Guest guest Posted July 15, 2005 Report Share Posted July 15, 2005 Divine will prevails CHENNAI: Among its many unique features, the epic Ramayana's detailed exposition of the Saranagathi principle is considered foremost, as it unfolds a practical demonstration of the theoretical nuances of this Sastra. Whatever has been ordained in the scriptures as essential requirements in this process is revealed through "showing" rather than mere "telling". It describes in detail the various occasions when pleas for succour were fruitful, and in the instance of Vibhishana's Saranagathi, the Lord reaffirms His vow of protection to those who seek His feet in the proper spirit. It also describes instances when such pleas failed to bear fruit, to show some of the deficiencies in the practical application of the supplication. This is well illustrated in the episode in the Ramayana wherein Bharata had made Saranagathi (surrender) to Rama, pleading with Rama to return to Ayodhya and accept the kingship. It is imperative that God should accept the plea to make the Saranagathi bear fruit, said Velukkudi V. Krishnan in a lecture. But in this instance Bharata's entreaty failed to evoke the desired result despite the undisputed fact that both the supplicant and the protector fulfilled all the necessary qualifications required of their respective roles. Rama was all-powerful and capable of giving protection to Bharata. Bharata too more than fulfilled the role of a supplicant. But Bharata's plea clashed with Rama's interests, since He had already granted protection to the Devas and had promised to kill Ravana. Bound by that promise, he had to get ahead with the prime purpose of His incarnation. When Dasaratha surrendered to Parasurama, it did not succeed because neither the supplicant nor the protector had the necessary credentials. Dasaratha was never helpless, and could not claim to be solely dependent on Parasurama. Parasurama for his part lacked compassion and Saulabya (approachability). So this surrender failed. Similarly when Rama appealed to the Ocean Lord for help to cross the ocean, this Saranagathi was not effective, as it was a case of reversal of roles of Saranyan (protector) and Saranagathan (supplicant). Rama being all-powerful could not claim to be eligible to be a supplicant. He could have drained the waters of the ocean with his Rama Bana. The latter's shortcomings could hardly meet the criteria as protector. copy right: The Hindu Daily Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.