga- sutras). In this experience, they are physically experiencing something beyond what we usually experience. Ns: You're right, everyone is looking to experience something unusual. That's what keeps Disney's World spinning. But, `Mystics' are often jaded by rollercoaster rides, and most other `worldly' thrills besides. This insatiable breed wants some grand cosmic blast- off. With a bit of luck, these too can come, …and will surely go. "'Everything' that comes, will also go." (Ramana) The way of the worlds, even cosmic ones, is: if you chase after the `ups' you'll keep falling into the `downs.' This spinning around on a wheel of ups and downs can all get very old and tiresome. Even the grand samahdis are just more of the same-old, and will keep you pinned solid to that endless, repetitive cycle. There is an old Zen saying, "Have just one samahdi, and you fly straight to hell like an arrow." The `mystic' who comes to see this is ready to leave all experiences behind. If he no longer has experiences, that would mean that either he is dead or he has ceased to believe in his heart that he is a creature that can have experiences. He cannot deny that he exists, but it is in everyone's power to deny that they exist AS `this' or as `that' particular object. A denial such as this makes him a complete `no- thing' that stands within his own nothingness, experiencing nothing but him-Self. An odd Experience, you must admit. Obviously, this makes for quite a radical shift of one's living perspective. Ramana said, "You live in the Self, not in the world." Our `nothing man' now lives 24 X 7 disembodied. Yes, there remains a fully conscious jiva throughout, but the landlord has left the (body, mind, acts) premises entirely vacant. Now, two perspectives: a creature in the world, and a Self-centered Self, centered solely in its Self. We all make a choice (whether we know it or not) as to which perspective is really `us.' Listen to Nisargadatta speak from jiva mukta (liberation `From' a jiva): "In your world I would be most miserable. To wake up, to eat, to talk, to sleep again—what a bother!" "Yes, I appear to hear and see and talk and act, but to me it just happens, as to you digestion, or perspiration happens. The body- mind machine looks after it, but leaves me out of it. Just as you do not need to worry about growing hair, so I need not worry about words and actions. They just happen and leave me unconcerned, for in my world nothing ever goes wrong." NS: That's the sound of detachment, and detachment beats out all the cosmic experiences and rides that Disney ever dreamed of. Namaste, Non Sum Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted June 25, 2005 Report Share Posted June 25, 2005 advaitin, "nonsums" <nonsums> wrote: > Hello Mayuresh, > Mayuresh: For mystics, the importance is on gaining a mystical > experience (like say nirvikalpa samadhi for the followers of the yoga- > sutras). In this experience, > they are physically experiencing something beyond what we usually > experience. > > Ns: You're right, everyone is looking to experience something > unusual. That's what keeps Disney's World spinning. But, `Mystics' > are often jaded by rollercoaster rides, and most other `worldly' > thrills besides. This insatiable breed wants some grand cosmic blast- > off. With a bit of luck, these too can come, …and will surely go. Namaste, Actually Mystics are really seeking non-experience, or experience some with an ego/mind. Nir Vikalpa or Nir Guna means No Mind, No Modes, etc. This is the whole purpose of a Guru to encourage less activity not more. So Mystics wish to awaken to the fact that they are Nirguna and this never happened at all, not even the dream of it....ONS...Tony. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted June 25, 2005 Report Share Posted June 25, 2005 Hi Tony, You are 100% correct as regards a true 'mystic.' I was addressing the instance of "mystic" that Mayuresh described; a not uncommon breed, actually. I would be willing to bet the majority of mystic seekers begin (and long persist) by seeking a dazzling experience for, and had by, their jiva. The quote you excerped does go on to describe that a genuine mystic eventually comes to tire and despair of being an experience junkie, however cosmic its promise may be. Then we have an entirely different 'mystic' than the one Mayuresh introduced. "After the ecstacy, the laundry." (Zen monk saying) NS (No Starch) Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.